in particular i wanted to focus on your citation of sea level rise data from the ipc sea i hope you are aware that only accounted for thermal expansion of the ocean ignores the sea level rise that from the melting glacial ice. and i would hope you stop doing that and honestly account for how the teeth three presented the sea level rise data program like your response specifically. >> it does in fact, allow for the loss of glacial ice, it does not allow for the notion that agreed land will rapidly shed the ice field which is the climate crisis of the day. and in the book this is the notion that jim hansen has popular is that the sea level could rise 20 feet by the year 2100. because the warming of three dreamland will create a water flow under the ice cap that will accelerate. but this is well and good as we point* out in the book a very large study that is indisputable because it is geographical links shows that in eurasia, siberia, scandinavia, , etc., that for millennia, i did not say 100 years, for a millennia, july temperatures were as much as seven degrees celsius warmer than what