that the islamabad high court doesn't have jurisdiction because the territory of azad jammu anditory. but eventually, because the islamabad high court had taken a position that the isi sector commander was to appear, the inter—services intelligence, the sector commander was supposed to appear, and as a result of that, that generated enough pressure to ensure his release. and it's my view that, if all constitutional courts point the finger where the blame actually rests, on these intelligence agencies, there will be many more recoveries. would you say that that is fairly typical of the kind of case that you work on? in that case, the courts did say that your client, fahad shah, was illegally arrested and they ordered him to be produced. he remains, i think, charged with serious offences, including anti—terror legislation. but does that example not tell us that there is a check and balance on power? yes, i believe there is to some degree, with constitutional courts, but here, it's very subjective because it depends. we have another case that's ongoing in the lahore high court, raw