the subject of her latest book isler love ofnator chimpanzees. >> she has been called the woman who

the subject of her latest book isler love ofnator chimpanzees. >> she has been called the woman who redefined man as we think about chim mpanzees. >> i realized like us, they have a dark side. they are capable of violence, brutality and a kind of primitive law. >> i spoke to the steadfast scientist about changing technology? >> gis, gps, satellite imagery, mapping. >> experiments on animals, animal enclose user? >> susan, zoos. a bit about her ally days. >> i fell in love with tarzan and married the wrong jane. >> a new book about plants. can you draw the line for us between plants and chimpanzees? >> without plants, none of us would be here, chimpanzees, people or anything else. everything lives on plant food or lives on creatures that live on plant food. like honestly the plants put little roots into my brain and said, jane, you spent all your life helping animals: it's our turn now. so the book took its own life. you talk about the love affair between humans and plants. where did your love affair with plants begin? >> it began when i was a little girl growing up in my garden in england. i

the subject of her latest book isler love ofnator chimpanzees. >> she has been called the woman

isler: i think the president pretty much right on target. we would like him to be dealing with domestic policy, but the contingencies of or politics have led us into foreign-policy. i think his approach has led to very good decision-making. i think you yourself made the mistake when you read the opening statement. if you go back to videotape, and stumbled when he made your opening statement. advice that you the i would give the president, because i've known him since 1992 and have offered him advice. i think when he stood to the president, you should share what you share with him. i think other things he could be doing that he hasn't done yet. we'll see what he does in the future. let's listen to what the president had to say on this idea of a cautious approach. wherethere are occasions targeted, clear actions can be taken that would make a difference, then we should take them. we'll do them because somebody n office ina washington or new york thinks it would look strong. that is not how we make foreign policy. if you look at the results of