being played for a fool by iran russia china, of course mexico and the rest of this hemisphere. in his 2008 campaign mr. obama presented himself as the great uniter. he has turned out to be the great divider. during his tenure race relations have profoundly worsened. nearly 6 in 10 americans now say race relations in this country are bad. mr. obama promised his administration would be the most open and transparent it has been the least such. defying congress and the news media and denying access to government records at an unprecedented rate and level. but his most frightening statement today, his claim that he could win a third term. why is it so frightening? it's so much closer to the truth than anything else he said today. mr. obama and our national liberal media are allies. and 40% of the electorate follows obama it seems blindly. all of whom seem to care little about the direction in which he is leading us all. the constitution is all that stands between this president and a third term. and frankly, i've never been more afraid that our constitution is in peril. a quotation

the three greatest villains, russia, iran and china. russia and iran being the worst.ow the iranians to build a bomb and we've just done that, and you allow the russians and the chinese to establish a sort of like a naval alliance in the northern pacific, slowly but surely america's influence in the world and the middle east because iran is going to be a nuclear power in the northern pacific because we have alliance between china and russia, american power and the perception continues to erode, lou. lou: and that seems, i think, to most people abstract. it seems distant. but we're talking about a 60 day existing breakout period for creating a weapon irrespective of this deal, that may elongate if any part of anything this administration has said were true and the iranians meant any part of what they inside reaching this deal. is this not the same thing? the administration could as much deliver one of our nuclear weapons to tehran tomorrow. isn't that effectively the result? >> absolutely. you know this whole idea that we hear from the administration is there will be a

>> there's a procedure in place but it doesn't rely on iran or russia or china saying yes. >> so iran is wrong when they say we won't have access to military sites? >> no they are taking care of a domestic constituency in the way they feel they need to -- >> thank you. >> what they say is not as important as what they do. >> i will remind the members, we have five members. ask the question and give enough time for a response. >> mr. chairman -- >> what we are going to do is have a response for the record. we are going to go to mr. brad sherman of california. >> we have to remember that this is not a binding deal. this is not a treaty. this is not binding on iran. this is not binding on the united states. it's not even an executive legislative agreement and these question here are not even asking for congress to approve the deal. i think they would appreciate it if we didn't pass a formal resolution of disapproval. it might be at most morally binding on this administration. so what may be important for us is to look to see whether it's a good deal in the next couple of years, because i

in iran they are not chanting death to china, death to russia, death to france. they are chanting "death to america." bill: over the weekend the president had pointed word for benjamin netanyahu. but i don't think anyone was surprised by that comment. i think what surprised a lot of people was this comment from last week last wednesday. if those hardliners were most comfortable with the status quo. it's the hardliners chanting death to america who have been most opposed to the deal. they are make common cause with the republican caucus. bill: the common cause is the phrase here. he said what i said is absolutely true factually. but since then chuck schumer came out and said he will not go for this deal. are they making common cause with the hard liners in iran? >> he said it's just the hard liners in iran to dismiss them. the hardliners are not some people in a rally in downtown tehran. they are the bosses of the country and the people month negotiated the deal. to say if you don't want my deal you have must want war, the president has no other options i ghes his

russia, and it should be trying to integrate. we are now a radiance china and russia, two nuclear powers in participation and alliance with iran, andy were part of the architecture of the deal in negotiations when presented to the security council supporting it. is everyone in this administration when it comes to national security and foreign policy taking leave of their senses? >> this is they're clear ideology. the united states is too powerful, too successful, and if they can show that we do not harbor ill intentions the iranians will say that is good to no. the president has been taken to the cleaners not simply by the iranians but by the russians, chinese, and our supposedly european allies. the deal is a disaster. lou: bloody hell. does this president think that this is leadership? he is being run over by a massive ideological machine in the form of a iran and russia and china and the indifference in their decision to vote on the part of the uk and france. >> and if you think about what ayn rand, russia, and china have in common, they want to build there own empires and need to push the united states to continue what it has b

based on the appellate process any action to which iran objects would be subject to review by the other parties, including iran china and russia. we've potentially converted the iranian sanctions into one in which the target had the right to challenge and an internet venue in which to do it. this is done in support of parties that do not like or want to see the use of u.s. pour and influence. it might drive a weblg between the u.s. and europe moving forward. and all of this will temper our aggressive moves against iran. mr. chairman, the spirit and letter of the agreement may leverage our financial power in the future. with the start in the negotiation, what the iranians want most was the ability to do business again, unfettered and unplugged back into the global system. the regime has needed access to banking, shipping, insurance technologies and connectivity to global markets. that is what they lost over the last decade and that is what they gained and guaranteed in this deal. the u.s. will need to amplify measures against key elements of the iranian economy to deal with increased risks. it is not at all clear that this is w

instead, there is managed access with iran russia and china having a say in where international inspectors can and can't go. the deal's 24-day process is a far cry from anywhere any time. and this provision expires, too. while the administration has processed absolute knowledge about iran's program it is a fact that we have been surprised by most every major nuclear development in iran's history i ask, mr. secretary, has iran earned the right to be trusted? this deal guts the sanctions web that is putting intense pressure on iran. virtually all economic, financial and energy sanctions disappear. and where does all that money go? to the largest terror network on earth. gone are the sanctions on iran's nuclear program, but also on the bad banks that have supported iran's terrorism and blilzallistic missile development and to our dismay iran won a late concession to remove restrictions on its ballistic missile program and conventional arms imperilling the security of the region and our homeland if this agreement goes through, iran gets a cash bonanza a boost to its international standing and

sanctions are related action to which iran objects would be subject to review by the other party including iran, china and russia. we potentially converted the iran sanctions program into one in which the target has a neat right to challenge an international venue in which to do it. this will be done with the support of parties that do not like i want the city is that he financial power and influence. and may even drive a wedge between the u.s. and europe moving forward. at a minimum all this will temper our financial toast against iran. mr. chairman, this. the letter of the agreement may neuter usability leverage our financial power in the future. from the start of negotiations with the reins wanted most was the ability to do business again i'm fettered and unplugged back into the global system. the regime has been access to banking, shipping, insurance, new technologies and connectivity to global markets. that is what de-loft over the past decade, that appears to what they have gained in guaranteed in this deal. u.s. money to amplify pages of financial measures aggressively against the comments of the a ring e

interim deal, a deal that rolled back iran's stockpile of near 20% enriched uranium and froze the process. -- progress of its programs so that the united states, china, russia, united kingdom, germany, france, and the european union could negotiate a conference of deal-- comprehensive without the fear that iran might be stalling for time. let me pause here just to remind that when the interim deal was announced, critics, the same critics we are hearing from now, called it a historic mistake. they insisted iran would ignore its obligations. they warned the sanctions would unravel. they warned that iran would receive a windfall to support terrorism. the critics were wrong. the progress of iran's nuclear program was halted for the first time in a decade. it's stockpile of dangerous materials was reduced. the deployment of its advanced centrifuges was stopped. inspections did increase. there was no flood of money into iran. and the architecture of the international sanctions remained in place. in fact, the interim deal worked so well that the same people who criticized it so fiercely now cite it as an excuse not to support the broader accord. think about that.

outsourcing the safety of the united states to all the terrorists in the united nations, to iran, and to russia, and to china. that's the bottom line. if you look at his overall strategy for defense of this country, it fits right in to his overall strategy. former four star jack keen who was on fox business. here's what he had to say about all this. >> how could you possibly vote on the deal when the heart of it has to be verification, and we don't know what verification means by the organization that's actually doing the inspecting. makes no sense. >> again, we deserve to know, don't we, john? >> you know, my long-standing view is why would we negotiate with irrelevant nations like iran? it diminishes us, and then it needlessly elevates what we all seem to agree is a corrupt regime. why would we expect them to do you trust iran to honor nuclear agreements? no. 75% say no. if you were in congress, how would you vote on the iran wran nuclear deal? 58% would reject it. >> yes. that's the sad thing, david. it only takes one-third of congress to get this thing through instead of the two-thirds. >> explain why th

iran. and how china and russia are twisting arms on capitol hill. our congress. that's right.ll take that up, and it's not necessarily what you would want to see right after your plane takes off, but this was the view. wow. that video coming right up. stay with us. much more straight ahead. ♪ ♪ lou: a few thoughts on the latest setback for president obama in his mad iranian nuclear deal push. in my commentary this past wednesday, i said that president obama risked major defections from congress, first, because the deal its -- itself is a farce and, secondly, because he took the deal to the united nations before he took it to congress. here's what i said. chuck schumer said he's undecided on whether to support the nuclear deal. i don't believe there's any doubt whatsoever that he will oppose the iran deal. the president has put a fool's bargain before him and all of the rest on capitol hill. and as predicted, senator schumer defied the president and opposes mr. obama's fool's bargain with iran. as i said, the senator's many things and, certainly, an adroit politician and media-

iran. and how china and russia are twisting arms on capitol hill. our congress. that's right.that up, and it's not necessarily what you would want to see right after your plane takes off, but this was the view. wow. that video coming right up. stay with us. much more straight ahead. ♪ ♪ technology empowers us to achieve more. it pushes us to go further. special olympics has almost five million athletes in 170 countries. the microsoft cloud allows us to immediately be able to access information, wherever we are. information for an athlete's medical care, or information to track their personal best. with microsoft cloud we save millions of man hours, and that's time that we can invest in our athletes and changing the world. i've smoked a lot and quit a lot but ended up nowhere. now i use this. the nicoderm cq patch, with unique extended release technology helps prevent the urge to smoke all day. i want this time to be my last time. that's why i choose nicoderm cq. lou: a few thoughts on the latest setback for president obama in his mad iranian nuclear deal push. in my commentary

iran. and how china and russia are twisting arms on capitol hill. our congress. that's right.that up, and it's not necessarily what you would want to see right after your plane takes off, but this was the view. wow. that video coming right up. stay with us. much more straight ahead. ♪ ♪ can a business have a mind? a subconscious. a knack for predicting the future. reflexes faster than the speed of thought. can a business have a spirit? can a business have a soul? can a business be...alive? this allergy season, will you be a sound sleeper, or a mouth breather. a mouth breather! well, put on a breathe right strip and shut your mouth. allergy medicines open your nose over time, but add a breathe right strip and pow! it instantly opens your nose up to 38% more. so you can breathe and sleep. add breathe right to your allergy medicine. shut your mouth and sleep right. breathe right and look for the calming scent of breathe right lavender in the sleep aisle. lou: a few thoughts on the latest setback for president obama in his mad iranian nuclear deal push. in my commentary this past

but we have kept them on far longer than iran russia or china wanted them on.ept them on article 41 chapter 7 which means they are enforceable enforceable. more importantly, we have other u.n. security council resolutions and other tools unilaterally to make sure that where arms are concerned and where missiles are concerned, we can keep moving forward in every way we need to. >> thank you. >> senator toomey? >> thank you mr. chairman. i thank the witnesses for appearing today. i want to go back to the issue that was raised by senator corker. ambassador sherman the iran nuclear review act of 2015 is abundantly clear i think, that congress is supposed to receive all the documentation, all the agreement, all the annexes all the related materials. it says in the beginning referring to the transmission of agreements, the president shall transmit to the appropriate congressional committees and leadership the agreement as defined in subsection h-1 including all related materials. subsection h-1 sayspecifies that this agreement includes any additional materials relate

iran, iraq, china, and russia. we will start the show with iran. last week you heard president obama make his case for the deal. >> that's not just good for the united states. that is very good for israel. >> today israel's ambassador to the united states makes the case against. >> we believe this threatens the survival of israel. >> china's currency is falling and world markets are trembling. why? i talked with the former ambassador to china and john huntsman. then why the world is russia destroying hundreds of tons of food when its own people are struggling to get by? finally a harvard law professor is running for president. really. he will explain why. but first here's my take. it's in the form of a letter. hear senator schumer. when you announced your decision to vote against the agreement with iran, you explained your reasons in a 1,700 word statement that is thoughtful in substance and civil in tone. yet in the end i found it unpersuasive. i believe that the agreement is fraught. but it is the most intrusive demanding and comprehensive set of

iran, iraq. china and russia. we'll start the show this week with iran.resident obama make his case for the deal. >> that's not just good for the united states. that is very good for israel. >>

for american leaders, some european leaders to realise that iran is a major player, and live with it, the same way they live with russia, chi chinahy not live with iran. if they decide to do that, they'll encourage forces in iran that are willing and able to accommodate western interest. one thing iran is willing to help the west with is confronting i.s.i.l. backing the government in the war against i.s.i.s., but in neighbouring sir i can't, where i.s.i.l. -- syria, where i.s.i.l. controls territory, iran and america work in opposing interests, because they back opposing sides. in almost every contentious area and issue facing the middle east, syria israel, yemen and the flow of oil to the world, iran and u.s. are on opposite sides. nowhere is it more apparent than in the strait of hore muse, a narrow waterway connecting oils with the gulf and indian ocean. at the narrowest points 21 miles separate iran. let me give you a sense how strategic a choke point there is. across the strait there's american military installations. iran considers it a threat and said it will mine the strait if attacked. it's done it again. the u.s. navy e

iran, china and russia. russia being roughly about 27 years. dealing with an administration in 70 month. they know what they want to get and are able to get it. >> can you describe i ran a little more closely? >> you look at the same consistent policies and ideology coming out of iran from the last 36 years. the same out of russia from the last 27 years, and also the same in china. you have our foreign policy and at least ebbs and flows. our adversaries take advantage of it based on who's in office. the next administration will have to deal with this actual, the jcpoa, the iran do. we are here in our circle that neither hillary nor joe biden want to understand if they don't want it around their necks because it's that bad. you have an advantage when you're an adversary do within the commission should that is leaving office in 70 month. when the president says iran will never get a bomb on my watch, in 17 months. it's that simple. we don't have a consistent ideology. we add the info. we can say we support the state official. some administration

iran, iraq, china, and russia. we will start the show with iran. president obama make his case for the deal. >> that's not just good for the united states. that is very good for israel. >> today israel's ambassador to the united states makes the case against. >> we believe this threatens the survival

sanctions which iran subjects would be subject to view by the other parties, including inran, -- iran, china, and russia. they have an immediate right to challenge in an international venue, this will be dealt with the support of parties that do not like or want to see u.s. financial power and influence. it may even drive a wedge between the u.s. and europe moving forward. at a minimum, this will number our use of financial tools against iran. the spirit and letter of the agreement may neuter u.s. agreement -- power in the future. from the start, what the iranians wanted most was the ability to do business again, unfettered and unplugged, back into the global system. the regime is needed access to banking, shipping, insurance, and new technologies. that is what they lost over the past decade, that appears to be what they have gained in this deal. the u.s. really to amplify its use of financial measures aggressively against key measures of the iranian economy to deal with increased risks. it is not at all clear that this is well understood by all parties, or even part of our strategy. we have the ability

if i am a company being targeted by china, russia, north korea, iran, or a soviet bloc crime unit, it is not a fair fight for china to triangulate on and cyber fight one company. we need a team america approach. we need to work as a team if we are going to identify and work against those threats. no one company, no matter how large they are, can do it by themselves. being able to communicate with governments and others is important. why that is helpful is that if you do it now, for example if i , think you have attacked me and i turn that information over to the government, would that be subject to the freedom of information act? if so, will the trailers get it and sue my company for negligence of data? will regulators yet it and throw me in jail or find me or sanction me? with the public's? will my creditors have access? will he give up a competitive advantage? we are saying there should be a law that if you give the government cyber information in good faith, that should be subject to legal safe harbors so those problems are addressed ahead of time. that is the main reason for the b

strengthen our computer networks against our adversaries whether they be nation states like china, russia and iran, or terrorist groups or international criminal gangs or hacktivists. mr. president, along with former senator joe lieberman i offered the terrorism prevention act of 2004. this bill implemented many of the recommendations of the 9/11 commission report in the wake of the al qaeda terrorist attack on our country that took the lives of nearly 3,000 people. many of the reforms enacted in our law were well known and recommended prior to far before the attacks on our country on 9/11. but they simply were never implemented despite the clear and present threat posed by al qaeda. today, mr. president my concern is that we are repeating much the same mistake when it comes to the cyber domain. our nation has unparalleled strength but cyberspace allows much weaker adversaries to target our people, our economy, and our military. just as modern passenger planes designed in the united states were turned against us and used as weapons back in september of 2001 so, too, could the digital tools designe

bases near the borders of countries such as china, russia, and iran increases that's to their securityand only encourages them to boost their military spending. imagine how u.s. leaders would respond if iran would build even a single base anywhere near u.s. borders, perhaps in mexico, canada, or the the caribbean. perhaps most troubling of all, the creation of new u.s. bases to print tact against a chinese threat runs the risk of becoming a self of prophecy. by provoking a chinese and russian military response it may help create an event. far for making the world safer place u.s. bases overseas can actually make war more likely, and more u.s. less secure. now i would like to conclude and i'm looking for to questions from everyone, and a discussion. the major motivation of this book is to begin a discussion and debate about these faces that have been on question for so long. i'm looking forward to that debate tonight. i want to conclude with a story of russell madden. he was a soldier soldier in germany that died in afghanistan in 2012 and 2010. russell grew up in bellevue, contact gi a

sanctions which iran subjects would be subject to view by the other parties, including inran, -- iran, china, and russia. they have an immediate right to challenge in an international venue, this will be dealt with the support of parties that do not like or want to see u.s. financial power and influence. it may even drive a wedge between the u.s. and europe moving forward. numbernimum, this will our use of financial tools against iran. the spirit and letter of the agreement may neuter u.s. agreement -- power in the future. from the start, what the iranians wanted most was the ability to do business again, unfettered and unplugged, back into the global system. to regime is needed access banking, shipping, insurance, and new technologies. that is what they lost over the past decade, that appears to be what they have gained in this deal. the u.s. really to amplify its use of financial measures aggressively against key measures of the iranian economy to deal with increased risks. it is not at all clear that this is well understood by all parties, or even part of our strategy. we have the ability to do so, u

iran will not only have billions of dollars to go on a shopping spree in the international arms market but it is also sure to find plenty of states eager to sell those weapons especially russia and china. in this way the iran agreement not only paves iran's path to a nuclear capability, it will further iran's emergence as a dominant military power in the middle east. this has i direct and dangerous implications for u.s. armed forces. the ultimate guarantee that iran will not give a nuclear weapon is not a 109 page document, it is the capability of the u.s. military to do what is necessary if all else fails. and yet, this agreement would enable iran to construct a kind of advanced military arsenal that could make our military option. instead of enhancing our deterrence-- is this agreement fails, the u.s. service members called upon to take direction against the rim, their lives could be at greater risk because of this agreement. that is perhaps the most troubling aspect of all of this agreement. what is means for america's credibility in the middle east. since 1979, republican and democratic administrations thought to contain the islamic republic of iran and prevent it from acquiring n

see what is happening threatshe world that are rising against america, not just from iran but from china and russia and even from central and south america. this president has turned a blind eye to deliberately powerful enemies. notas empowered russia by holding up to her trees with ukraine. he has empowered syria. he has empowered iran. he has empowered isis. he has empowered china. our enemieskind to and very harsh to our allies. we need a leader who will stand for the principles of our government and for our own national security. we need one who will stand with our allies to make sure that our interests are defended. race has thes record that i do on national security. just about three months ago, and itblished a magazine comes out on a monthly basis, i am told. so for three months, my picture was in their magazine. and it was under the headline, "in the words of our enemy." i laid out who our enemies are and i have put it out very clearly as i have in speeches why and how isis can be defeated. i was put on an isis enemy list. nobody else in this race is on unfortunately, neither is hillary cli

by the way which means that, you know, china, russia and iran cannot veto. but a majority of states. and that could be the u.s., britain, france, germany, are able to immediately say that this is being violated and put those sanctions back makes me feel relatively secure that if the iranians don't live up to their agreement that we will have the security to go at least back to the status quo. which isn't very good today, by the way, but at least status quo. >> okay. we'll take one more question. do you have one? okay. >> very exciting internship. it sounds like you've implemented a lot of great initiatives in los angeles. and you've been doing a great job. but what are your comments on the recent spike in crime there? and also kind of saddleback on that, how do you view obama's recent 46 pardons onto nonviolent federal drug offenders and how can that fit into your city? >> first of all, i think it's great again a bipartisan coalition is taking up criminal justice reform. we spend way too much in very criminal way. i want to keep the bad guys and girls locked

not understanding if we step behind it is of the global community that steps forward but russia or china or iranaos. lou: be sure to vote. a federal judge is now deciding the fate after last-minute settlement talks between the patriots quarterback tom brady in the players' association failed. attorneys tried to reach a deal this morning but they did not succeed as a result if federal judge says he will rule if the brady must serve a four game suspension as decreed by the commissioner and could decide as early as tomorrow. we will be joined by nfl hall of fame linebacker one of the giants of the giants. beach closures is in california they spotted to hammerhead sharks this weekend one was a foot long swimming by a kayaker as the lifeguards described in nonaggressive manner but they were on the beach. and in central california acer for nearly escaped an attack. the great white got a huge chunk of her board. she was not hurt. what a souvenir. a crisis testing leadership in europe. leading touche jockeying demonstrations black lives matter. all lives matter. we will take that up with two of our expe

the country faces a number of challenges overseas, including deal ing with isis russia china, iran. up next we'll show you how the gop candidates plan to tackle these issues if they are elected the next commander in chief. that's straight ahead. are you still getting heartburn flare-ups? time for a new routine. try nexium® 24hr. the latest choice for frequent heartburn. get complete protection. nexium level protection. i'm not sick. i'm not sick. i'm not sick. she's perfectly healthy. cigna covers preventive care. that's having your back. can a business have a mind? a subconscious. a knack for predicting the future. reflexes faster than the speed of thought. can a business have a spirit? can a business have a soul? can a business be...alive? morning ted! scott! ready to hit some balls? ooh! hey buddy, what's up? this is what it can be like to have shingles. oh, man. a painful, blistering rash. if you had chickenpox, the shingles virus is already inside you. 1 in 3 people will get shingles in their lifetime. ah. after almost 3 weeks i just really wanted to give it a shot. you know, i

the country faces a number of challenges overseas, including deal ing with isis, russia, china, iran.next we'll show you how the gop candidates plan to tackle these issues if they are elected the next commander in chief. that's straight ahead. before i burning, pins-and-needles of diabetic nerve pain, these feet grew up in a family of boys... married my high school sweetheart... and pursued a degree in education. but i couldn't bear my diabetic nerve pain any longer. so i talked to my doctor and she prescribed lyrica. nerve damage from diabetes causes diabetic nerve pain. lyrica is fda-approved to treat this pain. lyrica may cause serious allergic reactions or suicidal thoughts or actions. tell your doctor right away if you have these, new, or worsening depression, or unusual changes in mood or behavior. or swelling, trouble breathing, rash, hives, blisters, muscle pain with fever, tired feeling, or blurry vision. common side effects are dizziness, sleepiness, weight gain and swelling of hands, legs and feet. don't drink alcohol while taking lyrica. don't drive or use machinery until

and iran on our side of the agreement. it's russia, china, brittain, france, germany. agreement is rejected by the congress, the sanctions will erode. russia and china have said they won't go along. it's unlikely that the others will and so iran will then be in a position of having done nothing and getting relief from sanctions. if, on the other hand, the agreement is approved and supported, iran will have to take verifiable steps verified by the international atomic agency that will prevent it from attaining a nuclear weapon through either the enrichment of uranium or the manufacture of plutonium. it's an effective agreement. it has broad support. not just the countries involved in the agreement. all 15 members of the united nations security council support it. the overwhelming majority of countries around the world that have declared a position support the agreement. rejection by the congress would be a huge set back and would be more likely to trigger a nuclear iran and a nuclear arms race in the region thereby undermining the nuclear nonproliferation regime which t

that weakness is now increasing the dangers to the people of the united states from russia, china, iran the deterioration of the middle east, from al qaeda, from isis. these things are blossoming up because of the weak uncertain foreign policy this president has been leading us on. i think the obama-clinton foreign policy is inherently dangerous. it will require strong leadership, rebuilding of our military and a sense around the world that we're going to lead. >> governor gilmore, one more quick question on iran. if you took office and on your first day in an intelligence briefing you were told from all of the best intelligence sources that, in fact, the iran deal is working. we have no evidence the iranians are cheating and the intelligence community believes they are complying with the iran deal, would you change your mind and simply, continue to enforce that deal rather than just rip it up? >> as you know, lawrence, i'm a former army intelligence agent, united states army veteran stationed in europe during the cold war. i have a lot of respect for the intelligence community and the

has to have that snapback piecet of it that allows a majority, w and by the way means that china, russia and iran cannot veto, buy a majority of states and that could be u.s., britain, france, german, are able to say this is being violated and put those ms sanctions back makes me feel o safe if the iranians don't livet up to the agreement we can have. the security to go back to the status quo, which isn't very good today but at least the status quo. >> okay. we'll take one more question. do you guys have one? >> yeah.e >> this is chris. >> very exciting. >> for major papers. ou' >> it sounds like you've implemented a lot of great initiatives in los angeles and job. aregreat b. but what are your comments on the recent spike in crime thered and also kind of to saddleback on that, how do you view obama's 46 pardons on to nonviolent edel federal drug offenders and how can that fit into your city. ll >> first of all, i think it is great that a bipartisan ion is coalition is taking up criminal justice reform.. we spend way too much on ch i criminal justice matters. i want to keep the bad guys and gals

sanction or related action to which iran objects would be subject to review by the other parties including iran, china and russiawe've converted the iranian sanctions program into one in which the target has an immediate right to challenge and international venue in which to do it. this will be done with the support of parties that do not luke or want to see the use of u.s. financial power or influence. it may even drive a wedge between the u.s. and europe moving forward. and at a minimum all this will temper or aggressive use of financial tools against iran. mr. chaurm the spirit and letter of the agreement may neuter u.s. abill utity to leverage our power. what the iranians wanted most was the ability to do business again, unfettered and unplugged back into the global system. they've needed shipping new technology and connective ut to global markets. that's what they lost over the past decade. that appears to be what they have gained and guaranteed in this deal. the u.s. will need to amplify its use of financial measures aggressively against key elements of the economy to deal with increased risk. it's not at

the threats from russia from iran from china, from the dissolution of the middle east. from isis.at have to be faced, and i think i am entitled to offer my credentials, experience and the ideas i have for this country but probably won't be in the first group that they want to try to limit the debate to. >> rupert murdoch weighed in this morning on twitter and said thursday's debate is -- fox's thursday debate is vital for all candidates. >> they have begun to reach out to me and i'm pretty happy about that. i'm not going to second-guess what they want to do. it's up to them to issue the appropriate invitations. i'm i'm saddened that the people of the united states will not get to see some of the additional ideas that i can offer because i'm focused on what's wrong with the country. >> they say viewers will be able to see it but at 5:00 p.m. instead of 9:00. cnn is doing something similar in september. they'll both be on in prime time but there will still be a division. >> maybe there will be an opportunity with cnn to address the decline of this country and what we need to do to r

the country faces a number of challenges overseas, including deal ing with isis, russia, china, iran. up next we'll show you how the gop candidates plan to tackle these issues if they are elected the next commander in chief. that's straight ahead. commander in chief. that's straight ahead. get fast-acting, long-lasting relief from heartburn with it neutralizes stomach acid and is the only product that forms a protective barrier that helps keep stomach acid in the stomach where it belongs. for fast-acting, long-lasting relief. try gaviscon®. teaching science can get pretty messy. drop! watch this... so i switched to tide pods they're super concentrated so i get a better clean. 15% cleaning ingredients or 90%. don't pay for water, pay for clean. that's my tide. prep trauma unit 5. what've we got? bp 64/40 sterilize sites. multiple foreign objects in the body. tweezers. (buzz!) (buzz!) if you're the guy from the operation game, you get operated on. it's what you do. (buzz!) if you want to save fifteen percent or more on car insurance you switch to geico. it's what you do. with the pain a

retreat during the six years of the obama administration has now come the advance of other powers russia china, iran. you can't make the argument that the strategic failures you describe in the book is the result of withdrawal of american troops from those countries and those regions. how do you attribute this? there is a pattern here to the way in which these aggressor nations are taking full opportunity but how is it related directly to the way in which the obama administration policy in other areas have rebounded to creating new strategic threats in other parts of the world? >> guest: cutting the defense budget which was driven to a large extent by what is going on in the middle east has had a global impact i think our enemies have been encouraged by that and more importantly our friends have become more concerned, they doubt our credibility but added to that, they look at decisions the united states has made, the syrian red line we backed away from. the administration has consistently been reluctant to stand up for things, the ukraine is particularly disturbing example where we agreed to protect

the administration assumed that even if russia and china were to take iran's side, washington could always count on the votes of germany, france, and britain as well as the eu representative. this 5-3 vote majority assumes that one european vote will not change in the face of intimidation. while the u.s. can move to impose u.n. security council sanctions over the objection of china and russia, would it do so without european support? europe will also have a strong economic incentive not to join the u.s. in snapping back sanctions as companies invest billions into the iranian market pressure will grow. the same dynamics apply to nonnuclear sanctions including terrorism. on july 20, iran released a statement to the u.n. security council that i mate reconsider its commitments under the agreement if new sanctions are imposed irrespective of whether such new sanctions are introduced on nuclear related and other grounds. iran may be able to use this threat to prevent washington from combating iran's support for terrorism or human rights abuses. in the face of threats, for example, would europe a

there is an unexpected change, i will support the nuclear agreement between iran and the p5 plus one which is uk, france, russia, china and germany because i am convinced it .-full-stop iran from developing a nuclear weapon for at least the next ten to 15 years. no other available alternatives accomplishes this vital objective. the goal of this negotiation: david in this deal the goal was to deny iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon. this objective has been fulfilled in the short term. for the next ten years iran will reduce its centrifuges and machines that enrich the uranium by two thirds. they will go for more than 19,000 centrifuges to 6,000. only 5,000 of those will be operated with all of the most basic models. the deeply buried facility will be converted to the research lab no enrichment can occur. it is enough for ten bombs will be reduced by 90% to only 300 kilograms. research and development into the advanced centrifuges will also be limited and taken together these constraints will lengthen the time that it will take for iran to produce a highly enriched uranium for the so-called breakout time will reduce i