because no one is allowed to live but and that islamic sharia ok wasn't there and african union town day any evidence for what is the evidence do you have to make that statement that they want to take over the interfering on their head yet the evidence in the court on and it is you have to read one hundred strives in arabic in order to understand that the underlying foundation of islam is to take over i was all done to fly people until they believed in islam. ok this is what mohamed said what well that is that is. that is absolutely i'm kind of the reality of a person like me who is an eighth generation american whose parents are christian whose associates and friends and loved ones in many ways in many cases are christian no one has ever told me in any religious context that i've been in that the purpose of my life was to somehow overturn constitutional law and replace it with sharia that simply isn't true and nor is it true in agreement on. this in the muslim world that in which muslims are way way way in which muslims or either a majority or a minority so i think you're simpl

american constitution they are here to eventually go to plays the american constitution with islamic sharia because no one is allowed to live up and that. i was all done. people did they believe in islam. this is what mohammad said well thought well that is that is that all we know that is absolutely contrary to the reality of a person like me who is an eighth generation american whose parents are christian whose associates and friends and loved ones in many way in many cases are christian no one has ever told me in any religious context that i've been in that the purpose of my life was to somehow overturn constitutional law and replace it with sharia that simply isn't true and nor is it true in agreement on radio you know your place is in the muslim world that in which muslims are way way way in which muslims are either i majority or a minority so i think you're simply taking in that precinct your perceptions and trying and you're right and you're trying to universalize it in a way that's not true. and you. want. now the right to weld of microbiology just got a whole lot bigger thanks to t

constitution they are here to eventually thought if i made it count one stick your shin with islamic sharia because no one is allowed to live and that it's. ok this is what mohammad said well but well that is that is that all of that is contrary to the reality of a person like me who is an eighth generation american whose parents are christian whose associates and friends and loved ones in many ways in many cases are christian no one has ever told me in any religious context that i've been in that the purpose of my life was to somehow overturn constitutional law and replace it with sharia that simply isn't true nor is it true in agreement on radio you have your places in the muslim world in which muslims are way way way in which muslims or either a majority or a minority so i think you're simply taking a nap so you can work out and try again you're right in your trying to universalize it in a way that's not true. all right i crosstalk is coming your way in about an hour and a quarter from now this is all to you live from moscow now many would agree that sharing videos and pictures online is

islamic congregaion. we do not believe sharia law should come here. >> even as they stand up, christians express their relief in the work place remain concerned that political correctness would drive them out of theijob. cbn news, london, england. >>> when christn world news returns, in africa, the killer creating millions of orphans and children's book that is giving them hope. >> aids is the leading cause of death in many african countries, for example in uganda, more than 1 million childr have lost one or both pares. now a book is bringing a message of hope. here is canaday's story from western uganda. my search took me some 9,000 miles from home to the you uganda city of entebbe. a chartered plane through us an hour west. the place was so remote we had to land on a grass runway. it was f here in the mountains that i met 35-year-old asimla and 13-year-old that had intimate knowledge of canaday's story. >> do you fear you could become like canaday's ory? >> i am afraid of becoming an orphan. >> it is a real life account of an african girl that loses mother and father. she is left to fend for herself and 5

the idea of sharia and the islamic course and process now it is very highly centralized.t the moment there's no shura. that will weaken the islamic behind the ncp. they need to deal with them. i question the role of the regime change. so there's a lot of countries in the region, utopia, they think the region change shouldn't be the way to go forward. it's hard to maintain the stability because ncp has the stability of moneys, weapons, and for the north, ncp has the monopoly. you need to deal with the ncp and the major players and how to get strategic cooperation between the north and south and final political stability, political stability in the north cannot happen unless there is an openness for political dialogue for resolution of south sudan -- southern kurdufan and darfur, and resolution in darfur. i say this -- this cannot happen if there's no serious rethinking of the political system in the center and the restructuring of the state. maybe something is saying that this person is talking on behalf of the splm or the opposition party. and i don't know if anybody of t

sharia law be creeping into everyday american life... hidden inse a sandwich? it's called halal the proper islamic way to prepare food...ut there's me to halal than just muslim prayers and religious rial... already widely accepted in fran... it's gaining popularity in britain as well as the united states.. cbn's dale hurd uncovers the hidden dangers of halal foodentering the mainream culture... on the "700 ♪ [ male announcer ] with cable's bundle choices, there's not much to see. with at&t u-verse tv, you can record up to four shows at once on a single dvr. hey. yeah. my way home. [ femalennouncer ] you can even choose wireless voice service. he can't do that with cable. now you have your choice of offer call today to get u-vee tv and internet plus choose home phone or wireless ice service starting at $99 a month. orhoose to get $300 back via promotion cards with other qualifying bundles. bundle the services that fit your life. with u-verse tv, record and play back youshows any room from a single dvr. call now to get three services starting at $99 a month. or choose to get $300 back via promotion cards with other qualif

the idea of sharia and the islamic course and process now it is very highly centralized. at the moment there's no shura. that will weaken the islamic behind the ncp. they need to deal with them. i question the role of the regime change. so there's a lot of countries in the region, utopia, they think the region change shouldn't be the way to go forward. it's hard to maintain the stability because ncp has the stability of moneys, weapons, and for the north, ncp has the monopoly. you need to deal with the ncp and the major players and how to get strategic cooperation between the north and south and final political stability, political stability in the north cannot happen unless there is an openness for political dialogue for resolution of south sudan -- southern kurdufan and darfur, and resolution in darfur. i say this -- this cannot happen if there's no serious rethinking of the political system in the center and the restructuring of the state. maybe something is saying that this person is talking on behalf of the splm or the opposition party. and i don't know if anybody of

islam poses to the united states. this work led ultimately to the book sharia, threat to america those co-authored with frank gaffney, andrew mccarthy, jim woolsey and other members of the national security community. i'd recommend not put to you. in it, we describe the threat that islam presents to a free society. since we do not want to see our fellow countrymen as potential enemies of the state, we americans don't think that way. we don't want to think that way. the part of our problem is we really don't know how many muslims there are in the united states. we don't know how big of a problem this actually is. and to suggest that there may be a security threat raises the specious charges of bigotry. because it matters at some level just how many muslims they are. during the bush administration, they use the number of about 2.5 muslim americans. the pew research center in 2007 estimated there were 2.35 million muslims in the united states. the council on american islamic relations care with 5 million muslims in 2000. president obama in his cairo speech in june of 2009 put the number at 7 million. so there's quite a

hard-core islamic groups are pushing for sharia law, which is not about democratization, it's about theocracy. i absolutely believe that there are tons of people in egypt that are genuinely crying out for democracy. and i feel for those people, but i'm not sure what american foreign policy can do to make that reality. host: do you think the secretary of state or the president of the united states should be leery of any sort of agreement between elbaradei and the muslim brotherhood? caller: absolutely. this is what i think. any time cries for democracy, up in the midst of people -- come up from the midst of people who are starving -- i understand that the profit-sharing, because of the diminishing of oil prices -- it is a dangerous atmosphere to try to create a democratic shift and reach. it is ironic to me that the people -- as a book, not all -- and i do not want to make this political -- some who were criticizing the concept of george bush trying to make a shift -- shift iraq in a democratic direction. that had 10 times the possibility of happenings and this does. there is a piece in the wa

the idea of sharia and the islamic course and process now it is very highly centralized. at the moment there's no shura. that will weaken the islamic behind the ncp. they ned to deal with them. i question the role of the regime change. so there's a lot of countries in the region, utopia, they think the egion change shouldn't be the way to go forward. it's hard to maintain the stility because ncp has the stability of moneys, weapons, and for the north, ncp has the monopoly. you need to deal with the ncp and the major players and how to get strategic cooperation between the north and south and final political stability, political stability in the north cannot happen unless there is an openness for politicl dialogue for resolution of south sudan -- southern kurdufan and darfur, and resolution in darfur. i say this -- this cannot happen if there's no serious rethinking of the political system in the center and the restructuring of the state. maybe something is saying that this person is talking on behalf of the splm or the opposition party. and i don't know if anydy of the pr

the idea of sharia and the islamic course and process now it is very highly centralized. at the moment there's no shura. that will weaken the islamic behind the ncp. they need to deal with them. i question the role of the regime change. so there's a lot of countries in the region, utopia, they think the region change shouldn't be the way to go forward. it's hard to maintain the stability because ncp has the stability of moneys, weapons, and for the north, ncp has the monopoly. you need to deal with the ncp and the major players and how to get strategic cooperation between the north and south and final political stability, political stability in the north cannot happen unless there is an openness for political dialogue for resolution of south sudan -- southern kurdufan and darfur, and resolution in darfur. i say this -- this cannot happen if there's no serious rethinking of the political system in the center and the restructuring of the state. maybe something is saying that this person is talking on behalf of the splm or the opposition party. and i don't know if anybody of

islamic state and they always compare it to irn. i think there's no warrant to the charges that golan wants to take over and impose sharia law. >> i think, is an absurd fear. >> it is a civil society movement. >> sometimes they're accused of being a missionizing entity, and i don't know if anyone or otherwise would have turned into a muslim. >> for the time being both kredices and admires. for religion and ethics news weekly i'm lucky severson in houston. >>> we have a conversation today with investment banker james wolfensohn who was president of the world bank from 1995 to 2005. during those years he opened an unprecedented dialogue with religious groups. wolfensohn was born in australia and is now a u.s. citizen and he's written an autobiography known as a glowing life. kim spoke with him. >> during his decade as president of the world bank he was a force to be rec owned with. while he was praised to help the world's poor, people were protesting against him for not doing enough, wolfensohn sparked an unprecedented international conversation about poverty and development. i asked him if he believes the united states has a moral obliga

islam poses to the united states. this work led ultimately to the book sharia, threat to america those co-authored with frank gaffney,arthy, jim woolsey and other members of the national security community. i'd recommend not put to you. in it, we describe the threat that islam presents to a free society. since we do not want to see our fellow countrymen as potential enemies of the state, we americans don't think that way. we don't want to think that way. the part of our problem is we really don't know how many muslims there are in the united states. we don't know how big of a problem this actually is. and to suggest that there may be a security threat raises the specious charges of bigotry. because it matters at some level just how many muslims they are. during the bush administration, they use the number of about 2.5 muslim americans. the pew research center in 2007 estimated there were 2.35 million muslims in the united states. the council on american islamic relations care with 5 million muslims in 2000. president obama in his cairo speech in june of 2009 put the number at 7 million. so there's quite a bit of disc

islam poses to the united states. this work led ultimately to the book sharia, threat to america those co-authored with frank gaffney,arthy, jim woolsey and other members of the national security community. i'd recommend not put to you. in it, we describe the threat that islam presents to a free society. since we do not want to see our fellow countrymen as potential enemies of the state, we americans don't think that way. we don't want to think that way. the part of our problem is we really don't know how many muslims there are in the united states. we don't know how big of a problem this actually is. and to suggest that there may be a security threat raises the specious charges of bigotry. because it matters at some level just how many muslims they are. during the bush administration, they use the number of about 2.5 muslim americans. the pew research center in 2007 estimated there were 2.35 million muslims in the united states. the council on american islamic relations care with 5 million muslims in 2000. president obama in his cairo speech in june of 2009 put the number at 7 million. so there's quite a bit of disc

they agre and that, abolishing, not abolishing but to suspend the sharia laws come except to sudan as an array big, african but not an islamic. and to go for the constitutional review conference to review and put these constitution form an interim government with splm, political parties and all the civil society, the trade unions and so one can't add including the traditional. they all agreed. so after pressure, they moved from pow from the government. he formed again i government. and he areed finally on the constitutional conferenc that would have led, but who then, really quickly, made it coup? they did want that to happen. theyremoved a democratic. no, close the door for democratic conference and we know what happened. so that's why halfway the idea is to create that islamic country with the islamic organization of the islamic vement that, you know, how do i say, that it into that thinking, solidify the organization. of course, creating a system related to all the tribes and groups and so on. and then the rumors of the state. and then to go for federalism and decentralized, but they took it wrong. the military was suppos

recently, the issue of sharia and looking at the books in oklahoma that's being debated in the courts, the way that it is being used as the latest attack of how the islamizatione on quote of america not through warfare, but as the islamphobes call it, what are better ways and what should we be doing to engage these conversations on a national level and also a local level on issues, and i'll use the sharia situation since it's the most current as the starting point. >> i think we are faced with the biggest challenges that we are being represented by others. representational discourse damages our ability to really community kate the right way -- communicate the right way about issues that are political to us. i come back to the same issue that ultimately we ask the question who speaks to islam? if he continues to speak for islam or somebody else speaks for islam, then we need to have a countervoice, to have a voice in islam. i think at the moment we don't have that voice representing what we would call and educated information about our own tradition, and i think that's a draw back. there are so many voices that come from different sources. he is talking about