walker: personally, and i believe the position that r.s.c. is against earmarks. the reason why, historically, we've seen where there's not only corruption but abuse when it comes to it. i know the other side of the argument, the army corps of engineers who gets to choose a lot where this money now goes, different projects, doesn't always get to the red states so i can understand the frustration. i believe if we'll continue to try to say, hey, here's what we're trying to accomplish with congress, here's the honesty, here's the transparency, i believe that this is not the time for earmarks to return, to be able to have the members being able to specifically designate where those funds go. >> and you can see that discussion in its entirety on our website c-span.org. go live now to the u.s. house. members will be debating legislation setting up a diabetes care commission among other legislation. live now to the house. the speaker pro tempore: the house will be in order. the prayer will be offered by our chaplain, father conroy. chaplain conroy: let us pray. loving god