least inweighed at inner circles of the gun rights movement, the nra and elsewhere by the fear that aove towards smart dunns is the first step down that slippery slope to the confiscation of conventional firearms. the government would be able to track who owns which firearms by means of those microchips. that is the argument. president has come out with this directive to do research. will that make a difference? some money may be spent in some prototypes make it will. the prototypes are already out. people than trying to get this off the ground for a while. is question is whether there demand. the paradox is the biggest fans of smart guns are people who are basically skin -- got skeptics. -- gun skeptics. >> something new here is yes, we do have this tech elegy on our iphones and it doesn't work all the time. do you really want to chance it? >> that is another argument that's offered. there is something quite unusual about the firearm. without very well digital tech elegy. unlike your phone which has been improved by the vision of computerization, unlike your car or your refrigerator

least inweighed, at the inner circles of the gun rights move it, the and are elsewhere, by the fear thatmartphones is the first step towards that. -- smart guns is the first step towards that. >> they just came out with this directive to do this research. will that make a difference? >> it may make a difference in that some money will be spent and some prototypes make it -- may get built. but the prototypes are out there. so the question really is whether there is demand. whether gunowners really want to buy these things. that the biggest fans of smart guns are those who are gone skeptics. armwill more opposed to fire ownership. theseething you hear from rights groups is that we do have technology onnt our iphones at it is not work all the time. if you were buying a gun self-defense and is do you want to chance it is that fingerprints answer is not going to work when you want it? >> that is another argument that is offered. there is something quite unusual about the firearm, generally speaking. it works very well without to digital technology. unlike your phone, which has by the addition

least inweighed, at the inner circles of the gun rights movement, the nra and elsewhere by the fear that move toward smart guns is a first step down the proverbial slippery slope toward the confiscation of conventional firearms and then a situation where the government will be able to track who owns which firearm by means of those microchips. that, anyway, is the argument. carol: president obama has come out with a directive to do research. will that make a difference? paul: it may make a difference and that money will be spent and prototypes may get built. the fact is that the prototypes are already out there. they are available. people have in trying to get this off the ground for a wild. the question really is whether there is demand? whether gun owners really want to buy these things. the paradox is that the biggest fans of smart guns are people who are basically done skeptics. -- gun skeptics. people opposed to gunfire on ownership. the key is to win over the gun owning circles. drake: something you hear from gun rights groups is yes, we have this finger print technology on our ipho