i don't feel that the ipcc are in control of the investigation at all.age it goes, what pace it goes, which is disgusting. i think we had to fight the police to listen, and now we're having to do the same for the ipcc to move onto the next stage. stephen port used dating apps to lure the men to his home. he then gave them lethal doses of ghb. his first victim, anthony walgate, was found outside the door of port‘s flat, the others in or near the local churchyard over the next 15 months. the police were asked on numerous occasions if the deaths could be linked. the ipcc investigation is designed to work out why detectives were so reluctant to connect them. but 20 months on, not a single police officer has been questioned. the bbc has been told that the independent police complaints commission investigation team is itself frustrated and dismayed by the delay in interviewing the officers. i understand that's being caused by the officers, the police federation and their lawyers asking for more time to examine the 7000 pages of evidence. though in public today

i don't feel that the ipcc are in control of the investigation at all.oes, what pace it goes, which is disgusting. i think we had to fight the police to listen, and now we're having to do the same for the ipcc to move onto the next stage. stephen port used dating apps to lure the men to his home. he then gave them lethal doses of ghb. his first victim, anthony walgate, was found outside the door of port‘s flat, the others in or near the local churchyard over the next 15 months. the police were asked on numerous occasions if the deaths could be linked. the ipcc investigation is designed to work out why detectives were so reluctant to connect them. but 20 months on, not a single police officer has been questioned. the bbc has been told that the independent police complaints commission investigation team is itself frustrated and dismayed by the delay in interviewing the officers. i understand that's being caused by the officers, the police federation and their lawyers asking for more time to examine the 7000 pages of evidence. though in public today, the ip

i don't feel that the ipcc are in control of the investigation at all.ctating to what stage it goes, what pace it goes, which is disgusting. stephen port used dating apps to lure the men to his home. he then gave them lethal doses of ghb. his first victim, anthony walgate, was found at the door of his flat. the others, in nor near the local churchyard over the next 15 months. the police were asked on numerous occasions if the deaths could be linked. the ipcc investigation is designed to work out why detectives were so reluctant to connect them, but 20 months on, not a single police officer has been questioned. the explanation for the further delay is an argument between the independent police complaints commission on the one side and the police officers, the police federation and their lawyers on the other side, over the amount of time it would take to go through the 7000 pages of evidence and 750 emails. but while the two sides argue, the families are getting no closer to the truth. the ipcc denied that there has been a row, saying the officers have ask

that science -- that's where it all came from was the ipcc. crif the financial times said, this is a quote, the closed mindedness of these supposed men of science, their willingness to go to any length to defend a preconceived message is surprising to me. the stink of intellectual corruption is overpowering. i assumed at that time that would end them as providing the science and justification for passing what would have been the largest tax increase in the history of this country. so anyway, back to the issue here. several of us feel to avoid all this from happening, the best way to do it is have this president when he gets back from his trip do what he campaigned on and pull out of the paris agreement. and i anticipate that he will do that. with that i -- i yield. a senator: mr. president? the presiding officer: the senator from missouri. a senator: mr. president, this weekend will mark the beginning of the memorial day remembrances that we do every year. mr. blunt: memorial day of course on monday but many activities will begin even today an

i don't feel that the ipcc are in control of the investigation at all.. stephen port used dating apps to lure the men to his home. he then gave them lethal doses of ghb. his first victim, anthony walgate, was found at the door of his flat. the others, in nor near the local churchyard over the next 15 months. the police were asked on numerous occasions if the deaths could be linked. the ipcc investigation is designed to work out why detectives were so reluctant to connect them, but 20 months on, not a single police officer has been questioned. the best explanation for the further delay is an argument between the independent police complaints commission on the one side and the police officers, the police federation and their lawyers on the other side, over the amount of time it would take to go through the 7000 pages of evidence and 750 emails. but while the two sides argue, the families are getting no closer to the truth. the ipcc denied that there has been a row, saying the officers have asked for time to understand and absorb the information that will b

. —— ipcc. but they say that while the plan was good, they were yet to see action. —— ipc.issuing the russians with one final warning before pyeongchang. the thing is that we have already stated today that we have not seen sufficient progress for them to be reinstated. therefore, the consequence of that, if not reinstated, they would not be in pyeongchang. shouldn't they be punished, properly, for what the final mclaren report showed, which came after your initial suspension, asa came after your initial suspension, as a deterrent? i think they are very fully aware of what they need to do, we can go down the punishment route, all we can go down the far more positive root of getting things fixed. everybody knows that what they did was... das diddley, any word you would wish to use for it, why did we have to react in the way that we did? —— dastardly. but we will maintain that action until we see concrete change. to miss one would—be bad for russia, to miss two, would be very bad indeed, russia topped the winter olympics medal table in such a, it would go down badly indeed, th

because the ipcc's climate models have all been wrong. temperature is supposed to go up. hasn't. >> well, what's happened is the growth rate has moderated. these models have had some issues of accurate predictions, but this isn't a death nell for u.s. industry, i think it's a massive opportunity. john: i think they're a mob, thank you, tyson. if you can join this argument, follow me on twitter, fbn stossel, use hashtag mob rule, or "like" the facebook page so you can post on my wall. >>> coming up, the mob against the koch brothers. a rape culture mob. the buy america mob. >>> next, when there were riots in ferguson, who was the mob? the protesters or the police? i love kiwis. i've always had that issue with the seeds getting under my denture. super poligrip free. it creates a seal of the dentures in my mouth. just a few dabs is clinically proven to seal out more food particles. try super poligrip free. looking from a fresh perspective can make all the difference. it can provide what we call an unlock: a realization that often reveals a better path forward. at wells fargo

see said, well, on the ipcc, the intergovernmental panel on climate change. and she -- and -- now, as -- i wouldn't say as luck would have it, but it's kind of coincidental. right after that statement is when the big scandal that was referred to as climategate came along. it was -- they discovered that the scientists that were with ipcc were not getting the results this that he wants, so they rigged the science. and they were caught doing it with e-mails. so that there wasn't any question as to what they were trying to do. that totally defused

there was an ipcc, a global unireport, at one point said that the himalayan glaciers were going to meltithin our lifetime. this turned out not to be true. the skeptics, or the genuine deniers, obviously, pounced on this detail. so, the column was an attempt to be was a warning against intellectual hubris. not an effort to deny facts about climate that have been agreed by the scientific community. and i think that's a distinction that i'm afraid was lost in some of the more intemperate criticism. but people who read the column can see i said nothing outrageous or beyond the pale of normal discussion. >> as always certainly the best answer to these kind of things is not to try to silence people or drum them out but to answer them. to have a vigorous response and a vigorous debate which is what you provoked i think in that. so i was very grateful for it. next on gps, why in the world are so many paying passengers getting kicked off planes in america? it is all about the fine print, the economics, and laws. i'll explain when we come back. ♪ you might not ever just stand there, looking at it

the ipcc have been clearer about mistakes made in the past and i have apologised to the lewis family investigations then a judicial review and now a jury then a judicial review and now a jury inquest. there was another inquiry by the health and safety executive. there was another investigation. so, yes, each stage you feel thwarted, you have to keep fighting, it is a struggle. you keep going. you keep going? yes. we have to. that is what we have been doing. what about the impact on your wider family? we have two other children and two grandchildren and we try our best as a family to keep ourselves going and motivate each other, be there for each other and encourage there for each other and encourage the grandchildren. it is hard some days. you know, each day can be different. you have given us a little bit of an insight into what your son was like, tell us what he was like. he was a young man, he liked his clothes, he had an eye for a pretty girl, you know. he was fun loving, he had loads of friends, he hated injustice and would stick up for anybody. he did not like bullies. it is in