remains, in many ways alive, these are real artists, like the artist performed by efremov, and like iskremassfortunately, have a tragedy in this a revolution that does not spare anyone on its path, even its creators and those who create its artistic world, the artistic underside, again a tragic ending, it was approved, the film turned out, but how was this film received? how did mita’s contemporaries evaluate him? well, this is a complex story, still a little mysterious for me, because mita himself says that the film went on the shelf. what do we see from the documents? according to documents , the film was accepted at the end of 69. the film was shown at the opening of the seasons at the cinema house, it at that time it was also called the comedy about askrimas. then they showed it to the secretariat of the union of cinematographers, where people gathered who still remembered quite well the beginning of the twenties, sergei yutkevich was there , he reacts to them, somehow they don’t like all this, it feels like our hero is the eye of a drinker in the desert, well, your ending , why does your