debate with respect to federalism had to do with whether congress would be permitted to regulate interstate commerce or states or be required to regulate commerce first and as an adjunct to that constrain what states could do. that is exactly what this statute did. the federal government, if congress wanted a prohibition under state law because it would have no responsibility, no accountability and a brief says, 's brief says, if you are complaining about accountability, call your senator. that is exactly what the united states talked about, what this court talked about in new york versus united states. the accountability is very important. the structure is important to the liberty of citizens and this statute violates that urbain -- that ordained structure. >> thank you. the case is submitted. [captions copyright national cable satellite corp. 2017] [captioning performed by the national captioning institute, which is responsible for its caption content and accuracy. visit ncicap.org] the most important issue for my state's funding. a lot of times we talk about the lack of resources and the quality

but it may not regulate states regulation of interstate commerce. >> mr. olson, isn't that what the government does whenever it preempts state laws? it regulates. olson: when the government regulate state laws, the federal government has initially taken that position or action to regulate interstate commerce in some respect and when it does that, this court has repeatedly held it may preempt contradictory or inconsistent state laws. ferc, the you make of government gave the state a choice. regulate or don't regulate at all. and -- >> it gave the states a choice in conjunction with the regulation of the area -- >> no. there were federal standards, the states were told except the more do not if you do not -- accept them or do not but if you do not you will not regulate in neither will we. so -- >> the consequence of that is that the states could regulate according to the standards established by the federal government with respect to the regulation of interstate commerce and if the states chose not to do that, the field was left to the federal government. as

and they impede our ability to grow to embrace interstate commerce. >> thank you but i just want to sayhe president suggested that corporate revenue could pay for investment that they were exclusively to use to bring down the tax rate. and there is $1 trillion there. with those loopholes to pay capital gains rates with responsible reforms to generate enough revenue twice adding insult to injury to pay for the infrastructure proposal so the president test infrastructure spendingdi it $200 billion with thebi trickle-down taxes and now will pay for his proposal on the back of illinois families with handouts to wall street 44 million jobs rely on the network we need to get serious to grow the economy to go up against south korea and japan andd china so with that i yield back. >> thank you. speaking of that so the wear and tear on locks and dams the state of arkansas does appreciate but i don't think we are smart in the way that we do things. we would very much like to go to 12 feet relatively inexpensive expenditure and with less wear and tear. and then have 40% more product. and to talk ab

borders around their own internet pre--- creating their own privacy rules at interferes with interstate commerce so i going back to title i we avoid that issue and it's clarified that the internet is an issue of interstate commerce. this doesn't conflict with anything that happened before we talked about some people might ring up the issue of municipal broadband where pretold the fcc you can't mess with what states are doing their. that was because the fcc was intervening in how states were managing their budget so a state actually creates localities within it. localities have no constitutional protections. they are a manifestation of the state and the state manages them so the federal government does not have a right to come in and tell a state how should manage its internal government and that aspects of these are not the same kind of things we are talking and interstate commerce issue. in talking about privacy we really don't want to have states making these kinds of rules. we do want the expert agency, the fcc to be working on this. in fact right now that the workshop going on about informat

we're talking about an interstate commerce issue. in talking about privacy. we don't want to have states making these rules. we want the expert agency to be working on. the ftc has been looking at these issues for decades, talking about how data should be used. bravecy. we don't want to preclude different models before they should come up. we don't want to hamper unlimited data, and we don't want to prevent an instance where perhaps we could be compensated for the data we are exchanging with companies, i think that would be problematic, some of us might like to get paid for surfing facebook all day. i'll stop there. >> katie, thank you very much. i was glad you mentioned order. it reminded me, in susan crawford's book, she's one of the leading opponents. she flat out and unabash edly said she thought the internet should be regulated just like we regulate electricity and water delivery. when you think about it, water hadn't changed that much over the next couple years. the internet changes almost weekly. it makes me wonder if that's the way the internet ought

they impede our ability to grow and a brace interstate commerce and really serve consumers the way we would expect. >> thank you. my last 12 seconds i want to say during the campaign president trump suggested repatriating overseas corporate revenue could pay for robust infrastructure investments and, unfortunately, those revenues were exclusively used to buy down the corporate tax rate in his new tax bill, and zero repatriated dollars will be set aside for infrastructure. that's about $1 trillion there. the republican textile preserved a loophole that allows hedge fund and private equity managers to pay capital gains rates on their carried interest which president trump repeatedly pledged to eliminate. response performs the close this loophole would generate enough revenue to rehab every lock and inland water system twice. adding insult to injury,, president trump will rely on budget cuts to pay for his infrastructure proposal, cuts will hurt illinois families and businesses. let me summarize, despite the rhetoric the president and his allies did nothing to play for every such investm

claims it violates interstate commerce law in u.s.n. >>> how to give vehicle a long life. >> 7 on your side's michael finney here. >> i try to find a car i like and keep it long time. good news. takes average motorist about 15 years to reach 200,000 miles on car. but with technology drive save $30,000 more while at it. secret, staying on top of maintenance. never ignore service indicators in newer cars and older cars read the maintenance schedule in the owner's manual. >> following the schedule is key to getting car to 200,000 miles. don't delay routine oil and filter changes, belt and tire rotations. >> if you live where the weather is extreme, near the ocean or drive in dusty conditions, shorter service intervals may be necessary. >> may mean changing oil more regularly. in the long run, it's worth it. >> don't cheap out. wrong oil or transmission fluid could wreak havoc on the car or void your warranty. buy genuine parts from brand name suppliers and tackle rust early. if anything sounds or smells off, probably is. beware of shops

instance when she sues because under federal law there is supposed to be no segregation on interstate commerce, she wins at the trial court level with her attorney. it is appealed to the u.s. supreme court, in the case of hall v. decuir results in her loss. not just a personal loss for her, but a loss that would pave the way for plessy versus ferguson in 1896. why? it was determined that is black-and-white or put together on the steamship, it would be violent. whites would become so angry at having to sit next to last that they would start a fight and they would be violence. in order to keep a mutiny from taking place, the captain had the right to segregate people on the ship. so this need to segregate, to , maintain order was something you see later in plessy v. ferguson. at the same time you have the backlash that comes from the end of reconstruction. we have states deciding to institute segregation of laws, and by 1890 we have the mississippi plan. states across the country are starting to enact literacy tests, grandfather clauses would say if your grandfather didn't vote before 1865 then y

the common commerce clause with those interstate commerce 77% of all freight crosses straight state lines but they cannot shoulder investment to improve that. it is a down payment but more is needed to keep pace that as a percentage of gdp spending on what it does on infrastructure that formula dollars to have complex trade projects is limited recognizing this a much-needed grant program to target large fray and highway projects and competitive programs encourage and incentivize not to get involved with $800 million in fy in fy 16 and leverage $3.6 billion of total investment. just because a project is more affordable to the federal government it doesn't mean it is the most valuable investment for a country's economy. they should first be evaluated on the ability to meet congressionally program goals to sponsor strategic investment we make recommendations number one a national vision that investment strategy should shape and guide the infrastructure system with coordination among states and regions and focusing on the intermodal freight should be established with policy with a significant

the're saying, look, congress of power over interstate commerce. slaves are a species of commerce. let's interfere. in the 1830's and 1840's, that meta-because slaves are not being traded anymore. they are going from all tobacco country into the cotton country. interfering in interstate commerce of slavery would have strangled the cotton kingdom much more quickly tahhan in fact non-extension. >> as i said in my paper, i want to reiterate, it is really the 833 americann the 1 anti-slavery society constitution in philadelphia, this program, de- nationalization, it is right there. they were the ones who really came up with this. who cobbled together arguments, constitutional lines of reasoning from the early republic and peace to together and created a truly national freedom project and one that attacks slavery as an institution, not only in the territories but throughout areas jurisdiction.'s n. how it's pressure the slave states to immediately -- of abolition. whether it is immediate or gradual within the process, that's a question we should talk about. but the idea was that this as

when it becomes more inefficient and slower to go by rail, railroads are being forced by interstate commerce system to maintain passenger service. they were losing money hand over fist. eventually, they would downsize hassan's or service and then do away with it until the 1970's until you -- downsize passenger service, and then do away with when theythe 1970's, formed amtrak. the main way of making money has been freight. you see a resurgence in rail transportation. rail in particular is one of the most successful lines for amtrak. city, ient to kansas took the train. trip.t mind making that it's faster to go by plane, but for me, it's still something to go by rail. quakes there you have the american rail -- >> there you have the american rail. , thejustifiable pride american railroads face forward with defining faith in the fundamentals of democracy. will continue to serve the american people along proven pathway to progress and ever greater prosperity. announcer: you can view this and other american artifacts on our website, .-span.org/americanhistory bus to herc-span continues its 50 capi

congress for a year hundred years has a famous case in 1903 has had the power to prevent interstate commerceone state to another whether it's the passage of the digital passage so congress can say for any reason or no reason we think gambling is bad and we will make it illegal because it affects interstate commerce. the new jersey side is it really has nothing to do with it. it has to do with your morality of gambling reserved to states under the 10th amendment. by tramping our ability to eliminate us who want to do it eliminate us he wanted to at a rate of a public morality in the u.s. stepping on a race resume to us in the 10th amendment. for years the 10th amendment arguments were rejected by the supreme court. some justices refer to the 10th amendment is true with them, stated the obvious cover that which was not surrendered their pretend that the states. in recent years can the 10th amendment has seen a new vitality as the courts have clipped congress is weighing when it tries to regulate anything under that mask of interstate commerce. prediction can the state of new jersey wins. it wi

time where it becomes more in efficient and slower to go by rail, railroads remain forced by interstate commerce commission took maintain passenger service and they were losing money hand over fist. eventually they would start to downsize their passenger service and do away with it. in the 1970's you see the , i way for amtrak railroads to get rid of a service that was bleeding and can't afford to operate. they are focusing on what is their main mode of making money, it has always been freight. after september 11, you are seeing a resurgence in rail transportation. the northeast corridor door is one of the most successful lines for amtrak in terms of revenue-generating and the number of people to travel on that route. when i went to kansas city i actually took the train. i don't mind making that trip. it is a little longer than going by plane, but for me it is still something -- fun to travel by rail. >> there you have the american railroad, created by the individual efforts, pulled it invested savings of the american people. with justifiable pride in a competence of the past, -- accomplishments

it claims the law violates an interstate commerce clause in the u.s. constitution. >>> former 49ers colin kaepernick is one of ten candidates for time magazines person of the year. kaepernick was the first nfl player to take a knee to protest inequality. he's been a free agent since march and has yet to sign with a team. the d.r.e.a.m.ers, thousands of undocumented immigrants brought to the u.s. by their parents and the me too movement which aims to shed light on the prevalence of sexual harassment and assault. >>> up next, 25 years ago today the very first text message was sent. >> that's right. so why do people like them so much, more than e-mails and phone >>> well, yesterday was a very important anniversary for anyone with two thumb and a spart phone. the very first text message was sebt. jonathan bloom explains what's changed since then and what hasn't. >> reporter: 25 years ago text message looked like this. >> it was expensive. it was 5 cents a text i think. >> reporter: but along came smart phones and it was clear texting was no passing fad. >>

a federal appeals court has rejected claims that it violates the constitution's interstate commerce clause. the missouri attorney general argues that the new lawsuit is bolstered by an economic study. (catherine) facebook has announced a new stand-alone app called 'messenger kids'... it's designed for children under 13-years old.(grant) pre-teens can use the app to chat with their friends, make face-time calls with kid- friendly photo filters and send age-appropriate images. parents must set up accounts for their kids and approve who they can chat with.(catherine) the rules for traditional facebook services aren't changing -- kids still have to be thirteen years old to get their own accounts. a preview version of messenger kids rolled out today on apple devices. (grant) ahead in sports... jimmy garoppolo makes his starting debut. and the niners win. gary radnich joins us in studio to talk sports. (catherine) and after the break-- just a few days after the one year anniversary of the ghost ship fire-- the two men being held responsible are heading to court. (grant) tonight at 5:30... a very

this bill simply allows americans who travel in interstate commerce to take their second amendment right with them, which is what the founders intended. i'm also pleased that this bill s being paired with h.r. 4477, the fix nics act of 2017. this bipartisan and bicameral bill, mr. chairman, was introduced by two of the now absent chairmen texas delegation colleagues, mr. culberson and mr. cuellar. the fix nics act takes steps to ensure state and federal agencies enter all relevant records into the f.b.i.'s national instant background -- criminal background check system, or nics. this bill will help ensure people who are legaly prohibited from having guns do not get them . the church shootings in charleston, south carolina, and sutherland springs, texas, are tragic reminders what have can happen when all relevant records are not entered into the system. our nics system is only as good as the information within it. this important piece of legislation len sure that the information is -- will ensure that the information is complete and up to date. taken together, these two bills preserve and

this bill simply allows americans who travel in interstate commerce to take their second amendment right with them, which is what the founders intended. i'm also pleased that this bill is being paired with h.r. 4477, the fix nics act of 2017. this bipartisan and bicameral bill, mr. chairman, was introduced by two of the now absent chairmen texas delegation colleagues, mr. culberson and mr. cuellar. the fix nics act takes steps to ensure state and federal agencies enter all relevant records into the f.b.i.'s national instant background -- criminal background check system, or nics. this bill will help ensure people who are legally prohibited from having guns do not get them. the church shootings in charleston, south carolina, and sutherland springs, texas, are tragic reminders what have can happen when all relevant records are not entered into the system. our nics system is only as good as the information within it. this important piece of legislation len sure that the information is -- will ensure that the information is complete and up to date. taken together, these two bills preserve an

they are justified as a national but what mostre, congresspeople wanted from the interstate highway system was faster commerce, faster transportation. two.have first of all, were blacks fighting for the seminoles treated differently? or were they returned to slavery? at what point did west point institute a loyalty oath? was that in this time period? was that during the civil war? >> the question about the loyalty oath is an issue. it's basically during the time of the civil war. during the nullification crisis, direct department did some commanding officers to administer loyalty else i think in cases where they were concerned about some of the loyalty of some of the officers in some places or cadets at west point from certain states, but it's basically a civil war thing . -- i guess the best term would be the refugees from american slavery of on the a highly because it is contested issue -- the army saw them as -- first, they were very dedicated to not being re-enslaved, so they were fighting very hard against the u.s. because they figured, pretty accurately, that if the u.s. got you, then they might be re-e

but what most congress people wanted from the interstate highway system was faster commerce, faster transportation. >> i have two. first of all, were blacks fighting for the seminoles treated differently? for they officially seminoles at that point or were they returned to slavery? second, at what point did west point institute a loyalty oath? >> the question about the loyalty oath is a little easier. that's basically at the time of the civil war. during the nullification crisis the war department did direct some commanding officers to administer loyalty oaths i think in cases were they were concerned about the loyalties of some of the officers in some places or maybe cadets at west point from certain states. but it's basically a civil war thing. and then for the -- i guess the best term would be the refugees from american slavery among the seminoles because it's a highly contested issue. the army saw them as first they were very dedicated to not being reenslaved, so they were fighting very hard against the u.s. because they figured pretty accurately that if the u.s. captured them, they might be r

blades actually go down onto the ground to push the snow out of the way and interstates are always our primary. concerned with commerces try to keep them opened for, you know, fuel, for food and to the grocery stores. this is less of a concern with this one because it's not a ma >> right ellen. >> we work primary roads and secondary roads and subdivisions at the same time. >> ellen from your perspective how much different is this that it's happening on a saturday versus happening on a wednesday? >> well, the only thing that we pay attention to -- i mean, we work 24 hours a day in storms like this so it really doesn't make a difference to us but what it does is it takes a lot of those crushes of traffic around the rush hours out of the equation. >> you're not putting down less salt because you anticipate less traffic? >> no, no, not at all. >> okay. >> we look at the road temperatures and once they start -- once the salt starts going down and then people start getting up and going out for the day we know there's always going to be people that are going to be on the road, that friction of the cars moving is going to ess

job these last 65 years has been to tempt travelers off interstate 80 at the utah-nevada border, with this tiny gash of high desert, casino commerce and most leave knowing precious little about the stories wendover love to tell about the racers that come here to break speed records at the nearby bonneville flats, and about the local air base where the plane that took off for hiroshima. but there's also the story they whispered to each other up and down the little strip, the one that shocked them all, that puzzles them still about the terrible night when three families lost their teenage children. about the dark mysteries spawned under the pointing grin of wendover will. ♪ >> it was a thursday afternoon. a windy, late winter day in the high desert, here at the local high school, star runner micaela costanzo cleaned up after track practice. mickey, as everyone called her, intended to walk home. wasn't far, about a mile. her usual ride, her sister christina was out of town. >> before we had left, me and/or my husband would always pick micaela up from school, and so we were, like, are you sure you're going to have a way home? >> this

interstate 5 is the major arterial between mexico and canada as a matter of fact. and so we're talking about something that is fundamentally important to the movement of people and commercethe area having been impacted here." (pam) right now, washington state patrol is giving an update on the investigation... we are following the story.. .and bring you a live update on what comes out of the press conference tonight at 8-30. (pam) to san bruno=== where police are searching for a driver in a deadly hit and run crash.(steve) police first responded to a report of a person lying in the road on early sunday morning. it was on state highway 35 between college drive and sharp park road in san bruno. the victim died at the scene. and police discovered that they had been hit by a car.(pam) today police released a picture of a possible suspect car. this is a photo of what that car would look like. a 20-04 to 20-07 black saab 9-3. investigators say the car would have damage to the front passenger side..including damage to the bumper and passenger side mirror. (pam) in the east bay... mediators continue to work with the city of oakland and the worker's union to figure out a contract

interstate 5 is the major arterial between mexico and canada as a matter of fact. and so we're talking about something that is fundamentally important to the movement of people and commerce in the area having been impacted here." (steve) (steve) just after the crash president trump tweeted.. saying the accident shows why his soon to be submitted infrastructure plan should be approved quickly.. a short time later he tweeted thoughts and prayers for everyone involved in the tragedy. (pam) continuing our team coverage.. back here in the bay area -- thousands of people ride amtrak trains everyday. many use it to commute back and forth to work... others use it to travel all across the country. kron 4's charles clifford is live tonight at the amtrak station in emeryville, where he spoke with riders about today's accident. charles, what are people saying. . . well, people are really stunned. train travel is very safe so news of a fatal derailment is unsettling.nats ding. . ding. . .at the amtrak station in emeryville, monday's deadly derailment in washington state had left some riders shaken.rhona gordon and her husband have been traveling cross country on amtrak.sotit's pretty

interstate information service. the order makes plain that broadband will be subject to uniform national framework that promotes investment in innovation. this is eminently reasonable and completely consistent with the constitution's commercial climbers -- commercial commerce clause. pertainingticularly to wireless services, where mobile devices can easily crossed state lines. this could have genetic and drastic results where it was possible for these medications to be prioritized in one state and not another. the hodgepodge of state rules were not only contain the next generation of wireless systems which have been working so hard to promote, also the technology that may rely on these networks in the future. accordingly, any laws or regulations conflict with or undermine are preempted. i would actually have gone further, but i can only carry the debate so far today. this is not a novel edition. the board also announced a firm petition to excise our authority to preclude states from imposing obligations on broadband services that are inconsistent deskcarefully inventoried regulated schemes -- related schemes. although the order does the knowledge and extremely limited state role in enforcing their traditional police powers, state actions that go beyond thi

interstate 5 is the major arterial between mexico and canada as a matter of fact. and so we're talking about something that is fundamentally important to the movement of people and commerce in the area having been impacted here." (catherine) the first members of an n=t=s=b "go=team" are on the scene tonight.they'll be looking for the locomotive's "black box" - and working to determine the train's speed in the curve. vicki and grant? (vicki) in the east bay... no contract yet. that is the latest out of the east bay, as the jobs of three thousand city workers remain in the balance (grant) workers remain on the job in oakland tonight, unlike last monday, when they were on strike. q this evening...mediation continues as the two sides try to hammer out a deal. but without a plan in place, could a strike occur again (vicki) kron four's terisa estacio is in oakland for us on the latest tes -i just talked with a union spokesperson here at the seiu headquarters in oakland he says for now, they are optimistic but also add there are still many unresolved issues.(estacio) felipe cuevas, president of the oakland chapter of seiu 1021. we have issues of public safety.earlier today, fel

interstate information service. the order makes plain that broadband will be subject to uniform, national framework that promotes investment in innovation. this is imminently reasonable and completely consistent with the constitution's commerce clause. broadband service is not confined to state boundaries and should not be contained by a patchwork of state regulations. mobile devices and the transmissions they carry can easily cross state lines. this could have dramatic and drastic results were it possible for such communications to be prioritized in one state but not in another. a hodgepodge of state rules could severely curtail not only the next generation of wireless systems that we have been working so hard to promote but also the technologies that may rely on these networks in the future. accordingly, any laws or regulations that conflict with or undermine the federal broadband policies are preempted. i would actually have gone further on preemption but i could only carry the debate so far today. this is not a new or novel position. the 2015 order also announced a firm intention to exercise our preemption authority to preclude states from imposing obligations on broadband service that are inconsistent with the carefully