that a controversial caltrans program has been cited for allowing pollution to run off in to salmon itat are building a by-pass around a town and the first phase will cost $210 million involve the largest wetlands fill in northern california in at least 20 years. >>> caltrans has missed deadline a after deadline for environmentallial improvements required by state and federal governments. we had planned to bring you a update on this story, but caltrans backed out of the scheduled interview at the last minute and refusing to speak on camera because caltrans claims we are biased. we are not. they want us to submit our questions and allow them to answer in writing only. certainly we do accept written informationing. but journalistic standards demand that we ask the custodians of our tax money face to face questions. no interview has been given and since they will not talk with us, we will focus on caltrans own photos and data to speak for themselves. construction on the by-approximate pass by-pass is in the second year. work stopped for the winter but it's back if swing now. the work is run

one thing that happens in the black community that itats the heck out of me is we make false promisespeople of always. >>> boeingan says the ons has come too far to let it happen. with city officials and private donors that support its mission. >> it takes a heavy, strong back bone to get though the politics of what it took to create the office and sustain and maintain its existence. >> reporter: what does richmond look like tomorrow, five years from now. 15 years from now. eliminated. richmond. >> yes. >> reporter: you say that without doubt. >> you can't get up and do the work we do and not believe it 150%. you can't do it. we wouldn't be where we are today in six years ago we didn't believe we would be here. >> reporter: it's believed other example. >> when i think about the out of the box approach in richmond, they under violence is not evil acts by evil people, but that's a culture of violence descending on a community. the only way to bring it down is to change the culture. >> we seen them, my boy told me who he was, i remembered him. i told them tonight will be the night he die

auo is not specifically for itat. in the tracking example in laredo or elsewhere, that's ampe pretty straight forward. that's what auo is designed to y do. but in the auo construct when you have 85 1/2 hours, hit thatf threshold, we're going to pay you more for the extra hours or beyond 85 1/2.r our that's what flsa compensation in the law allows for. it would be more expensive from that point going forward.j. it's not just the 25%. ours t it gets you up to 25%. and once you get beyond that 85 1/2 hours, then you're getting closer to a time-and-a-half model versus what's contemplated in the legislation which is straight pay for the first ten c hours.you ta >> mr. miles, mr. hamrick, can h you add or take away to this, please? >> so i think the only thing wei would want to add to the conversation is a fourth and aoh fifth example.fth ex it's the instructor at the training facility and the paralegal in san diego. and i think mr. judd makes really good arguments that fromt a recruitment and retention ro standpoint, maybe

home, itat you bring is got to come from one place. -- they say that is not right. that is what is happening in government. we are bringing it down to saying let's look at everything. host: because of sequestration got put into place, the approach that paul ryan took. where do you go from there? guest: what do you mean, where do you go from there? host: as far as cost to the budget -- guest: many times we say let's just cut x amount from the top. that is not a good approach either. simply say that because of a process that is not working, especially over the , that is not a good way to make decisions. when they make crisis decisions they typically make the best decision they can at that point but then they look back and say here was another option. let's go to regular order and say that stick as best we can -- you will never take politics out of everything -- let's look at ineffective and wasteful spending, and that as to what the budgetary process is already .oing it is not an easy choice for presidents on the hill but it is something -- for representatives on the