in practice, the total theoretical matter of 155,000 never really gets achieved unless the itc is raised and there is more contributions because you will always have friends and family from out of town or other contributions that are not natural. some of the other proposals that were looked at in november and december had a line for the type of funds and not subject to match. >> i think we understand that it would be only matching funds. >> if you're going to 1.75 on the mayoral race, what amount is the public fund cap that is now 1.225? that is important for you to make clear. i have not done the math. >> i think it goes to 1.075, but again, i would leave it to the staff to make the corresponding reduction based on the motion. >> they will figure it out, i am told. >> demotion was seconded, justice of the record is clear. all in favor? opposed? it passes the post. thank you for all of you that came. and we thank the staff and supervisors and all of those that participated. this was a helpful process that we engaged in pretty quickly and godspeed. the next item on the agenda is the budge

new golo anti-itc lotion give nefastlo lasting relief. got an itch? gold bond lotion.ix foalmost every itch. behind theheel there is no such thing as a small distraction. a public service reminder from the american academy of orthopaedic surgeons. visit decidetodrive.g.

senator wyden, the difference there seems to be you're using the itc, and senator smith and -- i'm sorry, representative smith and senator leahy's bills would use the courts. what is the problem with using the courts? >> guest: first of all, the single biggest deference between the -- difference between the two bills, both of them acknowledge you ought to go after the bad actors engaging in copyright infringement, our approach does not involve censorship, and it doesn't involve dismantling the domain name system. we believe that so much of the growth in this country and our ability to innovate, social media sites and the ability for folks to communicate depends on the architecture of the internet being preserved and strengthened. that's what it's going to take to deal with these cyber threats, and that's why the national security community is so concerned about the pipa bill and the sopa bill. and that's the single biggest difference. yes, we do think that there's fundamentally a question of international commerce rather than narrow, legalistic, you know, issues that ought to be brought

that, yoknow, we have got them where we want them to be,you make a good point that the regime feels itc is threatened, that this is an existential that to is regime, and so it isoing to ght back, and, you know, i @ hope the administration has thought dof suddenly you were in a ch more serious crisis next we@ek, a nth from now, whenever. >> rose: vali you were part of thadministration working with former ambassador horolb, the laga ambassador richard horook. do you believe there is a lack of an assessment of the damage gaeyre doing to iran with the economic sanctions and what it mit prode in terms of a reaction from them whi mprht include doing something in the strait of rmuz? >> well, i think th underand that they are doing a lot of1 damage to the iranian economyre and that is intentional as dav said, they want to put pain on iraq, i thin wha they might be 1undereimating is that there iranians may n react ithe way that the sanctions are designed to do. secoly the sanctions and particullynon elecon year are designed to alor dealing with the destic pressure on the president to be tough on

senator wyden, the difference there seems to be your using the itc and senator smith, i'm sorry, representatives smith and senator leahy's bills would use the courts. what is a problem with using the courts? >> guest: first of all the single biggest difference between the two bills, both of them acknowledge that you are to go after the bad actors in copyright infringement. our approach, the open bill, does not involve censorship and it doesn't involve dismantling the domain name. we believe that so much of the growth in this country and our ability to innovate, social media types and the ability for oaks to communicate depends on the architecture of the internet being preserved and strengthened. that is what it is going to take to deal with cyberthreats and that is why the national security community is so concerned about the pipa bill and the sopa will and that is the single biggest difference. yes we do think this is fundamentally a question of international commerce rather than narrow, legalistic issues that ought to be brought up in the judicial system but the single biggest difference is we

right now, the itc is catching far more that's getting through. on the internet we believe we can dry up 90-95 percent of all the money. that saves 90-95 percent of the money being lost by rupert murdoch, but all of the people who have such an investment in content. megyn: well, there's a lot of concerns to balance. >> absolutely. megyn: but do you have freedom of speech on the other end. congressman, got to run, thank you for being here, all the best to you sir. >> thank you very much. megyn: you shouldn't buy those, because they're not -- it's not right! fell off the back of a truck just going to leave it at that. >>> coming up, some new punches being thrown in a fight between the white house and former speaker of the house. newt gingrich accusing president obama of being the country's greatest food stamp president, the president's spokesperson calling that crazy. we'll debate it fair and balanced. >> how would you like to stay young and beautiful for decades? a possibility on a real life fountain of youth. after your dishcloth? bounty extra sof

look at another bill out there, open bill, which really goes after those websites yefrs through the itc go before for both parties can have their side listened to and strangle it is money that goes to them like we did wikileaks, that's the way to begin to think about this. >> i want to give you a chance to respond to that. we are going to take one break and come back. [ coughs ] what is this shorty? uh, tissues sir, i'm sick. you don't cough, you don't show defeat. give me your war face! raaah! [ male announcer ] halls. a pep talk in every drop. one chance to hunt down the right insurance at the right price. the "name your price" tool, only from progressive. ready, aim, save! grrr! ooh, i forgot my phone! the "name your price" tool. now available on your phone. get a free quote today. older americans relatively speaking are doing okay. even in these hard times. that's because of social security. which is not a ponzi scheme. it is not bankrupting us. it is not an outrage. it is working. >>> all right. we are back with richard cotton from nbc universal. i want you to respond to what alexi

the world today, the thing that we should be talking about most, the merger of globalization and the itcrevolution which is changing everything. of will talk drug that in detail because this huge work force and education challenge. the of the challenges we face here, you're very familiar, debt and deficit. that nexus of issues of entitlement and how we manage for the next generation, and the third -- of zurich, the fourth challenge is energy in climate, how we power the future of an american middle-class and rising global middle-class is without tipping this world into disruptive minor change. so those of the four big challenges. and we look at the world, how we manage debt and deficit and how we manage our energy needs in a world of rising middle-class. let's go back to the merger of globalization and nike, which i believe is the biggest thing happening in the world today. if we were not in a sub prime crisis or post sub prime crisis, if we were not in a 9/11 error, it would be all we would be talking about. easily what has happened is in the last decade we have gone from the connected

the difference there is that you are using the itc. senator -- representative smith will use the courts. what is the problem with using the court? >> the single biggest difference between the two bills -- both of them acknowledge that bad actors were engaging in a copyright infringement. our approach does not involve a center set and it does not involve dismantling the domain name system. we believe that so much of the growth in this country and our ability to innovate with social media sites and the ability for folks to communicate depends on the architecture of the internet being preserved and strengthened. that is what it will take to deal with the cyber threats. that is why the national security committee is so concerned about these bills. that is the single biggest difference. yes, we do think there is fundamentally a question of international commerce rather than narrow legalistic issues that ought to be brought up in the judicial system. the single biggest difference is we do not dismantle, do not undo the fundamental the an f s