intment, but not about in general what the retirement board can or should not do. thank you. next speaker, please. >> i've been a san francisco voter since 1908 and am the city of somebody who will have a city pension in a few years an i know he agrees with me in all this. i want to thank you for your unanimous vote to ask the pension board to invest in the fossil fuels. that was such a different time. during the nearly two years since that spring 2012 vote the retirement board has done little but waffle and mumble about how risky it might be. i've been to those meetings, i speak from experience. the world has moved forward around them and the reason to divest in momentum to do them have grown spectacularly. the reasons that i think motivate it had board of supervisors to vote was the reality of climate change and the scientific news keeps getting more terrible in the 20 months since you vote. we're now in a race to save the world from the worst case scenario frs climate change divest ment as this retirement board was asked to do. another aspect that's change td since april o