we've invieded some of america's brightest minds in medicine and technology and some of our strongest advocates for privacy and perhaps most importantly we provided patience most at stake in these efforts. we're here to harness what is most special about america. that is our spirit of innovation our abilities to dream and take risks and try to do things. as a result of that not only improve our economy but lives and women and children in general issues to come. together, what's so exciting is we have the possibility of leading an entirely new era of medicine that make sure new jobs and new industries and new life saving treatments for diseases are created right here in the united states. we shouldn't just celebrate innovation, we have to invest in innovation. we have to nurture innovation. we have to encourage it. make sure we're channelling it in ways that are most productive. that's especially true when it comes to medicine. after all when american researchers developed a vaccine for polio, a program created by congress helped to distribute it. it helped american doctors discover th

. >> thank you for invieding me to this greath[:1 y >> any frailties that i say today you can attributeo stand up for himself. not so concerned with the idea of federalism thinking of how to pc234q any of that but more consequential q#÷n ñ and instrumental that is to sayy,#kt we are concerned about utility of<ú÷ states and fashioning immigration policy and=@zocp÷ the effect of the state policy on separation of policy and power and preemption doctrine et cetera. ultimately we will argue in the paper that the response to executive branch!f&kv action can be5çñ used to vindicate power concern and as jillian metzger mentioned, to realizehd8@& )jz and so it ismyy federalism perhaps we can say masquerading, or at least used as a vehicle to show the other types of2@lÑ concern. with bill marshal on the prior panel, withzx"q=$ immigration federalism is strongly part of it. the reaction you get at state and local level often times we argue has nothing with demographic reality and have oo'f1 o partisan reality more than anything else. the localities have been significant.é players on the immigratio

. >> thank you for invieding me to this greath[:1 y >> any frailties that i say today you can attributeand instrumental that is to sayy,#kt we are concerned about utility of<ú÷ states and fashioning immigration policy and=@zocp÷ the effect of the state policy on separation of policy and power and preemption doctrine et cetera. ultimately we will argue in the paper that the response to executive branch!f&kv action can be5çñ used to vindicate power concern and as jillian metzger mentioned, to realizehd8@& )jz and so it ismyy federalism perhaps we can say masquerading, or at least used as a vehicle to show the other types of2@lÑ concern. with bill marshal on the prior panel, withzx"q=$ immigration federalism is strongly part of it. the reaction you get at state and local level often times we argue has nothing with demographic reality and have oo'f1 o partisan reality more than anything else. the localities have been significant.é players on the immigration field. those years have been devoid of congressional action. i say not kwens dentally because as we argue using larry cramer's work, wi