is the deal a threat to israel's existence, or could it make israel safer in the long run.uclear pressure it's "inside story". >>> welcome to "inside story", i'm sheila macvicar in for ray suarez. secretary of state john kerry was in guitar on monday, making the case for the iran nuclear deal to arab countries, a place not on his itinerary is israel. they have called the deal an historic mistake posing threats to israel and the region, he contends that lifting the sanctions iran will embolden tehran. binyamin netanyahu's concerns have been echoed by u.s. law lawmakers lawmakers, obama's team opposition. >> the agreement is not basements on expectations or understanding about what will be chosen to do. >> secretary of state john kerry is the salesman in the middle east, meeting in qatar with a number of gulf states, he is trying to convince quitics that the agreement with iran is not a threat. >> this agreement to some people's criticism did not focus on issues that we knew might take five years, 10 years to resolve. we focus the exclusively on iran's nuclear programme and t

it's not the israel of likud and the israel of the settlers. he has said several times his image of israel is that it is a pre-67 image which i believe is a mythic predisposition and i had many examples many times where we needed the president and he was there for us. in december of 2010 i was across the street from the white house going into the white house hanukkah party not to be missed. we are to have the christmas decorations up in the white house and the surreal look of all these jewish and various types of headwear among the reeds and mistletoe and the trees. i was ready to go to the hanukkah party and i got a call from the prime minister of israel using a voice that you don't want to hear him use. it's a panicked voice saying that a huge fire just broken out and 26 people were dead. it was the worst forest fire in israel's history. it was a sending him-we have nothing to stop it with. we had round of retardant. we had no extinguishing flames and the prime minster said go and talk to the president. the good news is i'm across the street

sometimes the image of israel he wants to see, it's not -- pre1967 israel.israel is much more democratic than it was before 1967, but no, i had many examples, many times where we needed the president and he was there for us, and in december 2010 i was across the street from the white house going into the party, not to be missed. you had the christmas decorations. you had jews in front of all the wreaths, mistle toe. i got a call from the prime minister of israel using a voice that you don't want to hear him use, panic slows, -- panic voice. 26 people were dead, it was the worst fire in israel history. we had nothing to stop it. we had run out of orange stuff on back of the plane. we're in trouble. prime minister says we have to stay, go in and talk to the president. >> the good news is i'm across the street. i'll go in and i'll ask for help. i ran into the first lad -- lady chief of staff, and i said, i have to see the president right away. i told her about the fire. come right in. go to to the president. israel needs you, this horrible fire consumed lives a

push for israel and palestine.i wish i could believe she might in fact bring about the kind of a change, but it is unrealistic expectation. in fact, you will recall that early in his presidency, when president obama succeeded partially in getting netanyahu to freeze the settlements, as it turned out, produced -- constructed larger and more settlements than they had done before. a freeze.st it was there was question that the israelis insist that they have a right to continue building for the next generation, kids who were being born, natural growth. it was hillary clinton as foreign minister said at the time, no natural growth, not even a single brick is permissible. so that might suggest to some that she is really tough and may in fact adopt a different approach to the israeli-palestinian conflict. i don't believe that to be the case. i don't think she's about to do that. and certainly, during the course of the election campaign, she is likely to say things to satisfy what the party believes it must say in order to

rabin wanted to end israel's military occupation of the west bank and gaza, israel's military rule over millions of palestinians, and he was elected by a small margin. so, you know, i think at the time -- and i covered israel at the time. i remember people talking about the country being divided about 50/50 between people who were in favor of handing back some of this territory and people who were absolutely against it. and during the course of his term, his popularity waxed and waned in part because his peace process set off a backlash of violence by the extremists on both sides, certainly on the palestinian side with hamas, the islamic group. this was the era where we see the first suicide bombings by palestinians against israelis, and that eroded the popularity of the peace process and the support for rabin as well. >> host: were you in israel on november 4, 1995? >> guest: yes, i was. i was a young journalist, and i was sent to coffer that news rally -- >> host: by "newsweek"? >> guest: no, i worked for reuters at time. and because rabin's popularity had been ebbing, this rally was

john: issue three -- israels migrant crisis. between 43,000 and 50,000 african migrants and asylum seekers are in limbo in israel. they came seeking escape from war and poverty, but israel does not want them, fearing their presence undercuts israels existential nature as a jewish state. until recently, many of these migrants were held in challenging conditions at detention facilities in remote areas of israel. but earlier this month, israels judiciary ruled that migrants who have been held for more than a year must be released. and now these migrants are desperately searching for work and housing. it is easier said than done. after all, under israeli law, these migrants are not entitled to public support in welfare or health care and are banned from working in major cities like tel aviv and eilat. question -- should israel do more to support african migrants? clarence, would you like to handle that? clarence: it's a very debatable subject. it's more complex than a lot of us americans know. for example, a lot of africans are jewi

do this or make israel do that. and, in fact, the leader of hezbollah likes to talk about the fragile society of israel and compare us to all kinds of description. i could also argue and i think this is something a lot of people share in israel that this is actually a sign of strength of the society that society is willing to take such big risk and knowingly, knowingly release archterrorist and the bloodiest murders you can think of -- murderers that kill babies and children knowingly and intentionally from prison to get one person back. this is a sign of strength, a sign of solidarity, a sign of commitment, and this makes the society actually stronger. and when the society is stronger, that country is also stronger. with all the vulnerabilities that this creates, i don't have, i cannot answer one of the other. this is an ongoing debate. i would say though that there has been some attempt lately in the last three years or so to try and set new rules, rules that would in a way limit the discretion of the government a

nixon suspected israel was developing nuclear weapons. as the defense secretary put it, if the israelis complete the development of a nuclear weapon within the next three to six months, which is quite possible, we will be powerless to do more than invoke sanctions. at the same time, israel was trying to obtain jericho missiles capable of carrying nuclear weapons. now the state department released hundreds of documents describing the arguments u.s. diplomats and generals had about the situation. they show the pentagon wanted to play tough. don't give the israelis the f-4 jets like these seen here unless the israelis abandon their nuclear weapons program. ultimately, the state department and national security adviser, henry kissinger, prevailed. they thought if they didn't the prime minister on the question, it would be easier to get her to make tough choices in the peace talks. >> there would be more debate. it was better to not announce anything, that they don't announce the fact they have weapons, don't test the weapon, to keep it concea

already we have held talks with israel on concluding another 10-year plan for assistance to israel. we can enhance support for areas like missile defense, information sharing, interdiction, all to help meet israel's pressing security needs, and to provide a hedge against any additional activities that iran may engage in as a consequence of sanctions relief. but i have also listened to the israeli security establishment, which warned of the danger posed by a nuclear-armed iran for decades. in fact they helped develop many of the ideas that ultimately lead to this deal. so to friends of israel, and to the israeli people, i say this, a nuclear-armed iran is far more dangerous to israel, to america, and to the world, than an iran that benefits from sanctions relief. i recognize that prime minister netenyahu disagrees, disagrees strongly. i do not doubt his sincerity, but i believe he is wrong. i believe the facts support this deal. i believe they are in america's interest, and israel' interest, and as president of the united states, it would be an obligation of my constitutional duty to

security assistance to israel. we can enhance, support, areas like interdiction all to help israel's security needs, and to provide a hedge against any additional activities that iran may engage in as a consequence of sanctions relief. but i have also listened to the israeli security establishment which warned of the danger posed by a nuclear armed iran, for decades. in fact, they help to develop many of the ideas that ultimately led to this deal. so to friends of israel, and to the israeli people, i say this a nuclear armed iran is far more dangerous to israel, to america, and to the world, than an iran that benefits from sanctions relief. i recognize that prime minister netanyahu disagrees, disagree strongly. i do not doubt his sincerity. i believe he is wrong. i believe the facts support this deal. i believe they are in america's interest and israel's interest and as president of the united states, it would be an obligation of my constitutional duty to act against my best judgment simply because it causes tempor

more than a -- that the state of israel has with its soldiers then israel has for the parents of the soldiers. the former generation because it's the mother and father in the state of israel expects to send kids at the age of 18 and they expect to do his best to make sure that there is a possibility for them to come back home this is what the state should do. so what has happened in the 80s was that since the different terrorist organizations saw that the government preferred to do everything forcibly and ordered not to conduct negotiations but is actively trying to -- by the way with a terrible price. we have cases of both hostages and soldiers that participated in the release of hostages. i'm sure we are where of the case where we had airplanes that were affected to uganda and the israelis held hostages at the airport there and there was a very heroic release of them. actually most of the hostages got back safe and sound. there was a lady who was hospitalized and she died but actually we took losses and the famous one was a prime minister. so in the 80s they saw a change in the str

is israel really out of the gaza strip? mouin: no. as a matter of international law, israel remains the occupying power in the gaza strip, and this is a position taken by the international committee, the red cross, and others. ,srael has done a redeployment withdrawing its military bases and it's a legal colonial subsidence -- and it's a legal colonial settlements. it is in fact in full control of the gaza strip, or at least in effective control of the gaza strip, by continuing to control the boundaries, the airspace, the naval space, and so on. most importantly, by periodically launching devastating assaults on the gaza strip that have resulted in thousands of primarily civilian actual fees. aurore: on the other hand, israel says militants routinely fire rockets into its territory, and in the past they have built tunnels, attempting to infiltrate israel to smuggle weapons, so there are concerted -- there are sick security -- there are security concerns. what is your response to that? a matter ofl as policy rejected as a matter of pri

of israel.th our best of friends we've made our case to president obama. we are making it to the senators and congressman who will decide the fate of this deal in congress. we're telling them that this is a bad deal that endangers israel's security. when the president of the united states and secretary of state john kerry say they believe this deal is better for america and better for israel, i have no doubt that they're being sincere. we just disagree with their judgment. we think this deal will endanger israel security. in israel this view is shared by the prime minister, by the head of the opposition, by 30 out of 33 members of our foreign affairs defense committee. moses didn't have those kind of numbers. >> the former head of mossad, for example, disagrees. >> we're a jewish state. there are a lot of opinions. we're a democracy. we are not unanimous on anything. the overwhelming majority of the israeli people, all the security establishment actually responsible for the security of the count

security assistance to israel. we can enhance support for areas like missile defense, information sharing, interdiction all to help meet israel's pressing security needs. and to provide a hedge against any additional activities that iran may engage in as a consequence of sanctions relief. but i have also listened to the israeli security establishment which warned of the danger posed by a nuclear armed iran for decades. in fact they helped develop many of the ideas that ultimately led to this deal. so to friends of israel and to the israeli people i say this. a nuclear armed iran is far more dangerous to israel to america, and to the world than an iran that benefits from sanctions relief relief. i recognize that prime minister netanyahu disagrees, disagrees strongly. i do not doubt his sincerity. but i believe he is wrong. i believe the facts support this deal. i believe they are in america's interests and israel's interests. and as president of the united states it would be an obligation of my constitutional duty t

is critical to israel's survival.other country is going to be with them as we have been with them. there's a difference of opinion that is not spoken much about and i would come back to the united states and say to my thetary advisers, lay out contingencies. if this deal does not go through and sanctions come off from other countries, what does that mean? what options do we have? even though senator mccain says war is not an option, one commentator said this week in the "wall street journal" saying it's time to bomb iran now before they have nuclear weapons. so this is going to be a serious consequential debate and vote. i think the members of congress going to israel will get the israeli point of view, but they will want to talk to others to see how strong that sentiment is and come back here and talk to the american people. i think the president is not speaking to the general assembly today. he's talking to the american people because the american people according to polls are about two to one against this agreement

they cannot cross into israel for work or to go to the west bank. and the only exist is through egypt where people spend days at the border. >> i felt like i left to go to another country, you know? >> you went to another country. >> so you think i did the right thing? >> oh, forget it. >> forget it? >> yeah. >> they'll lynch you. you know? because they don't have too many trees. i don't know where they'll handing you from. >> i'm always eager to come here because this is my home. and then when i go back, i take with me a lot of guilt leaving these people behind. >> when are we going to get to the humane level? people should be incensed. not just the palestinians. we should fight arabs and jews to preserve that. >> my opinion is that both sides, people are tired, fatigued and brainwashed and they will not reeble in a way that they would march? the streets. people are saying i care about my four corners and my garden, and it's out of my control and i don't see this rebellion happening. >> clearly i'm the optimist of 2002 of us. in fact, i believe tha

israel says it's important to detain objectives. they say on tuesday, it's the only option, held without charge by an occupying force. >> palestinian can says israel is acting outside of institutional law. they should have charged him. tried him. and give evidence that he hid something against the law, against the occupation law, and gaol him. they cannot arrest people. there's a rule of law in the world, there's the international agreements and the geneva convention. israel has not done anything to work within the community. israel have done this for a long time. >> it's not the first time. israel is acting with criminal intent against the palestinians, trying to bring them into submission by humiliating one or two or three of each village in toward to keep the palestinians under occupation. israel has not respected human rights. as long as you are not jewish. you have no lights. you are treated like a subhuman. the head of the emergency relief coordinator says it's incomprehensible. they made the comments in the conflict. gabriel

, it is a threat to israel.ou are seeing all kinds of pressure being used almost more than debate. roger: this is the most divisive issue in the american jewish community for a long time for it even within families, you have fiery disagreements as to whether this deal is overall good for israel, good for the united states, good for the middle east, or it's not. on the one hand you have aipac lobbying heavily against the deal. on the others you have the much more liberal organization. it is in that context, and my column is partly about that, the prime minister netanyahu weighed the jewishin with community here and in essence said, this deal will give iran hundreds of bombs within years. wild hyperbole, that is not true. said the deal would allow iran to have its yellow cake and eat it. facile lines.se this deal is not perfect. in diplomacy you never get perfection. the naturaltered fuel cycle. the question is what do you do about it right secretary kerry and the president have tried to that ringth a deal fences

security assistance to israel. we can enhance support for areas like missile defense, information sharing, interdiction, all to help meet israel's pressing security needs. and to provide a hedge against any additional activities that iran may engage in as a consequence of sanctions relief. but i have also listened to the israeli security establishment which warned of the danger posed by a nuclear armed iran for decades. in fact, they helped develop many of the ideas that ultimately led to this deal. so the friends of israel and to the israeli people i say this -- a nuclear armed iran is far more dangerous to israel, to america, and to the world than an iran that benefits from sanctions relief. i recognize that prime minister netanyahu disagrees. disagrees strongly. i do not doubt his sincerity. but i believe he is wrong. i believe the facts support this deal. i believe they are in america's interest and israel's interest and as president of the united states, it would be an obligation of my constitutional duty to a

i'm not for israel because israel hasn't signed any nuclear nonproliferation treaties. haven't allowed anybody to inspect their nuclear weapons, and iran -- you know, it's just insane. this whole policy is insane. >> caller mentioned chuck schumer, the new york senator. politico writing about his efforts on the nuclear deal with iran. chuck schumer working the phones is the headline on iran. he calls colleagues to explain his decision and assure them he will not be whipping opposition, in other words whipping votes against the president. also on that aipac trip, another israel lobbying group in washington is j-street. they have released an ad campaign on their view. here's a look. >> the nuclear agreement with iran contains the toughest inspection program in history with inspectors on the ground and around-the-clock monitoring at all nuclear sites. israeli security experts say this agreement is the best existing option, the best possible alternative, it must not be rejected. this deal prevents iran from producing a nuclear weapon. that's good for israel, good for americ

israel has to be vigilant. insists it cannot depend on any other country, even its great friend, the united states, for its own security. seriouslye to take concerns in israel. partly due tos, american military and whichigence assistance, my administration has provided , israelcedented levels can defend itself against any conventional danger, whether from iran directly or its proxies. on the other hand, a nuclear armed iran changes that equation. that is why this deal ultimately must be judged by what it achieves on the central goal of preventing iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon. that.eal does exactly i say this as someone who has done more than any other president to strengthen israel's security. and i have made clear to the israeli government that we are prepared to discuss how we can deepen that cooperation even further. already, we have held talks with israel on concluding another 10 year plan for u.s. security assistance to israel. areas enhance support for like missile defense, information sharing and

this would be unacceptable in israel. the government cannot be exhorted in the way it has been by the terrorists organizations that has confront us because they know there's no limit on the numbers. i should say here, we are asked and we paid a price also for some idea on the medical conclusion of a kidnapped soldier, if he's alive or dead, we were asked to pay for corpse of dead sold -- soldiers. this was a serious attempt to lay down rules. other attempts most public was in some legislation that was introduced that also limits the authorities. before that it was the president's authority to pardon prisoners that were sentenced to life, terrorists that murdered people but also other terrorists and not just about terrorists, it's about murderers of this kind at large. this situation, again, hopefully we will not get to another situation of this sort, but it would be a different attempt, maybe, and a different experience for the government and maybe the minister of defense who is now -- is getting more powers and authoriti

security assistance to israel. we can enhance support for areas like missile defense, information sharing, interdiction -- all to help meet israel's pressing security needs, and to provide a hedge against any additional activities that iran may engage in as a consequence of sanctions relief. but i have also listened to the israeli security establishment, which warned of the danger posed by a nuclear-armed iran for decades. in fact, they helped develop many of the ideas that ultimately led to this deal. so, to friends of israel, and to the israeli people, i say this, a nuclear-armed iran is far more dangerous to israel, to america, and to the world than an iran that benefits from sanctions relief. i recognize that prime minister netanyahu disagrees -- disagrees strongly. i do not doubt his sincerity. but i believe he is wrong. i believe the facts support this deal. i believe they are in america's interest and israel's interest. and as president of the united states, it would be an abrogation of my constitutional dut

for israel it is, extential. and i think the prime freedom of israel is right to oppose. this is not politics. it is out of anxiety and belief that he is prevented to prevent a second holocaust. president has done a lot for israel security, but if iran becomes nuclear and the deal could end up with a nuclear iran, then all of that help will be absolutely no use. and israel will be the target of iran and you know what i ask americans to do is not to believe us and not just to listen to us? listen to the iranians and what they say when they chant death to america and wipe israel off of the face of the map and denotice the holocaust. they have lied before and they will lie and cheat and try to deceive the world and become nuclear. >> ambassador, the administration and white house disagrees with the sentiment but they are sensitive to israel feeling besieged. that is the language that secretary kerry used in the interview with the atlantic. i want to read you a small part of the interview as it pertains to israel and this is what secretary kerry said about the iran nuclear de

. >>> i'm in the gaza strip ten years after israel withdrew all of its settlers, coming up, we will hearm palestinians and israelis about how the effects of this so called disengagement are still being felt today. >>> waging war on the syrian economy, how the opposition is using foreign currency to undermine the government. ♪ china and south korea have criticized a speech by japan's prime minister marking 70 years since the end of the second world war and expressed deep remorse over japan's past saying future generations should not be obliged to apologize and said japan should have made a statement on the nature of the war of military and aggression and its responsibility on the war and said japan should have made a sincere apology to the countries affected and made a clean break of the past of the military aggression rather than being evasive on this major issue of principle. south korea's president said japan's prime minister should have gone further with his apology and the comments left much to be desired and called on japan to match its words with actions. >> translator: from now on

and israel's including netanyahu giving him credit for that. they do. and people in the military establishment. but is there any way that the president could take out his, some sense of disdain for the way the prime minister's acted. >> i think the only way is a way that's being quietly talked about is for the accord had the united states had in mind in the palestinian peace during last intense rounds of negotiations with secretary kerry with the territorial line running at the 1967 divide. for that to be published in some form and then contained in a resolution, in the united nations security council, that the united states would not veto. in other words israel would realize if it carries on in the current course of expanding settlements on the whole not being serious about a piece with the pal stainians and the palestinian leadership is plenty at fault too. if israel continues down that path it may no longer be able to rely on the consistent u.s. veto in the united nations of anything deemed to be against israel's interests as those interests are defi

their conventional capabilities will never compare with israel's and our commitment to israel's qualitative military edge helps guaranty that. over the last several years iran has had to spend billions of dollars to support its only ally in the arab world, bashar al-assad. even as he has lost control of huge chunks of his country. and hezbollah suffered significant blows on this same battlefield. and iran like the rest of the region is being forced to respond to the threat of isil in iraq. so contrary to the alarmists who claim that iran is on the brink of taking over the middle east, or even the world, iran will remain a regional power with its own set of challenges. the ruling regime is dangerous and it is repressive. we will continue to have sanctions in place on iran's support for terrorism and violation of human rights. we will continue to insist upon the release of americans detained unjustly. we will have a lot of differences with the iranian regime. but if we're serious about confronting iran's destablizing activities, it is hard to imagine a worse approach than blocking this deal.

since then hamas has conducted three wars with israel, and israel has made reconstruction almost impossibitye they say they don't know how much more suffering they can endure they are happy that the settlers are gone. >> imtiaz tyab joins us live from gaza strip. it seems pretty clear from both sides that a lot of anger and bitterness remains. >> reporter: indeed, a lot of anger and bitterness both on the descraifl side and in gaza. i'm here in goosh katif, an umbrella name for all the settlements that remains. a few outbuildings are here, effectively disused, a bit of graffiti on the walls and really just sort of gives you a sense of the shell of what was once israel's settlement program here in the gaza strip. another building here an administrative building used at the time of this settlement. the settlement which had been in the gaza strip for many, many decades and was home to around 8 8,500 settlers. there is a university here now but life while the stler settlee here, i'm here with yad laham, yad, tell us what life was like ten years ago before the israeli settlers withdrew from here?

this was a large israel settlement.t was home to more than 8,500 israelis and a large israeli military presence. it was also off limits to most palestinians palestinians. >> that's left are a few disused buildings. while al-astal said he is happy they left as part of the disengagement of the gaza strip, he is angry at how things are now. trans we live in a big prison. we can't move outside the gads strip which makes life hell for us. the occupation is the reason for all of our suffering as the israel is control everything. we deserve dignity. >> reporter: although israelis withdrew, israel's government never managed to truly disengage. without a political settlement with the palestinians, it exerted it's control over gaza and its people through its ongoing economic siege and repeat rounds of military violence. the so-called disengagement of gaza sharply divided israeli society at the time when the deadline to leave expired on august 15th, 2005, the remaining settlers were removed by force. aziz was one, originally from

. >> in the gaza strip ten years after israel withdrew all of its settlers. we'll hear from palestinian and israelis about how the effects of the so-called disengagement is still being felt today. >> the yemeni president abd rabbuh mansur hadi loyalists have made gains on houthi rebels in the city taiz. loyalists say they control shabwa in the south of yemen which means that they exercise control over five provinces in the country. >> taking control. pro government fighters recapture the main security buildings in the main city of taiz. is another victory for president abd rabbuh mansur hadi's fighters. they have been able to defeat houthi rebels and soldiers loyal to former president ali abdullah saleh in several other citizen across yemen in recent days. on saturday they announced that they managed to expel the houthis and their allies from shbwa earlier this week. these fighters, however, are not content. they say that they will continue their fight until they're in full control of yemen. >> we're in constant contact with the other resistence fighters in a

to defend israel.ost: i appreciate your call. there are number of lawmakers in the middle east, and israel, congressional delegation, a bipartisan delegation. headline "lawmakers take a well-timed israel trip paid aipact -- paid for by the terrible arm. 36 republicans are making the trip before congress is set to consider the controversial iran nuclear deal. the trip being paid for by the american israel education foundation, the charitable arm of the american israel public affairs committee -- we are asking about the case being made on both sides. here's to fines, missouri, and darryl on our democrats line. -- in defiance, missouri. caller: good morning. i'm totally for the president is doing negotiating with the iran ians. israel has been screaming for 20 years that iran would have a nuclear weapon and he cannot have a nuclear weapon yet. meanwhile, israel has stock wild hundreds of nuclear weapons. nobody can-- has stockpiled hundreds of nuclear weapons. nobody can inspect their nuclear facilities.

, it means the guardian of israel. sure he has the fate of israel and the security of israel at heart -- liz: of course. >> -- and that he will do the right thing. i'm, you know, i know this is a very difficult moment and a big dilemma for chuck whether to support the president or to support israel. but i think that he realizes too that this is not about politics -- liz: of course. >> this is about, this is an existential problem. it is about the existence of israel and of civilization as we know it. this is not just a danger for israel. and, therefore, i would urge chuck schumer to do what he truly feels is right, and i believe that deep in his heart he believes this is a bad deal and will vote accordingly. liz: and i believe that he will are do exactly what you hoped for him to do, and that is really weigh this. ambassador billerman, thank you very much for joining us. late in tel aviv. we do have some breaking news we need to get to right now. it comes out of mississippi. the breaking news we're following right now,

including the issue of the threat to israel. walking away from this agreement, you need to take responsibility for the consequences of israel whether you are netanyahu or a member of congress, and you have to weigh it carefully. what risks am i willing to take before i make that vote on behalf of our country and our allies like israel? i think it's an extraordinary job you have done and i would like to give you the opportunity to talk about two problems, and you, too secretary, and if we walk away from this agreement what is likely to happen and secretary moniz the 24-day problem, that's not the robust kind of inspection we hoped for. >> i will be quick because i want earnie to get in here. it's not speculation, it's clear. if congress rejects this, iran goes back to its enrichment and the ayatollah will not come back to the table. anybody that makes that judgment has not talked to the intel community. there is no way given his feelings already about the west and his mistrust of us and his reluctance to have engaged in this disc

what carries more weight than the voice of experts in israel is that people of israel find it extremely difficult to trust anything that the iranian regime does, especially after the denial of the holocaust. that there is a negative mind switch towards the irans. >> thank you very much. still to come on this program, the u.n. security council in south sudan's latest. environmentalists with industry and human consumption making the dead sea even deader. >>> and crossing the golden gate bridge to honor their colleague. >> my life revolves around my kids becoming champions. >> i guess i just got tired of losing and then something just snapped. >> you know... concussions, fractured skulls. this is a scary situation. >> find out what happens when the gloves come off. >> go all out, make this a war. >> the highs and lows of kids' competitive sports. >> you can't go home wondering 'did i give it everything'. >> police have arrested four people after the discovery of 71 refugees in a truck in austria, including eight women and four children. >>> 100 have decide and 100 missing from a ship off t

israel has been lacks in against jewish tomorrow. political activists say that israel society is increasingly embracing what he describes as a culture of violence. >> for the government it is so easy to say this is not us, this is different from us. it is easier for them to have someone that is more extreme more racist so they can say we're not racist. >> following the killings the government has suggested it may change some of its policies. >> well, israel has loudly condemned the recent attacks critics say it is little more than a token gesture by israeli leaders who have been largely deemed silent about settler crimes for decades. whatever the case, given the influence of pro stealther and religious parties in this current government despite the rhetoric very little is likely to change. al jazeera. west jerusalem. >> russia has submitted it's bid to the united nations for control of vast territories in the arctic. russia is claiming exclusive economic rights to to 1.2 million square acres of the area. russia said it does see deman

and israel? in israel we have had a political crisis every year since year zero.r been called. that is part of our secret sauce. we know how to transcend risk. buildinghe risk of companies, figuring out how to shoot missiles out of the sky, and it turns out at the relationship has never been stronger. i reject the notion of this people magazine. of politics. if the leaders don't get along, somehow they are in great danger of degrading the ties. it is not true. investment is at an all-time high. ,uman relationships are great and what we are seeing is simply dozens of large american corporations who until now have not been active in israel. betty: like who? general electric, general motors, and i can't mention others that we are talking to, over 300 r&d centers. they invested over $6 billion. cisco,and facebook and they are all there. we are seeing this growing and not slowing down. betty: speaking of google. a big restructuring just happened there. being that he left been in the long, what didso you think of this restructuring? jon: i think it is great. they will n

i'm asking you to rise above partisan politics as we in israel have risen above it. judge the deal on its substance and substance alone. the more people that know about the deal the more they oppose it. and the more people that know about the deal the more the deal's supporters stifle debate. they do so with false claims and delegitimize criticism. >> the former deputy spokesman participated in the web cast as the executive directors of stan with us. >> pleasure to be here. >> what was the reaction to the prime minister's comments on the web cast. >> the web cast was short and to the point. we had questions and answers. the message was received loud and clear. >> what was the response from the people asking questions. what kind of feeling do you get? >> the understanding, we know what the deal is and we know what is at stake, and the iran deal poses a risk regionally and to israel. >> generally supportive of the prime minister >> yes. >> does he have an uphill battle to convince american jews as a whole. the president lobbied jewish leaders at the white house, and i