so if climate scientists who works with the ipcc, who is the most famous or the most i think famous proponentof this technology. so this guy is like we bought this stuff, it's great. we should do it. it's amazing when he sees proposals that are like, oh, let's do it first so we can like wean ourselves off excise. he's like, whoa, no, no, dude, what are you talking about? he's like, this is for mop up duty in a of sectors, and it only actually is a net positive move after you've done an energy transition. and again, a lot of these studies come of like we just so when you say all the net positive after you've done energy transition, that means literally if i currently shove an existing carbon capture device onto a coal power plant, it actually net total's increased emissions now for several reasons. one, you got to build the -- thing -- is maybe not too bad precursor you got to build thing you got to move the thing you got to get it in install and etc. etc. everything you make has environmental impact. it's hard to remember. that's right. even the solar panels, even the windmills all have impac