and that is what she is -- that is what he is speaking to. and if you are asking for more than is required by law, you start to limit the rights of people. i do not know whether this is. that may be the discussion next week. i would like for to be clear that the substance of concern is not any thing that we are going to be able to address next week. this is a procedure about what we can do, the risks and the limits, and perhaps we could clarify this. >> this seems to not be the will of the commission to have the item on the agenda next week. we could have this in the form of a memo, to clarify what they believe is a reasonable scope for the following work. and then, if you want you to have a discussion at a later date. we kelly's to clarity about the scope of this. >> we agree with what the director has said, and given the most minimal additional alternatives that you need to analyze, we're looking at a day in january. >> there is the hearing with members of the commission -- as to exactly what is needed, and this was a lot more narrow. i sup

the money is there. it is going to the union. it is not going to infrastructure but going to unions. that is what the first guest pointed out. most of us who read in the wall street journal, thought you could not trade with nonpublic information but aides, barn aides, democrats and republicans, who have information on companies and are trading on the information. what is going on? >>guest: there were dozens of congressional staffers who have and i agree with you, i would classify this as insider information about projects that are going to be funded by congress, and infrastructure projects, or renewable energy projects, or earmarks, and they are trading ahead of that, becoming public information. that is classic insider trading. >> why is it not illegal? an aide to the speaker of the house, but this is bipartisan, an aide to republican senator crapo and an aide to republican member of the house, and aide to harry reid but it is both sides. you thing of us, steve, as journalists, we could have information that is not public before

that is kind of the way it is going. i don't know how they are going to evaluate, that teaches special ed or in a middle-class neighborhood or an area with a lot of the second class letters. i don't know how they will implement that. it seems to be unworkable. host: before we let you go and go to class, in the manifesto, here is what they wrote -- a "for too long, we have let teacher hiring and retention be governed by archaic rules. there is not a business in america that would survive if it cannot make personnel decisions based on performance." caller: well, i agree that we need to look at our evaluation system. but in my experience, i see a lot of a very hardworking, capable teachers, and i think that is -- firing teachers is not going to get us where we want to be. host: lauren, st. paul, -- lorne, st. paul, minnesota, parents line. caller: there are terrible problems and i will take the second one first. -- two problems and i will take the second one for a spre -- first. we have legislated schools to teach more than

what is the point of cyber bullying? it is a power game? >> yes, it is, it is supporting.gay, however, if the children and teen them to be gay, lesbian and they're often teased about that to the point of bullying. and they are getting out did, there will post this online, jokes, and countless anti-gay slurs at these children. that is what is happening. >> what age? >> and probably 10 years old-18 years old. and even earlier. >> wow and now, what you doing about this? coming have you seen? >> i've seen several cases, when the first began with the crisis center i began a task force. there was such a us huge rise ie cyber bowling coming up with several of oz that go out and suburbs-bullying. in class presentations, that focus on cyber bullying and kids often identify and initially with those on television. the larger kids with leather jackets and when we talk about it is that we recognize that younger people are saying that it actually be any one of us in this room. or the victim. >> yes. >> exactly. >> and according to this, that you've worked with 10,000 young people betwee

this is an example of how extreme he is. this is the mindset of joe. he is in step with nancy pelosi. it is only criticism is that she did not go far enough. we cannot spend our way to prosperity. in instead of is growing government, let's have an across-the-board cut in payroll taxes. we could have cut payroll taxes roughly in half for about three years. every single worker would have a take-home pay raise. >> us to get the stimulus bill. economists said another 8 million economists would have lost their job. unemployment would have been over 11%. 1/3 of the stimulus wanted tax cuts for the middle-class 1/3 one two unemployment. congressman toomey voted against it. 1/3 was for a job creation. he is right. i did want to do something else. i wanted to work with republicans. this is a good word. if we have given that tax credit for every new job that was created, we would have 5 million jobs created today. it is a matter of looking at it pragmatically. the stimulus help? yes, it did. it was something where we had been torpedoed. the ship was sinking. we

it is just silliness, that is what this really is. host: let me ask you, though, about what influence, if any, do you think advised to spend so much money? what do you think the impact is? caller: i think earlier on an article in talks about the fact that if you got a relative unknown, that is when it really helps to get that person out there. and that is really about all it can do. i know who my congressmen is and i know how he voted and that is why i voted against him. i already knew who i was going to vote for and who i was going to vote against. host: who did you vote for? caller: jim cooper is our socialist in chief congressman. and i voted for dave paul, his republican opponent but i already knew who both of the more. i did not need advertising to figure it out. host: do you think you are the exception? caller: i certainly hope not. host: a little bit more from david brooks this morning. he writes this -- indianapolis on the independent line. your turn. what do you think? caller: i think is great. the more money, the better. in

their argument is that is a statute, it is a lot. we heard that there is a nation of laws? the president has a way he wants to do this. he does not want this to affect the midterm elections. he said, let's do a study. let's make sure that people are ok with this. let's wait until december. i think everybody sees what is going on here. i do not know why the president says we have to wait. he has been in office for a long time. he could have instituted a nondiscrimination policy. if he repeals happens his white -- right now i think the president has two choices. he can continue to do what he is doing and appeal the decision, essentially bringing back "don't ask, don't tell" from the dead, or he can realize the courts have done the heavy work for him. the courts are supposed to do that. i don't understand the disconnect here. there are a lot disconnect between the president and the system of government that he purports to represent in the executive branch. there is a disconnect between the president and the american people. host: we want to get to telephone calls. we have a fo

i think that is what is important. appreciate all the work that congressman toby has done over the years, but the fact is that the earmarks process is something that we really need to change. we really need to crack down on federal spending. >> mr. duffy? >> my concern with earmarks is that it is slip in under the cover of darkness. i want to bring transparency to this process. what i would like to see happen is that any project that we think is worth federal dollars, let's bring it to the house floor and let everyone see it and have a great conversation on what american spending is appropriate. just because i am not in favor of earmarks does not mean that i am not in favor of money being spent in the seventh district. not all government spending is bad. if it is good spending, i will advocate for those projects and make sure wisconsin projects get funded. if you look at a lot of our businesses, a lot of them get work for the federal government. i will advocate for our hard- working businesses in wisconsin because i th

it is the most painful kind of case, but it is obvious that speech that is decent acceptable is not stuff that you want to or have to protect, because there is no reason to. it is like the burning of rththe koran or the nazi march in skokie, all kinds of stuff that we don't want to see, but you have to allow, because once you draw the line, you have real trouble. you have political control of political speech. >> i stand in awe of albert snyder, the father of that dead marine, that he could express the forcefully get with restraint something that must absolutely be tearing him apart. but i do agree with charles' conclusion. >> colby, at a certain level you know how you really want to handle this. >> it is despicable and i would like to punch them out. i come down on the side of the first amendment, have had many experiences with this over the years, family funerals. given some of the behavior i have seen at family funerals, i would take those people -- at wakes, funerals, the post-fee nor gatherings -- post-funeral gatherings, people tend to act out. you have got to kind of just allow for

that is extreme, that as radical, and that is wrong. and i could not be honest with myself to stay in the party. i happen to be running as an independent. my only allegiance is to you, not party bosses in washington when i get there. only to the people of florida if you're kind enough to send me there. i think that is the kind of leadership that people want. >> mr. rubio, you have called for the extension of the bush tax cuts for those earning more than to under $50,000 in family income. even though eliminating that tax break for higher income braked would increase our deficit. if that case why are you willing to borrow hundreds of billions of dollars to provide these tax cuts to the wealthiest 3% of americans guard to get let's be clear about a couple of things that you said. the bush tax cuts of the current tax code. what i had done and what a growing number of democrats have said is that it is a bad idea to raise of tax on anyone at this time, especially in an economic downturn but that is not just me saying that. gov. canada and the

there is is 62 in bodega bay. up to 83 degrees. there is 78 in oakland and union city. inland areas 82 in livermore and antioch coming up to 84 degrees around the bay. there is beach weather in santa cruz 78. taking a look at the accu-weather forecast there is a mild to warm forecast for fleet week. and there is mid-80s inlnld. and at least through monday, then, you can see 70s showing up and this is close to 90 degrees inland there. is a slow cooling trend later on next week. >> thank you. >> and coming up next, a woman changing her mind about the bathtub she bought. >> 7 on your side stop herz from taking a bath on the deal. meg whitman's nose is growing again. this time she's lying about jerry brown on taxes. but as governor jerry brown cut $4 billion in taxes and says no new taxes without voter approval. meg whitman -- her nose just keeps on growing and growing. meg whitman is lying about jerry brown again...on taxes again. newspapers have called many of her ads untrue. fact: jerry brown cut taxes by $4 billion and says no new taxes without voter approval. but meg w

this is a fight. this is a real battle. people are getting stomped out on the campaign trail. >> i would hardly call a 37% job approval in his first term succeeding. the other part of his problem is that when he comes out with language like this, it is holy unpresidential. he is supposed to be the president of all of the people, including those who oppose him and his agenda. the other part of his problem is it violates the obama brand. the obama brand was bringing everybody together and healing what divides us. he has gone out there and been the most devicive. >> exit question. >> instead of hitting the campaign trail, president obama stayed in the white house with the democrats then have been in multiple choice, a, would they be better off. b, would they be worse off? c, would they be about the same? >> they would be better off. but no. i think basically he helped some democrats. >> give me an answer. >> overall, it's a wash. >> which district? >> liberal districts he helps, no doubt about it. but he hurts -- >> in the uns

this is to do with what happens when the hearing is over. under the current procedures, the hearing officer, who is paid 300 or $400 an hour, is given time to write a lengthy report including telling us what he or she thinks should happen in the case. we have to read the transcript any way to come to our independent judgment, so i think we do not need someone else to tell us since we are going to read the transcript as well. this shortens the report to 10 pages maximum to be delivered within 10 days and focuses solely upon that hearing officer's observations to the hearing on demeanor and credibility. that is something we cannot see and it would be helpful for us to hear something that came up with the live eyes of the hearing officer. that is the fourth change. the fifth is at the very end, on the very last part of the current rules. this came up a couple of weeks ago. even if we sustain a finding after all these delays, we have to put it up for a further penalty hearing, further delays. i am proposing that we allow the commission the autho

the matter is submitted. >> this is difficult and this is horrible. when we get a lot of these cases, the decision we make is going to affect some one substantially, financially. in order to get a medallion, there are two requirements. you keep track of your bills. so that they can determine whether or not the full time driving requirements were met. i would hate to think what if there was no fabrication, the situation where the spirit have was really the fault of luxor as much as it was of this individual. all of those things can affect you emotionally and intellectually. the fact remains that in order to get a medallion, you have to have proven they you have driven a certain number of hours. you have to keep records. i am entirely sympathetic to this individual, but i see no way that my fellow commissioners can decide if the records were not kept sufficiently. >> i think that is part of the case here, however, there are two items that this is predicated upon. one is the correlation between the spare and the medallion, the primary car itself. we need

all we can do is react to what the majority is doing. it is more than just reacting.here are issues that the american people are concerned about. i think my job and our job in the minority is to have solutions to those problems will that americans have bought solutions that are built and our principles as republicans very host: your reactions to the comments by john behner? guest: he will have more to worry about than the schedule if he becomes speaker. i think the schedule will fall into the hands eric kantor it becomes majority leader. what john behner will have to do is get everybody to work together and that will be really hard. he, as the leader, has been different from speakers in the past because he has been less of a top-down leader when he was majority leader and when he was a minority leader. host: and he was a committee chair. guest: yes, he tends to let the rank and file battle amongst themselves and he is less of a top-down kind of executive, i guess. that strategy in combination with the kind of republican conference that he will the government will be d

that is all that is left just about. the remaining issue with flooding and whatnot will start to straighten itself out today. by the end of the day we fully intend to get some sunshine in the picture and turn this around. here is the amount of rain we got yesterday. on tv hill almost five inches of rain. east of us, six, seven, eight inches of rain. you see the band of red up and down the bay into harford county and into pennsylvania. that is where the heaviest rain was yesterday and that was up six, seven, eight-inches. farther west the lesser amounts of rain. but three to four inches at a minimum. most of the thunderstorm activity has moved east and is in new jersey. as far as the flood threat, we have a flood warning around our area. advisories elsewhere. so we are dealing with the left overs from the storm. the windiest conditions will be the atlantic coastline although we will be breezy here. we look at the surface map and we see this storm system beginning to pull out of the picture and move to the east clearing, s

maybe it is too complicated for people. but is hurting a taboo category. that is senior citizens. the fed's strategy right now has senior citizens on fixed income and they're making nothing on its bread -- on it. nobody is ringing the alarm bell. >> i thought you were going one way and you went another way. the anti-fed thing has quieted down a little bit. when you look back on employment, -- when you look at unemployment, you can see how people come to that conclusion. i cannot answer the question why there is not much of -- mach more of a rebellion. the bar words have been -- the borrowers have been enjoying refinancing. it is a good point. it really shows up. i do not have a good dancer. -- i do not have a good answer. >> i will risk a little generational war. as a group, i am not surprised that they're not angry. they did not have much to be angry about. they got to really benefit from this huge run-up in the american real-estate and stock market. it is something that the younger generations will not get the benefit from. i do not know if that explains the lack of outrage at t

that is what this is about.he does not want to talk about things such as the stimulus for the bailout she voted for for the banks and others. she was trying to change the subject. that is what you're seeing going on a inad ag -- going on in ad after ad. the newspapers have been saying her ads are false, do not pass the smell test. this is a problem. we have come a long way from the good intentions that senator murray had when she started as a senator 18 years ago. senator murray >> -- >> senator murray? >> i appreciate the endorsements of those newspapers that mr. rossi site. i'm proud of the work i do for washington state, for veterans, making sure our local communities have the strongest advocate ever to fight for them and make sure they have what they need in this economy, making sure that we do protect everyone here, and that they feel strong again. that is what i do. i think the fact that the if you have to say who you are and who paid for the at. i do on my aunt. i don't understand why mr. rossi does not w

to make that change, it is, in fact, it is needed. first question, based on the discussion so far, i believe you are putting the cart before the horse. if the victim industry is so profitable and civilians, our clients, how do we as the attorney, change our image? shouldn't we be trying to change the public's perception of the system as a whole? >> i was trying to address that. dalton spoke to it as well. fih+-- jonathan spoke to it as. we have to make the á discussioa broader discussion, so that people understand how it affects their daily lives, how it affects the way government works. is there going to be money, our state parks going to be open, money for education? what does this say about the state of california, where i believe the largest union is not the teachers' association, but the correctional officers association? what does that say about a society? when people find out about that, they are stunned. but that is the reality. that is what is playing on people's minds, fear, prejudice, ignorance. >> this also points to the

on the other hand t is interesting admission because what he is saying is that he had neglected basically to bring the public along with him. >> rose: that is the explanation. >> that is an important part-- sorry. >> rose: that is the explanation part. he didn't bring the public along with him meaning he didn't explain it very well reasons right, exactly. now of course, that's also, an easy refuge for a politician it is a communications problem, not a policy problem. if only they understood what i was trying to do, everybody would agree with me. that may or may not be the case. it may be the public does understand what he is doing and is simply not buying it at this point. we are being to learn a little more about that in a few weeks. but clearly he thinks it is a mix of these things. he is not putting it all on that one element. >> rose: politics seems to have always been there, even in discussions of war. >> sure. right. let's's face it, that's been true of any white house, obviously. and it's hard to imagine that politics ent err into most major decisions. now the question is are the p

is much lower. >> right, but this extensive list here is evidence that training is occurring. supervisor campos: it defense on how you see it, right? if training is occurring for 15%, as they said, yes, training is occurring for 15%, but that also means it is not for 85%. on the issue of case management, i think that is another issue i would like to hear more about because at least the report talked about only 11 case managers for the population of 1134. again, i think it would be helpful to get the numbers from you can get a better sense of what the case load of these case managers actually is and what happens where there is no case manager available, and maybe just provide some clarity on that. i think that would be helpful. >> and if you want that today? supervisor campos: this is just about getting that information in the near future. and the same issue on transportation. if you could also address the issues raised. supervisor mar: and on the training, the information on the impact of the lawsuit settlement would be very helpful. i'm just noticing from the quarterly report

what is on the agenda here is a karaoke machine. that is all. it is not even on the same floor as the alleged expansion of our activities upstairs. they are trying to work with -- they never hit it. that is probably why nobody paid any attention to it. this karaoke machine has been seized upon by lot of people who also have -- is due restaurant bar of illegal on the second floor? it is not illegal. it is within the confines of what is allowed. i understand people are upset, but it is simply a karaoke machine. for a different sort of used than what everyone is complaining about. one speaker mentioned the internet and the comments better included in the appeal brief. it basically puts in reviews that talk about a sports bar and watching games up there. if you look at each of the reviews, out of 75 pages, more than half of those talk about the food. it is served in the bar area on the second floor on a regular basis. it shows tables and chairs with machines on them. this is a restaurant that is deemed to have expanded a little too far. we are willi

why is a great painting is that is 300 years old still great? >> and that really hits at that the music is timeless. also, some photographs of jimi hendrix at the monterey pop festival. that is really when he came to the forefront. certainly in the bay area. >> and certainly, he had to go to europe first. for some reason he was not catching on. he became a huge sensation and the european musicians, market. he came back here, add it changed everything at the monterey pop festival stage. it was the jaw dropping. can we expect for this exhibit question mark from the early days, of the olympia. all the way to his work at the culver call, with stock. that was is less, iconic. >> woodstock-- >> it is a great show. and it is great to be part of it. >> and when you are taking these photos did you realize it was something so special? >> difficult question. >> and i realized that he was extraordinary. and when you saw him live he was so charismatic. and with he looked. it was sensational. and i knew that it was special what i had no idea that 43 years lat

that is not what it is about. tavis: good music in a marriage always helps. >> in fact one of the songs are road on my wedding day was "wedding day," which we performed at the victoria's secret show. she is not a singer. she will tell you she is not a singer, but she sings around the house. we performed it live on stage and it was something that i will always remember. tavis:, last year, for the album of covers you worked with david foster on that. i noticed on this project you are back with david foster again. i am not naive in asking is, but why did foster again? >> i think david is the last of a disappearing breed. i mean that with the greatest respect. he is a truly great, great producer. and i do not use that term easily. or lightly. he has all the skill sos of a true producer, in the same way that quincy jones does. i think him and quincy are possibly the last two i can think of that i would use that term great in terms of what a producer is supposed to be. he has all of those arraigned and qualities, a grea

he is 19 and she is 16 or she is 19 and he is 16. that is the most of the mark. let's face it -- we should know, especially in san francisco, that as human beings, we are not really comfortable with sex. some of us do not even know who we are, right? from day to day, right? you know, i mean, sex is a very complicated issue. the idea that sexual behavior and people's aberrations with it or problems with it or confusions should send them to present for life sentences. in wisconsin, they have the same thing in iowa and illinois -- actually have built prisons just for sex offenders. can you imagine? the entire prison are sex offenders, mostly young men. that is what they are. young men who are confused about their sexuality. as my son was or your son was. i'm going to continue with this, just some of the suggestions we have had. get rid of the word "officer." you have police officers -- isn't that enough? we have, like, 2 million of them. it should be social workers, correctional workers. parole workers. get rid of parole officers and probation officers all together.

>> this is the top floor setback? >> that is correct. >> where is the rear of the project? >> that is right here. i believe that is the building wall. >> i was going to ask why you would not have them pulled this all the way back to match the appellant set back but it looks like it be in the garden? >> this would have an adverse impact on the rear yard. >> that is not a requirement. the project sponsor agreed to do this. >> that is often a good idea. >> that is not required. they don't see any need to have a shadow steady. >> is there a need for this study? >> i was interested to see that this would not be needed because of the size and location of the edition and the location of the appellants property. i don't see how there would be much of an impact on the property. going further and doing a steady does not seem necessary. >> what about these from the park? >> i don't see how this is negatively impacting any views of the public open space. this is a very modest addition. >> thank you. i have won public comment card here. >> this project is in deeper tora neighborhood. i

but in the meantime, this is what is going on. the taliban who are willing to give up their arms and join in government and such, i am skeptical that can take place, but i wildefer for theoment, at least, to general patraeus. i believe he will make the correct assessment on the ground and he will tell us next july whether this has a chance of succeeding. and if it does not, then president obama has a different decision to make at that time. host: kansas, republican caller, welcome. caller: good morning. i was fortunate enough to work for a company that was on the leading edge of the new economic order. i worked for fedex and it's fundamentally changed the way logistics' was handled. one of the things i saw as i traveled internationally is that the world is much more willing to compete that i think a lot of americans are. and there are a couple of problems i would like you to talk about, at least as i see them. one is, i live in a small town in kansas, and one thing i hear over and over again is that we need more of low-wage manufa

there is sun. there is flavor on my tongue. there is singing there is sun. there is a snake on the path singing in the sun. there is song, there is sun. on the path there is a squirrel in the daisies there is blank in the trash there is a song, there is sun. on the snake there is a squirrel on the blank there are daisies in the trash, there is a snake in the stream singing, there is sun. there is sun. there is a path in the trash, there is hair in the feathers, singing, there is song, there is song, there are birds there is hair in my mouth there is a snake on the path sunning, there is sun, there is sun, there is hair, in my mouth there is singing on the path there is a snake in the trash singing, there is song, there is sun. there are feathers in her hair. there is flavor in the stream, there is a snake on my tongue in the sun, sunning. there is sun. there is sun, there is sing on the sun. there are birds on the grass, there are squirrels in the trash, there are trees with feathers singing. there is sun. there is a snake on the pass sunning. there is sun.

every state is different. every community is different. states are in a much better position to decide what is best for children. cox our next question was submitted by john thompson, a utility worker who lives in hartsdale. he would like to know, what are the facts, negative or positive, of the obama health care plant and how will hoosiers' be affected? how would you change the plan and why? >> as you know, i voted for the health care plan that came before us. it was important -- when i first started to run for congress, my first meetings were constituents that if you get elected, please do something about the rising cost of healthcare in this country. i am proud that we took it on. i think that it does some great things. it eliminates pre-existing conditions for children and eventually, adults. it closes the doughnut hole for seniors so that when they get to a certain point of using medication, they do not have to go into bankruptcy or stop taking medicine. eliminates the cap so that if you get sick and -- you do not spend your whole ent

here it is. we, as one nation, must stand together, must fight the forces of evil, the conservatives in this country, across the world, they don't want it for the people. they talk about the constitution, but they don't want to live by it. they talk be about poor farm but they want discrimination. they want to change this country and we, as one nation, stand up this day and say we will be there on november 2nd. we will not give up. now, that was on saturday. the next day this story pops. let me take you to exhibit a, bigot homophobe senator jim demint is trying to socially engineer public education in america. now, if the god father of the tea party his way, your kids will be indoctrinated with anti-women, anti-gay, anti-american ideas when it comes to education, according to the spartanburg, south carolina, herald journal. demint said if someone is openly homosexual, they shouldn't be teaching in the classrooms and he holds the same position on unmarried women with who are sleeping with her boyf

when you can see is that this is from the pact. what you see is the house. what you see here on the top back roof, there are a bunch of people standing on a roof in a relatively unsafe location. >> thank you. >> only think that -- data we can think about this was the blue angels stay. >> were you on the roof? >> that day. there was 16 people on the roof. >> thank you. >> good afternoon. scott chen says, planning department. -- this got sanchez -- scott sanchez, planning department. >> regarding the view from the public right away, i went out of the location and i walked down and found that there was not much of an impact on the view. it was probably a 5 foot stretch or so. there is a lot of vegetation. a lot had been recently cut. this is not sufficient to have an adverse finding. this is not public open space or a public park. this is not a feud that we would say that needs to be protected at all costs. those are the things that i wanted to update the board on. >> how is it noticed when a project is going to affect any of you from any public place? -- an vi

it is easier to vet for things than it is against them.nto this same trap in the last congress. and ran up some pretty big deficits. >> sean: i don't think is going to happen. i think if the republicans win, i think they stan they're on probation -- i think they understand they're on probation. >> i don't think the people who put them in are going to stanford nonsense. >> that would be fascinating. you think there are people on the ran side right now who will say if we are serious about cutting the deficit, we are willing to cut some of this entitlement spending and say to older americans, you know your medicare payments -- >> i don't think the are willing to say that. i think there are tea party members who believe that. they are going to force republicans to face the real issues which are entitlements. >> i don't even see from it the people who are endorsed by the tea party saying -- >> yes. [ talking over each other ] >> sean: they are gonna roll back and repeal health care and obama obviously is going to oppose it. they are going to mo

she is saying to kids in schools, what is that?t is just saying our stuff somehow or another got on their land. we are taking, we are stealing from the third world. because we are the oppressor. that explains it. call it whatever you want. these are the facts. this is the explanation. now we're moving from fact. everything you've just seen are facts. but in case you haven't been able to pin it together yet, i want to move. can we move the anti-colonial stuff over to this screen, please? keep it here. i want you to be able to see that. thank you. now we're going to move to opinion. and we're going to go back to dinesh d'souza. because he lives this over in india. your grandfather and your father. hi, dinesh. how are you? >> hello. >> glenn: your father and grandfather were anti-colonialists? >> yes. i came of age in post impendence india and i understand this ideology well. >> glenn: nothing to do with race or anything else. >> the british didn't come to india because we were brown. they came to india to conquer land, rule, racism w

>>guest: it is a slur, a personal attack. this is not what california is about. this is not what people hope for in political campaigns. it is not what is right about this country. and i will do what i can do, which is get the campaign back on track. california deserves a debate about solutions, about our records, about our policy differences, and how we will get california back on track. so, obviously, i was stunned by his lack of sensitivity last night to the issue but my view is we have 20 days to go, let's talk about what will get california out of the ditch and back to the great state that it was and can be again. >>neil: did jerry brown prior to this ever call, talk to you, personally, e-mail you, or try to apologize directly to you? >>guest: no. >>neil: do you feel as he feels that, however offensive that term might be, that it is not in the same league as the "n" word? >>guest: that's up to every californian to make that determination. it is clear what went on. especially women in california know what is going on here and everyone has to make up their own

the interesting thing is, the race is close. all the barbara boxer is one of the more progressive members of congress and is very vulnerable to these attacks on incumbents and the obama administration, this whole anti-incumbent fervor, barbara boxer is a very savvy campaigner and has been written off many times before and has always bounced back and survived. from her first race in 1982 when nobody expected her to be elected to congress, she has always managed to pull it off. it looks like she probably will pull it off, depending on who shows up to vote. that is always the trick. it will be a major question because what is on the ballot that will drop progressives and the obama base to come out and vote? that is the question in everyone's mind. >> it is interesting in both these races, senate and the governor's race, you have to of former ceo's, carly fiorina and meg whitman. on veteran're taking politicians. both are making the case we hear around the country that government has failed, that anyone who has been in government fo

jonathan what is happening? >> there has been at partial power shut down because of the little company's on-site who provides hydrogen's for people as actually had some of their systems go offline so because of their refinery being at a loss for error clearing the hydrogen and they have been burning and off it, it is that chain reaction because the gases that are usually is to turn the oil into fuel is getting back up in the chambers and machines from what used to process it and it is causing a situation where they have to get the gas out or it the it factory will explode severe use the devices that actually burning off some of the gases to relieve pressure inside of the machinery and that is why there's a huge fire coming out of one of the smokestacks that can be seen for miles and miles around the refinery. it is exploring black smoke into some of the neighborhoods and the strong winds blowing into the north, that stream of smoke is actually going at a 45 degree angle and spreading very rapidly into the areas

it is pretty challenging, and because there is such a diversity of community that is involved with the service territory. certainly. >> i don't want to step on your presentation, but we know that these things are taxpayer dollars. taxpayers are looking for some sort of visual benefit. they know they are getting clean water, but they are also looking for more than that today. we know that whether you are a public agency or a private company, the people that you serve are expecting much more from their providers, not just in terms of the utility that they provide, but in terms of the will and the investment and sustainability. and into the community itself, they want to be able to see that. supervisor maxwell: some of the things you have mentioned are things that people just expect these days. we have integrated a lot of those things, so i am thinking of it as community benefits. it could include this, but i was just thinking of it in a more narrowed view. >> it is important for the thinking of the commission. should it be something that only benefits the community and doesn't benefit sf

she is fox news contributor, tamara holder is here.kowski is here, a decorated military vet running for congress in michigan. thanks for being with us. you are defending what brown's campaign and the way they've handled this issue involving referring to meg whitman as a whore? >> i'm not defending anybody calling anyone a whor, e. he did not say it. it was a recorded conversation. >> sean: so what it is out there in the public domain. the person responsible why doesn't he fire that person. would don imus be fired? >> absolutely. it wasn't sexual. if it was a republican they would be demanding the guy got fired for the national organization for women not to demand that. democrats have a history of throwing women under the bus, hillary clinton for example. >> republicans have a history of throwing women under the bus. [ talking over each other ] >> you cannot say that. [ talking over each other ] >> that is very hypocritical. >> how is it him krall about what? [ talking over each other ] >> the democratic party is the party that always m

discussing the right stuff is that is the rate.he real problem, as we said before, is the rebalancing question. and the move in the rate will be more consequence than the balancing of the country. i think everybody understands this, there's no way for the global economy to be stable, to achieve growth everywhere if it's not done in a cooperative way. again, that's the message from the framework that we're going to provide for the g-20. i think it's more and more understood by the authorities. and from what i expect, the prospects of this idea would be strong enough to avoid conflicting situation and trying to take into account the argue of the different parts to find a win-win situation which exists which is described in this framework. the win-win situation in which everybody is better off rather than trying to find the best solution to the global problem which as we know doesn't work. host: that was the i.m.f. managing director speaking after the i.m.f. world bank meetings over the weekend. desmond lachman is our guest. you said

what is the issue is the prevailing zoning if zoning is rh2 and i am conflicted by demolishing a house of sound quality which has always been a big issue in this commission but what i am more concerned about is building a significantly larger home that does not provide an additional small unit to fully realize the zoning. the fact that this resident on the entire mrok is quite similar and only says to me that we are encouraging enlarging homes in an r2 and without meeting the prevailing density standard. if we want to improve the home and say that megamansioning in an r2 district is cave, but then we done zone and we can't support this viable project, otherwise i personally see a conflict. the five homes going with this particular project all obey a common setback. this house would move into the setback and also really starts to be much, much deeper than the houses which are on the south and you don't see that in the depiction within this packet, but if you go to a1-1 and a1-2, there are only three parcels shown. this is something that should show the ample information about that in oh

that is not what california is about is not let ourselves.ple know, i think every californian especially women know exactly what is going on your a deeply offensive term to women. >> did you chastise you chairman pete wilson called the congresswhores to the public sector >> union. you know better than that that is a completely separate wing of the fact you're defending your campaign slur and a personal attack on me i do not think it befitting of california or the opposite you're running for >>. it was a private conversation with the conversion and then i not sure it's legal. i am sorry it happened, that is not representing anything other than things happen. the issue is pension reform and you got the endorsement of the union because they said i would be too tough on unions and public pension that i will take that. >> the third candidate for governor who was not invited to last night's debate the person on the screen green cruddy and it showed up anyway, despite the fact that she had no limitation. and that she was brisk week or less did by se

that is our -- continue. that is our desire. and, you know, we will continue to work this throughout the week. >> do you expect the prime minister to announce tomorrow, wednesday, that he will extend the freeze on building in the settlement for another 60 days? >> i believe i understand that the prime minister had a meeting with the security cabinet today and may well have a follow-on meeting tomorrow. we've made our position clear to the israeli government. but obviously they have decisions to make and so do the palestinians. >> have you got any indication that he would? >> again, it is our desire that the current negotiations continue. we're trying to create, you know, conditions that enable that to occur. and that is our -- continues to be our message to both sides. >> just one more. [inaudible] the negotiator said the palestinians will stay in the negotiations, come what may. is that something that was coordinated with you? >> we believe the only way to seek what both the palestinians and the israeli dess sire is by continui

there is no history of it, is there? >> yes, there was. >> we were hurt like three years ago. >> it was awhile ago. >> but the good news 1* clearly they didn't strike bo nana republic because all four of us made it in there and we are safe. >> i got the memo. >> i love our new fall colors. >> animation is the best way to get the news. >>> i do believe it could have been prevented if we didn't ban the pesticide. we have to bring it back, and i have a feeling we will bring it back because it is the only thing that works. >>> from pet to pals. as a duo they blow-o. i speak of mahmoud and hugo. like two awful tastes that taste awful together, they are joining forces to establish a new world order that will eliminate western dominance over global global affairs. this week ahmadinejad and his counterpart chavez signed agreements between the countries. and they denounced u.s. imperial itch. -- imperialism. here is a tape of the two meeting at the presidential palace. >> most people don't realize you are iranian. >> yeah. i twee

one of the first rules of war is no to the enemy is -- is know how the enemy is, what they care aboutw they operate. an intelligence expert who worked for general petraeus, and general petraeus set him up with a special intelligence unit called the center of excellence to actually get on a note around with people in afghanistan -- get on the ground with people in afghanistan to learn about tribes and villages and do the work to answer these questions about who the other side is. as he got in there, he said at general petraeus is the blind leading the blind. we don't know enough. we now note a good deal more -- now know a good deal more. if it is enough to inform what we do on the ground in fighting the insurgency there and protecting the population, which is the hearts and minds strategy of counterinsurgency. host: thiss from 2007, on the president bush being in a bubble. >> we were specifically asking if you get outside advice from people like brent scoroft, national security adviser to bush's father. he said, "no, i am in a bubble. i don't have outside advisers. i relied on my work

is not what that happen simultaneously the fed's mission and this is unstated is to provide continuous asset price inflation and that's generally done through a low interest rates lack of regulation. and also as we go along with subsidies and supporting these from a standpoint of orthodoxy. that so the quotes like a good thing and you can course play back any of the things it means ben was saying during both dot com and the housing bubble justifying. his policies in photographs of prices or just out to crashes then the policy as a ship pretty quickly to preventing asset prices from crashing because then what happens is that the class and fire economy spills over into the so called real time in their production consumption which happened in a really serious way that the theories. somewhat in japan since there are midnight in ninety eight and is playing itself out in its own water now so those are the people the folks in the united states are a gassed up this growing wealth and income gap and the growing problems did they did the industrialization of the economy and we'll get to your you

what is called reintegration and what is called a reconciliation. here is the difference. in reintegration it is focused on the battlefield and individual fighter that is ready to go home. we find more and more of those of, as reported by the military commanders. these are mostly young men who were either intimidated into adjoining the taliban or chose to do so through family or village pressure or because it was a way to make a living. for many years the taliban paid a lot better than anything else in afghanistan. this was one of the problems as to why we lost the momentum that everybody thought we were building in the prior administration because there was no real emphasis on helping to employ young men and helping to build a security force so that there was a choice. one of the first things we did was raise the pay of those who joined the police and army. we began to get many more recruits. and in reintegration, if they're willing to leave the battlefield and renounce violence and any connection to al qaeda and abide by the laws of afghanistan we will help facilitate th

it is hard to to imagine. it is -- it is hard to imagine. the parties are here and i don't even know if this would be a matter of convenience to decide that we would aggregate them. there are some real issues involved in the jurisdiction request that we should here since the parties are here. >> is there anything in writing that you can give? >> the president is suggesting that you write something tonight. >> i'd tend to agree. >> i'm a little confused because when i went to the appeals board i was told i should hold on because there is a permanent in the process and i can appeal this because this revises the original permit. i have been patient. i have gone online everyday and i have gone to the staff on an everyday basis. the permit was still there. much of what i plan to say is that the plans as originally submitted are insufficient and then the construction as constructed is different from that and it appears in the description of the revision has reconfigured that and it reconfigured kitchens. maybe the position of the kitchen's has bee