and my view is the ioc has a rule, probably appropriately, to restrict political speech and protestsfield of play at the olympics and my point is simply that being anti-racist is not political. and we have seen some other leagues do incredible things the nba has done incredible work the wnba has done incredible work mls, even european soccer has done a great job of allowing athletes to have a voice, have their -- whether it's to take a knee in unity, moments of silence, some messages on their jerseys as the nba has done. those are appropriate and thoughtful around a subject in my mind that is absolutely the standard which we all need to operate which is sort of no racism is acceptable and my point to the ioc was this is the reality we live in. this is the standard we should all hold ourselves to. and the ioc has a platform and it's going to happen and they ought to create an environment where they create an opportunity for the athletes to have a voice on how and when and where it happens. that is not all political speech all the time this is anti-racism, speech protests, opportunity

acquisitions this is a company that was getting very focused to the next wave of computing being exposed to ioc obviously this is good news. it's fine. do we want them to make another expensive acquisition? maybe. they haven't integrated the other two very well just yet in the meantime i think this is probably good for investor sentiment. i want to make one other point about lori and the wobble and the market i think this is an interesting week yesterday the s&p 500 made that new all-time high, a day later apple trades of $2 trillion for the first time ever. i think it's really interesting to put those two facts together and consider one thing, that yesterday only 6% of the s&p 500 made new all-time highs. the breadth is getting narrower and narrower and these names like apple and microsoft and google and amazon are doing all the heavy lifting here i think you could throw a dart at your board and you would see any stock it hits down a month from now i don't see how this poor breadth can persist when you have so many stocks acting so poorly regul lly relative to th. >> absolutely agree. those fi

we need to keep the pressure on the ioc to come forward in a more forthcoming way. >> so as far as you're concerned, the intelligence community has not, not been forthcoming enough in alerting the public. >> i think there is an ongoing debate in the intelligence community. listen, the intelligence community by their just very nature likes to keep things secret. and then you do have to protect sources and methods. but at the end of the day, their customer in this case, as my colleague angus king said, usually the ic's customer is another part of the intelligence community or the president or congress. but their customer in this case is the american public. and i think they owe the american public to err on the side of further disclosure so that people don't get tricked, so we don't say a month from now or two months from now, some story splashes out there, and it would then be traced back to russia. why weren't we warned of that ahead of time? >> let me ask you about mail-in voting, because the president praised florida, again, led by a republican governor, and ally, and where he votes, th

and we still need to await what specific tools the fed will announce in roughly two weeks meeting but ioche market is pricing a little more of the things they can do. at least there is the old toll of guidance and asset purchases and maybe something along the lines of potentially what else they could do would be released at the meeting. rishaad: i want to have a look at credit in this part of the world and get your views particularly on chinese credit and some of these bondholders. they are in trouble. the government has been issuing debt in china. how have you been looking at it? in china, we have seen the economy in terms of the normalization and recovery to be surprisingly rapid and almost anticlimactic. the policymakers now can afford to be more patient and from our standpoint, that gives them more -- that givese them more room to ease if there are hiccups. it is not a bad place to be on china local currency bonds. in some safe off haven characteristics and could provide a good hedge along with increasesusion and along the way. u.s. and, even with china names, we think with the underl

while her medals came from ioc competitions bowling is still not an official olympic sport and gg hopes know, bowling is extremely popular, guys. 69 million americans hitting the lanes at least once a year. 69 million. >> i remember growing up, robin. my mom was in ray bowling league. my sister was in ray bowling league and love gg's story but i love the fact that we found out you were really the state bowling champ in mississippi. r? i've been telling you this. you didn't believe me? that's why we had to dig up this -- we got the proof in this article. and let me tell you i believe that's the last time i was referred to as being petite but i'll take it. it was a great time but gg is a marvelous young woman on the pro tour. they don't have it this year because of covid. she's been working really hard and bringing exposure and just wants everybody to know it is a great sport for all. i should have known your mom was a bowler. >> you gave her a run for your money. your form is on point. i'm not messing with you. >> thank you. i had a 144, not bad. cobweb, not bad but let's go bowling, guy

and ioc olympic committees in order to try and keep our policies parallel around the participation of transgendered athletes in intercollegiate athletics but in first to admit it is a very, very challenging issue to find the right balance. >> i'm out of time -- >> we will do a second round. >> mr. chairman, i do ask unanimous consent to place into the record declarations made by three female ncaa athletes regarding their experience competing against transgender athletes. these declarations were filed challenging the idaho fairness in women's sports act. >> without objection. i think senator hawley -- is anybody, democratic side -- senator hawley. >> thank you, mr. chairman. thanks to the witnesses for being here. can we come back to the antitrust issue if we could? could ask you to wait in? could you give us your views, i have read your written testimony, give us your views about the liability limitation issue four of us antitrust violations? are you in favor of the ncaa's request? >> thank you for that question. we oppose all hardly. it was interesting, in mr. emmett till for stateme