asi he was under the ipp system. court of appeal and it was changed to a fixed term sentence, which meant he was released automatically at halfway through his adult sentence, as most adults are. there are only a few exceptions to that general rule. so the law hasn't worked as parliament prescribed. parliament has set out these rules, and everything went as it was required to do so. itjust goes to show, perhaps, if the reports are right that he was adhering to all of his licence conditions, had permission to be where he was an so on, it goes to show how hard it is to actually make sure people don't reoffend unless you have really changed their mind set, and you've got an opportunity to do that when someone is in prison and afterwards if you put the resources into making sure that people learn lessons and don't go back to offending. it is across all crime, though. wouldn't part of this also go right back to the first point of the sentencing process? as i understand it, judges will receive a report from probation, and t

presumably he was under the ipp system. he was sentenced under the ipp system.e went to the court of appeal and changed to a determinant sentence, fixed term sentence which meant he was then released automatically halfway through his adult sentence, like most adults are. there are only a few exceptions to that rule. the law has workers parliament prescribed. parliament set out these rules and everything went as it was required to do so. itjust goes to show perhaps, if the reports are right, that he was adhering to all his license conditions and had permission to be where he was, it goes to show how hard it is to actually make sure people do not reoffend unless you have really change their mindset and you have an opportunity to do that when somebody is in prison and you have an opportunity to do that afterwards if you put resources into making sure that people learn lessons and do not return to offending. it is across all crime, however. wouldn't part of this also go right back to the first point of the sentencing process. as i understand it, judges will receive

he was sentenced under the ipp system, as i read the reports off the press, his case went to the courtthat is a fixed term sentence, which meant that he was then released automatically halfway through his adult sentence, like most adults are. there are only a few exceptions to the general rule. and so the law has worked as parliament prescribed. parliament has set out these rules and everything went it was required to do so. itjust goes to show, perhaps, if the reports are right, that he was adhering to all of his licence conditions and he had permission to be where he was meant to be and so on and so forth, it goes to show how hard it is to actually make sure that people don't reoffend unless you have really changed their mindset. and you have got an opportunity to do that when somebody is in prison and you've got an opportunity to do that afterwards, if you put the resources into making sure that people learn lessons and don't go back to offending. it is across all crime, though. it's gone from remote wilderness to tourist hotspot — in just a few decades. antarctica is now the destin

the reason that this man appears to have been given the initial ipp sentence you talked about, thesey being released if they continue to pose a risk to the public, if they continued to be dangerous. i think that is why there we re dangerous. i think that is why there were serious concerns when the ipp sentences were abolished back in 2012, and there isn't a similar provision in place now. but also, there is a question about, why was there is a question about, why was there no assessment at all? were there no assessment at all? were there really no assessment at all of there really no assessment at all of the risk that this individual posed, or of what action might need to be taken in response to that, given what we have obviously seen, and the events that have unfolded sense? as isaid, we events that have unfolded sense? as i said, we are waiting for a statement from the counterterrorism chief assistant commissioner at scotla nd chief assistant commissioner at scotland yard. just on this question, yvette cooper, of the attempt to de—radicalise those who have been radicalised, and the

i guess i want to make that point there are differences between what k ipp seems to offer and our schools offer. i want to highlight the idea there is transparency in parent advocacy. we have seen a lot tonight. it is not always easy to listen to the community members talking about what they feel the district is doing so. we have meetings twice a month. during committee meetings those are all records. as far as what i can see on the kipp website, they only meet three times each year. so far theyment in oakland. i could not find meeting minutes. from last year it was four pages long. there is no place to go. you can't rewind and hear. you could go back and hear what i'm saying. definitely not with the area schools. additionally, i looked in terms of comparable. i think about teacher experience. they talk about training because they have a lot of new teachers. >> the average years of service is two years. that is the aftervage. if they say it is because people leave. you could start as teacher and never get to be the english chair because people stay. the average years of service in sfusd i

so that if you -- if an ipp said, we've got 15 projects and the faa says we'll go with three rid now and that left a lot of good work done so it needs to have more fa resources. it needs to be extended and it needs to be broadened. >> ms. nelson, you testified that three airlines now have your members have negotiated any agreements with the rule and delta's made an announcement, as well, and any concerns that the markets are getting ahead of the faa, but that the faa is behind -- it is behind the market, and in that -- will the faa be able to market the rule that conforms to what your members and the airlines are actually negotiating? >> well, we have negotiated this language that mirrors what was written in the law and it is the exact same. there's no conflict there at all, and i should also note that horizon air has agreed to implement this outside of contract negotiations, as well, but there is a big difference between having negotiated contract language and having a regulation that the airlines must follow and must follow through with and expect that there will be enforcement fro

add the to the administrator's comments from the department of transportation perspective with the ipp allows insofar as it's possible for regulatory agency to become a cutting-edge regulator this allows us to be on the cutting-edge of integrating drones safely into our manned air space. other countries are experimenting as we are but what they are doing is mostly on catch as catch can. we're trying to develop the system adequately so we can have the regulations in place based on these pilot programs that will allow us to give, for example for certifications. whatever lessons we learned can be applied nationally. >> talk about the role of local and state government and interface there and how that will operate. >> so, that wasn't in the presidential directive, something we wanted the ipp, the nine different programs to examine. federalism versus preelmtion and it's a great question. what we don't want to foster are hundreds of different regulatory frame works that the industry would eventually have to comply with. you know if i'm in this county i got to do this. at the same time we hav

and i opposed the decision from the government to get rid of a sentence that he has had which is in ipp serious person found guilty of a serious offence. that is one of the concerns i have. another is that i have personally seen as a former lawyer and a former justice secretary and as the london mayor, the consequences of huge cuts in the ministry ofjustice, the probation service being privatised, aside from the cuts in police and that must have an impact on the ability of the supervision and rehabilitation of such men. it is really important that there is a proper review to see whether lessons can be learned, because are correct, we must make sure that we are doing all that we can to keep us safe and that includes sentences available to judges, other it was right to remove the ipp and bother the cuts that have made consequences on this issue. i don't really want to go too much down the political line this morning, the focus must be...” much down the political line this morning, the focus must be... i am really sorry, but you asked me the question about the sentence given to this man, a

with acute inpatient care using the inpatient prospective payment system or what is referred to as ipps. congress enacted the perspective payment system to constrain the growth of medicare's inpatient hospital payments by providing incentives for those facilities to provide care more efficiently. congress also requires that the concept of budget neutrality be applied to a number of medicare payment systems, including provider payments. in other words, it's this simple. the government says if one provider gets an increase, another provider is reduced. finally, the senate -- the center for medicare and medicaid innovation within c.m.s. is required by statute to enforce financial controls on total medicare spending. the center for innovation can only test different ways to pay for services in medicare and medicaid if they're expected to lower costs while maintaining quality. so this idea of using taxpayer dollars responsibly and in a targeted manner exists in many facets of the american health care system. so my point is this. while some call the inflationary rebate in part b a price contr