and go, that's great, you know, i can understand if you looked in the mirror and went this or that, irto change this. if you looked in and went, looking good, buddy, what's wrong with that? >> i think it's great to have self-esteem and a healthy body image but at the same time we need to keep appearance in perspective. >> stephen: the craziest thing is is you got married during this year without mirrors. >> i did. stephen: what was that like? [ cheers and applause ] that's daredevil. >> the wedding and preparing for the wedding was the reason i had to do this project. i was really getting sucked into the industry, the wedding industry telling me that, you know,... >> stephen: your most beautiful day of your life. >> most important day of my life and that the wedding was really about what i looked like and not about my marriage and all my friends and family. and i was feeling alarmed. my research at u.c.l.a. is about body image and women's issues. i felt kind of like a body image expert with a body image problem and i wanted to change that. >> stephen: did you think you had a problem? as

and it's much 45rd irto eliminate one tax expenditure nan to force somebody to add it back in.be raised. let's take the mortgage reduction. i think that's a fair one people talk about all the time. my best guess is you can end up going from a reduction to maybe credit. if you look at the tax code only 73% almost three-quarters of the american people don't use the mortgage interest deduction or the charitable deduction. forever more, there is a study out by the i think the tax policy center. it came out that says that if you were so some way limit the mortgage deduction interest, that it might have some marginal effect on home prices, but if you were to change it to a credit from a deduction, then you'd have a chance to increase prices of homes. i think there are lots of ways we can do this smarter, quicker, better, if we are smart about it. >> everybody that he wants the housing industry, when we bring up this idea basically says it will be the end of the housing industry if you were to change the rules right now. obviously, the fed has been watching the housing industry closel

and it is if a irto students because the government won't be making any money. it won't b be reducing the defit on the back of the students. fair to taxpayers, fair to students. doesn't cost the taxpayers, doesn't balance the budget on the back of students. on that basis, we can say to students take advantage of these low rates. get a ten-year loan if you're an undergraduate at 3.66%. there is no need to pretend we're helping students when we only fix 40% of the students -- these are the subsidized loans. these are the loans for low-income students who already get for the most part pell grants, who already have their interest paid while they're in school. that's a big subsidy, over about $50 billion in ten years. and we leave the middle-income students, about six million of them, paying over the next ten years hundreds of millions of dollars they shouldn't be paying. i don't know why my friends on the other side want to leave the middle-income students of america twisting in the wind paying higher interest rates than they should. let's step back, look at the fac