islamic front, islam is now divided. bashir‘s through so many of them out. which met with the approval of many people, including pro—democracy supporters, actually, when that happened. because they didn't want the islamist. i believe the islamist now, they want to remove. but the difference is that they wanted to use their system. you have been here before, having to? in 2013 when we saw protest against omar al—bashir. 200 people died at that time. this umbrella opposition group came together, calling for a new democracy in sudan. you said we have come together to remove the 1—party regime. sue dan tribune newspaper hailed it as a breakthrough. what happens? nothing. omar al—bashir was still in power 60s later. why would it be different this time? as you know, it is a process. it is not an event. it is accumulations of what happened in 2013. it produced what is taking place now. this one is wider. the regime is bankrupt. the regime economically is not like it was in 2013. and there are many new factors. i believe the sudanese this time we'll get a new social political dispensation that they deserve. what are you going around asking the international community to do, because you are visiting various countries, saying disengage with omar al—bashir. what is it you are saying? well, number one, in europe we are saying to the europeans there isa we are saying to the europeans there is a new situation. we have to consider this new situation. business as usual will not work. you have to disengage the strategic dialogue that the uk and europe is having with al—bashir. it will not work, it will not bear fruits, and we are saying that bashir is a danger to everybody, because bashir is denying 6 million sudanese space in their own country, that is why we are looking for europe. internally displaced people? internally displaced, they are potential immigrants. if you want to resolve it, let us fix our country, let us give those guys an opportunity within a country, and the sudanese, they never expect to go outside sudan. it is only because of the dictatorship, because of genocide, because of war crimes, aggression that bashir is inflicting on them. as well as internally displaced people and refugees themselves, sadhana is also a key transit country for african migrants, and indeedin country for african migrants, and indeed in 2016 was apparently the fifth biggest source of refugees globally, and therefore the european union gives sudan tens of millions of euros every year because it wants it to help them with their migration policy, and also counter terrorism. they are still co—operating with saddam, regardless of what you say to them. i believe the strategic solution is to remove this regime, this dictatorship, and to have a democratic government in sudan that will allow sudanese to have their own life within their own space. again, the security of bashir are trading, and they are using those immigrants asa trading, and they are using those immigrants as a business. actually they are sending them to europe. meanwhile, they are covering it up with the co—operation they have with some of the european countries. what europe is doing is not a solution. europe is doing is not a solution. europe need to seek a new solution, to help the people themselves to fix their life and you have a democratic system. all right, it is notjust europe, though, is it? united states, we saw in 2017 how the united states lifted some of the sanctions against sudan. it is still on the list of states that sponsor to terrorism, but the united states says their removal from that list work in progress and they expect that to happen sometime soon. the americans are still core operating a great deal with the sudanese, for example, the foreign minister said in november last year the level of cooperation that sadha na in november last year the level of cooperation that sadhana is happening with the united states in particular and with the region at large, encountering terrorism, is exemplary. the americans, the commander of the us combined joint task force in the horn of africa, james craig, praised saddam's effo rts james craig, praised saddam's efforts to achieve regional security and stability. that is the kind of mood music that is going on. well, they know very well sudan is organic to terrorism, and they will never change because they are cooperating now with the united states. what is needed for america and europe to change their policy. this is as usual will not ring an end to terrorism, or the end immigration in sudan, because this government is the same government that hosted ben martin, it is the same government thatis martin, it is the same government that is involved in many incidents in destroying the american embassy in kenya and tanzania, and other incidents. —— bin laden. so the americans need to rely on other directions, for that reason we welcome the statement by the secretary of state in his interview, mike pompeo, that there is a need for a new policy, the consider the situation of the sudanese people. so those guys who are ruling sudan, they base their rule in a very narrow social base. they need to appeal to the spirit of democratisation, of peace in sudan. but, i mean, the sudanese government, of course, would say that it doesn't in any way sponsor terrorism, some of the act that you have mentioned, the tragedies such as the one in kenya, they will say, look, you know, we didn't have any involvement in that. and so that is the view that you propound. but i put it to you that it is falling on deaf ears. i have told you how the europeans are still co—operating, the americans still co—operating with sudan, and look at sudan's membership of the arab league. you know, as an arab country it has excellent relations with the united arab emirates, key allies, saudi arabia, the saudi minister of commerce and investment, on 24 january, said the king of saudi arabia has confirmed that saudi arabia has confirmed that saudi arabia would not hesitate to support sudan until it overcomes the current situation. the government in sudan has also said russia and turkey have offered assistance to it, economically. the united arab emirates is giving sudan $300 million as well as 1.1 2 million in tons of fuel. i could just go on and on. sudan has got friends and allies. that they should ask themselves one question. why this system has no impact. this is a corrupt government, this government politically is dead, and what they need, they need to reconsider that they are helping the very government that stood for decades against saudi arabia, and the emirates, and is loved, political islamsity of africa. really, because it, at kenya. it has problems with the islamist culture bug jihadist. when the minister visited kenya, the president said on six february i am happy to know that saddam is handling matters well and that situation in the country is under control. he praised saddam as a pillar of stability in the region. well, the status quo will not bring stability. it is not going to bring peace or democracy. sudan is highly involved in central africa, in south sudan, in libya. it is a source of instability in these countries. the political islam discourse will destroy africa, will cause the fabric —— because the fabric of africa is based on diversity. again, bashir has rules sudan for 30 years. this fact has to be considered. ok, so this fact has to be considered. ok, so he is wanted an international criminal court over his dealings, his attacks in the four, allegedly. and there are those now in sudan, like the chairman of your group —— darfur. there are those who say t