. >> one thing we're looking at is multirole, shorter procurement timelines. when i was chief of the staff of the army, i get briefed on programs where the requirements were established until 2013. and we're not going to deliver until 2014. making it a certainty that we're going to deliver something either late or doesn't spiral in new technology. as you spiral in texas, the requirement zbos up much closer merger of requirements and material solutions, with senior leader involvement and shorter horizons. we haven't gotten industry on board with that and we haven't gotten the congress of the united states on board with that. but that is the answer. >> mr. young? >> i want to comment the secretary and under secretary on the audit ready initiative. i'm happy to serve on the audit readiness panel in the extent -- lend a critical eye as your efforts play out, but we want to help however we can. very important. i'm concerned that some of these proposed cuts to our defense budget may not be strategy based. and i'm open, i'm open to all manner of cuts, identifying eff