. >> secretary ionin: thank you, mr. witting. >> president hillis: thank you, mr. witting. >> hi. good morning. i don't know if you read what was in the packet that i sent. i sent to you a packet, but you know, there were those e-mails back from january 2015, and i didn't intend those to say, like, oh, my god, this has been going on forever, 'cause it has been, but this -- no one's really responsible. i feel responsible because i didn't push more for the planning commission to adjust the numerical calculations and the democalcs. that could have been helpful in the 317, but maybe not based on what miss waddie presented this morning because of how tricky they are. you have the groupings. maybe if they are all ors, that would be good, but it's still arcane. with all respect to the good people, who thought one definition of demolition would solve the problem, i respectfully agree. clear-cut demos, flat lotting, demos like that that now skirt the rules, demos that don't skirt the rules under the now tantamount to demolition. if you look back in 2007, the reason for tantamount to demoli