ioi heard it overand overagain. i heard it in the 90s how do i couldn't respond to that? >> well, one, it doesn't matter. if it's good vouchers are fine. more on the point, i think. at the time of the discussion 15 to 20 years ago the dominant medicare program was the service program and defined contribution looked different in an unfamiliar and it was easy to scareit seniors. they privatetize and they work everywhere else. so, now with medicare advantage you have subsidy from the government and private come ticks plan.ck you pick the one you want. it's the most popular form of medicare. more than a half million beginning next year. it doesn't look that different. people have voucherized the medicare voluntarily. we aree just trying to improve the quality of what they get. >> i know, the thing that's remarkable about this i was at the democratic national convention. it was a few convictions ago. basically they would give them the voucher and negotiate with a private healthce insurance. this was the source and the idea i got into s a rather spirited debate with someone in

i started to hear that vision , but also ioi was deeply inspired by that kindness. and respect that he showed for every american. and when i moved to indianapolis after i graduated i literally as i recount in the book walked to the local republican s headquarters and said i'm here to sign up for the republican party. and this rather large county chairman looked at me behind his desk and said it's not really something you sign up for but we're glad to have you. but i joined the reagan revolution and never looked back . but it was his vision for a strong national defense under the constitution, traditional moral values. but also it was a heart and a gentleness and the way that he spoke, deep conviction, that gentleness and respect that will always inspire me as long as i live. the life and work in the example of ronald reagan. >> you just mentioned in talking about the vision of ronald reagan smaller government . what ever happened to republicans and smaller government. >> i try and capture that a little bit. i ran for congress in 1988 when reagan was still in the whi

and your star season premiere soon on first, we continue our conversation about space education with ioy ovchinnikov and i'm anton shkaplerov. and for the little ones. yes, we said, these are the first classes. which ones to involve in such events. listen exactly to the outer space the same. here is a satellite to pick up to twist and say you have collected a satellite to let him see the map to take satellites. well, map him from the satellite to show him how this signal is being received. just to have it behold this buzz that is interference. yes, there at the frequency of ultra short waves, where some kind of picture is transmitted there and so that he can see how the picture appears, so that he can collect it with his hands. what kind of mosaic is there, well, robotic designers connected with ships. but through this and setting the tone yet, as it were, a cosmic binding. they understand that they are not just assembling a robot that rolls on the ground, but there it collects lunar soil or something else , we even have something like young professionals and roskosmos also support this

pate, 2020, 21, just under- compensates the cost to society, the excise pate, 2020, 21, just under ioiosts to society in 2019 for example overall. but- billion it costs to society in 2019 for example overall.— billion it costs to society in 2019 for example overall. but there we are. for example overall. but there we are- some — for example overall. but there we are. some interesting _ for example overall. but there we are. some interesting ones. - for example overall. but there we | are. some interesting ones. some fascinating facts and figures all the way through. i have got the countries where there is no smoking in the world but i will come to those in a second but let's go to darren in clapham. stephen is still with us. and to visit, alison coming up? darren, good morning, your point could? i up? darren, good morning, your point could? .., , , up? darren, good morning, your point could? , , ., could? i completely agree with deborah. could? i completely agree with deborah- in — could? i completely agree with deborah. in terms _ could? i completely agree with deborah. in terms of— c