ed itas iguccenh ed mit 'oi h tho iger eco righin back. >> the taxization rely a another fo of regulation. when you tax gattyo llple oto o whin aer mf guon aoly. imy goal is not deregulation. it's the minimal regution. and hodoue h plte yv- d i use oaxti v pl as very little economics cost waste -- when you have a regulation, people go aot of y ngoetruln. an e gti ne a fo te eyes of the beholders. they have no saying on that. and it is away from he eef thevrs goi to-[iib etawidwthe waoegtin aefduntax and cigarette, the will of the majority would prevail and we decideow much wa. mithtro wa dgio i et r f guon tss wasteful. byhe way, the fact that on the side we rise revenues. -- wecanreduc tax. shaethetaxoco ifca se th xei lde tt imraf moreuestions . seoul? >> to what extent do you believe that e robminme ua o ud >> thn tht in frw eehstia rs h quied o k t at. it's not my cup of tea. from what i understand moving farred, this is going to be much moren ue caufhw it kstynt t s o. at the moment i don't think this is the biggt prom. if y wan g tu ci iaarlit er u we marginal cost of the product te