. >> i think ththat the amount off coverage isis adequatate. we hae seen that the three mile island accident, the amount was far below the amount of coverage provided. we have no other experience in the united states of an n accident that would d rh the level of $12.6 bibillion, and none is expected, given the strong safefety standards e enfd by the u.snuclear regulatory commiion. >> we have a very strong regulatory process, a set of regulations. we do inspections. we have a strong enforcement process to handle when regulations aren't being follllowed, and d those thiningl combine--you knknow, help to gie us contntinued assurance e that nuclelear power is safe. >> after fukushima, steps were taken to review safety at u.s. nuclear plants. >> right now we are a little bit more than 2/3rds of the way through a 90-day review that we're doing to see if there are any immediate short-term issues that need to be addressed to deal with the events at fukushima. >> fukushima reinvigorated this discussion of how n.r.c.c. considers laland contamination, ece