robbed inyears, they oklahoma and kansas. he held something of a robin hood image and was well-liked by many so it was those people who helped him and his gang avoid the law. the gang was dissolved when bill was tracked down and killed in 1896. curry, known kid as the wildest in butch cassidy's outlaw gang known as the wild bunch. that also included the sundance kid, bill carver and many others. some of them posed for a photo in 1901, which i have put on the screen for you. funnily enough, pinkertons learned about the photo, got a copy of it, and put it across america. so probably a bad idea. wanted for 50 murders and was generally believed that murdered at least twice that number. william pinkerton called him the most vicious outlaw in america he has no single redeeming features. he is the only outlaw for which there is no good point. >> which when izzy? -- which one is he? >> that is a good question. i have not spent enough time looking into it to truly answer that question. and then there was cherokee bill, crawford colby.

and wanted to go to your comment that covid19 presents us with a complete and thorough autopsy of inyearsf neoliberalism india. your final comment? well, when, as i said, it has shown us what these polilies on food -- for instanance, for 35 years, we all accecepted t that health care es someththing to be bought, sold, trtraded, an that health insurancnce equals healtlth. this is neoliberalism. we havave a country where thee ximum amount of the health system is s in private hands. i mean, where the maximum expenditure on health is from four peoplple from their own ckets. that is one on t the health.h. on the education system, now whatat happens on the rich schoo and the colleges and p private universities will switch to online education. wh happens to ththe tens of mimillions of childreren? what happens to the tetens off millions of children in governmentnt schools where you'e looking to have decent blackboaoard? what happens too that? so the education s systems smasashed. this was alslso the pushing of so-called affofordable private schos. all this came with neoliberalism. so we have been

i would be happy t to explain to me the loop of 65% of the exterior walls measured in inyear feet --inear feet at the foundation level. that is straightforward. you can go to the property information map and igyo figuret out. i would love to understand why that is so complicated. maybe we should go to mandelman and hear his comments. >> i wasn't done. i absolutely agree with what you said. i have seen and experienced the amount of homes in the city and i know they are trying to stop rebuilding of monster homes. what i want to hear why we are moving and and/or. what i was referring to in district 11 is people trying to do simple additions to add on to their home. if the planning department says changing and to or in the b would begin to capture rear additions, i don't think that is what you are trying to do. i know that is not what we are trying to stop in supervisor mandelman's district. my point was to say that could potentially expand the number of projects around the city captured under this new definition. that is what i ask you to respond to. i didn't think you are trying to cap

i would be happy t to explain to me the loop of 65% of the exterior walls measured in inyear feet --inear feet at the foundation level. that is straightforward. you can go to the property information map and igyo figuret out. i would love to understand why that is so complicated. maybe we should go to mandelman and hear his comments. >> i wasn't done. i absolutely agree with what you said. i have seen and experienced the amount of homes in the city and i know they are trying to stop rebuilding of monster homes. what i want to hear why we are moving and and/or. what i was referring to in district 11 is people trying to do simple additions to add on to their home. if the planning department says changing and to or in the b would begin to capture rear additions, i don't think that is what you are trying to do. i know that is not what we are trying to stop in supervisor mandelman's district. my point was to say that could potentially expand the number of projects around the city captured under this new definition. that is what i ask you to respond to. i didn't think you are trying to cap

i would be happy t to explain to me the loop of 65% of the exterior walls measured in inyear feet --inear feet at the foundation level. that is straightforward. you can go to the property information map and igyo figuret out. i would love to understand why that is so complicated. maybe we should go to mandelman and hear his comments. >> i wasn't done. i absolutely agree with what you said. i have seen and experienced the amount of homes in the city and i know they are trying to stop rebuilding of monster homes. what i want to hear why we are moving and and/or. what i was referring to in district 11 is people trying to do simple additions to add on to their home. if the planning department says changing and to or in the b would begin to capture rear additions, i don't think that is what you are trying to do. i know that is not what we are trying to stop in supervisor mandelman's district. my point was to say that could potentially expand the number of projects around the city captured under this new definition. that is what i ask you to respond to. i didn't think you are trying to cap