. >> iteal 8 is a resolution to authorize the tax collector to [inaudible] real property at public auction >> this resolution is adopted. >> item 9 the resolution to [inaudible] transmission project. >> supervisor avlose >> thank you, we had a discussion about this item in the budget finance committee and there were a lot of questions i have consistent with the [inaudible] yard going to the proceeds [inaudible] public housing and the other part acquired by a private developer. we want to put conditions on that [inaudible] i have language around those conditions. there was also a major part of the resolution that discussed a pg and e swich yard adjacent to the property and using infrastructure district funds to pay for a screen that goes around the switch yard or cover the switch yard which prevents sound from emanating the new neighborhood. i don't think it makes sense to put support for financing for switch yard. pg and e should pay for that because it a pg and e property there. [inaudible] suggesting i need people to cover the screen around the switch yard and one other amendment is call

our passion toake iteal. ♪ john: ladi and gentleman this woman who died 100 years ago has come back toerance union helped to bring alcohol prohibition she would call drinker's names and march in the bar with her hatchet. people would fear her. six-foot tall and 180 pounds even the men ran from her. now her obituary says she died years ago but i say she lives on in the bo of bill reilly. aughter] i say this because you say things like this. >> is america going to pot? it is hard to make a living. you will be a terrible citizen. john: pot. texting. video games. thee'd make for terrible citizens? >> number one if you do it beyond recreation. i don't like pot but i don't care what kind of games or tweet this but if it tas a pro-life that is what it takes up their mind with these urchins and it will hurt you. john: you were the curmudgeon crusade. john: epidemic that leads to a weaker america? >> absolutely. if you devote your life to the internet as so many are, you are not learning about the world, a personal injury action but tweeting and texting your life away. it is not a challenge. i

deal -- iteal big was a significant penetration." >> that is why over the past few months multiple updates to staffers on the committee. how do we learn from this and work to make sure it does not happen again. i conducted a response to that. it was much broader than to come back and say they are not there anymore. i wanted to use it as an opportunity to drive change. we put a longer-term effort in place then if i had just sent i want to remove them. i wanted to do more than that. >> the damage done? the interview said "significant." >> i would not say significant, but of concern. they did not engage in disruptive behavior. my concern was what if they had decided that was their intent? >> i thank you. problem here, from the standpoint of those of us who feel that our ability to behavior of possible attackers of the united states of america is vital. some reallyhas done significant damage. s -- 57% ofpoll americans branded snowden as a whistleblower. 37% called him a traitor. ofox news poll found 68% americans were glad to know about the nsa program snowden revealed. thosesurvey found disap

is for iteally want to be about cleaner water. this, it'sall of good to know which ones they are supporting but being careful before adding new requirements to make sure that data are going to be useful to people making decisions and not to make sure i have my dollars for my permit row gram when in fact you might want to shift it to the enforcement program. really not creating a system that reinforces turf and the silos but focuses on the outcomes. i would urge and thinking about the next step in terms of how to improve the proposed language, bob kaplan and robert porter, two harvard professors are doing some really interesting work on patient focused accounting and cost tracking and they are finding it is reducing cost and improving cycle times. there may be some lessons for the federal government and what they are doing there. before we take the next step and add a new set of reporting requirements, i would think about what are we trying to accomplish with those reporting requirements. one other thing that's worth considering is

deal -- iteal big was a significant penetration." >> that is why over the past few months multiple updates to staffers on the committee. how do we learn from this and work to make sure it does not happen again. i conducted a response to that. it was much broader than to come back and say they are not there anymore. i wanted to use it as an opportunity to drive change. we put a longer-term effort in place then if i had just sent i want to remove them. i wanted to do more than that. >> the damage done? the interview said "significant." >> i would not say significant, but of concern. they did not engage in disruptive behavior. my concern was what if they had decided that was their intent? >> i thank you. problem here, from the standpoint of those of us who feel that our ability to behavior of possible attackers of the united states of america is vital. some reallyhas done significant damage. s -- 57% ofpoll americans branded snowden as a whistleblower. 37% called him a traitor. ofox news poll found 68% americans were glad to know about the nsa program snowden revealed. thosesurvey found disap