i ask what is in the itel, but he only wheezes, you know, i know the names of many of his friends, ibegan to dial, called , called, and then his friend. kolya is sausage. say that some non-people beat my styop, i immediately called an ambulance. boy know i have snapshot. or rather, i didn’t bring it from me. he's in business. so there it is clearly visible that the ribs are broken, what kind of doctor saw this. let 's study the picture. i assumed a broken rib, scheduled the patient for an examination the next day. i made a tight, fixing bandage. there will be more questions. to the witness. no, there are no questions. you can take a break until tomorrow until 11:00 we will go welcome to the extraordinary finale on sunday 17:30 on the channel, russia family sunday at 11:50 on the channel russia in our program we will sing and remember our favorite songs native village. you know this return to childhood. go. evening show andrey malakhov saturday 18:00 on the channel, russia well, if i lose i invite you to the coast of france there are lobsters to imagine what awaits me. if i lose, if y

itel as she has often counseleds the reliance on the wisdom of those who came before us, confidence inhe foundation of our republic. in his face in her fundamental ideals low work to carry forward her mission to make the dreams of today the reality of tomorrow. and forge a better future for our children and for generations to come. they determination steadfast belief is a better ideal of the american people and majesty of the american democracy is perhaps nancy's greatest legacy. our sacred responsibility as members of this body is subscribed unwaveringly is nancy put it best to reach for the more perfect union. the m glorious horizon she is te most effective speaker in the history of the united states. [applause]te how fortunate we all are that nancy never lost sight of the horizon and how fortunate we are to call her colleagues and friends, thank you. [applause] >> ladies and gentlemen please rights or presentations of the colors of the united states, the singing of our national anthem and the coloring of the colors. [background noises] [background noises] present arms. ♪ oh say can

hill: is it jerry itell, brian goldblatt. mr. ray: no. can i provide that to you. mr. hill: thank you. the second auditing firm are a manino, you are familiar with them that's part after hropbdown-based firm? mr. ray: correct. mr. hill: do you feel the same way about their performance based on the books and records you have seen they also were inadequate in serving as an auditor firm? mr. ray: i don't want to disparage that firm. we do have to look through the books and records and look at the audits themselves and see how comprehensive they were. see if the audit would have picked up anything that we see. and certainly we are going to look at the related party disclosures in those audits. whether there are any footnotes or exceptions. we need to go back and look at all those audits from a look back perspective to determine what maybe could have been done that wasn't. mr. hill: you anticipate the united states being a creditor in these proceedings, either for tax purposes? mr. ray: premature to tefplt we are certainly looking at that ourselves. to the extent we find an

itell you folks when we get ard the kaiser is going to move by force. we sure have some hard-boiled guys in this company. i am afraid i'll be somewhat hard boiled myself before i get back. we have a bunch of sergeants and every man in the company would stick to them until the last. >> now, we have learned a little bit about the propaganda, how the british began to refer to the germans as the hands. this letter that we will look at next shows how the propaganda efforts of the american government reached even rural south dakota, so here is an american poster, an american soldier, halt the junta's. remember the germans are genetically s, was the message. now, s hi sister, anna. she 18 or 19. letters in the collection. she writes, i mentioned in my letteryesterday that ari was going to take me to see over thetop at madison. we have been to seea movie and movies were brand-new. so they hada huge impact on people. had never gone to a eater and seenmoving es oa screen. we went. -- and such a show. i not take 1 million for the two-hour stand there. i thought th

. >> guest: there is a very complicated tale that itel and dreamland. family and they are and anoutside responsibility for wht went on. there's a lot of roots to this story. there's americans wanting easy quick fixes to what a lot of times is rooted in our unwillingness to get in shape and stop smoking and stop drinking and on and on. it's wellness, our own personal response abilityal for wellness. as a culture we point back on that and this is a lot ofa corporate economic interest about you see in the drug companies. every company that makes these pills was a part of this mix. there is numerous companies. oxycontin the role is outside because first of all that is a tin' company. that is a tiny company. the importance to the story as they were part of a massive push in pharmaceutical sales in the mid-90s to the 2,000 as they were the only company that was a part of this hiring huge numbers of salesman to go out there and badger the doctors until they buy your stuff but they were the only company that sold a narcotic as risk-free almost as an over-the-co

we think the lower courts are misunderstanding this courts president as iteles to our constitutional structure. >> i would have thought you would have a little more concerned about an opinion of ours that is four monthsld it is not even out of the cradle yet and you are throwing unr the bus. kind of makes the analogies there. >> we are not suggeinthat opinion should be thrown under the bus. we are briinthose issues with multiple mistakes we out the district court had made. this is a jurisdictional principle and i don't think it would prevent the court here from recognizing the kind of theories of state standing the states are pressing and e lower courts are pressing our removing every possible restriction in the space or that is incompatible with the constitu structure and the separation of powers. >> let me ask you about another case. is it the position of the noted states the states lacked stding in the case from two years ago because they are expected additional health care spenngas an indirect injury? >> i cannot recall whether the government made standing arguments in that case.