item? (roll call). >> there are ten ay session. es. >> this is ordinance has passed. >> item three is an ordinance to allow arts activities and a principallably permitted use to. consciously permit nighttime entertainment uses within the rcd in historic buildings and buildings that contribute to historic district. the st. joseph's church to exempt nighttime entertainment from a 200-foot buffer requirement and to require a preservation rehabilitation and maintenance plan for uses within the fullsome street naked neighd transit and to make the appropriate finding. >> this ordinance passed unanimously. madam clerk, call the next item. >> to amend the planning code and tax regulations code to authorize the addition of a dwelling unit in new construction to clarify the approval process and create an expedited board of appeal's process for certain adus to make the appropriate findings. >> same house, same call? this ordinance has passed unanimously. madam clerk, please call the next item. >> item

item? public comments? a discussion item only, ok. that concludes that item. before we move on, under item 15, the ci's report, was it meant this item regarding new enterprise should have been on the calendar? >> they were added to the closures after the board materials were released. >> the director was notified by ashley duneen that it's that time of year and time for the distribution of the performance evaluation service. ashley indicated she'll be emails services directly to each board member this friday, the 14th and that under the board policy, the retirement board needs to get their survey responses back to ashley by the end of this month. , so june 30th. i also have some good news related to onech our commissioners. commissioner carmen shoe delivered a healthy baby a week ago tuesday. the latest report from her office is that mother and daughter, kaylee, are at home bonding and resting. >> maybe you can get that to us in email to respond with a card or something. >> sure, darlene ca

next item, please. >> item four is general public comment. members of the public may address the commission on matters within the commission's jurisdiction and are not on the agenda today. mr. -- where are you? there you are. >> commissioners, today i want to talk about career jobs. whenever we come over here, and presentations are made, you have to be very careful that those presentations are focused. not to long ago, we had some presentations about the water system improvement projects, the tail end of that. but we began by saying the sewer system improvement project -- i want to make it very clear. no other district or city where they have a task force on a huge project like the sewer system improvement project, that started out at $6 billion, and now it is $12 billion, and you had a task force that made some very stellar recommendations. as soon a task force had done the job, they got a commendation , and that was the end of the story. now we have the community benefit, some $600 million, and we have two people kind of in charge of that m

items. you just call it all each item individually for public comment or you can do a lump sum public comment of up to 15 minutes per person since there were five items. >> i was trying to be expedient. >> don't you want to discuss the general concept of the three scenarios? >> certainly. if there are questions i would be happy to answer those about the whole process, which is a challenging process. >> so let's address that first. >> at the last meeting, i had raised two issues with the analysis. one was the difference between the wsa planning and the one we used for our system. it's been corrected in the revised document and the other was to make clear i what the treatment was of these individual projects that we weren't coming up with a mechanism that was unique to these four or five projects that it was within a structure of class where they would be treated he cannily within their class. those changes have been made as well. >> that's correct. >> so, i'm satisfied that both of the issues

the item is passed. next item please, mr. quintanilla. >> item #. allocate approximately $1.8 million in prop k sales tax funds with conditions for four requests and appropriate $100,000 for prop k funds. >> the floor. >> good morning, commissions. anna la fort, deputy director for policy and programming at the transportation authority. before i begin, i just wanted to clarify a statement that was made by the representative from the citizens' advisory committee about the two bart allocation requests. just wanted to clarify that the high percentage was for construction management or soft costs, costs that are related to the oversight that is done of the work that is performed. and so it wasn't a percent of an increase in a cost. it was actually a cost that is relative to a construction contract. what we typically see in san francisco, the 15% to 30% of construction management costs as a percent of the construction cost estimate for the contract. and in this case, we saw ranges of between 50% and 60%. just wanted to clarify we have received informatio

items. through the chair, if i could reintroduce this amendment. >> this is an amendment to the resolution, it is the whereas that starts, i think it is -- i can't really toggle here, it is on your resolution, and begins with, on march 26, 2019, i believe it is the third resolution from the bottom. can you help me? >> second from the bottom. >> second from the bottom. >> i will read that amendment. it is not that different. on march 26th, 2019 by resolution 190057, which is the resolution be passed on that date, this commission endorse the continued participation in the voluntary agreement negotiation process and stated its intent that the terms of any final voluntary agreement would improve the health of the fisheries and maintain the reliability of its water supply including a maintenance of its level of service of no more than 20% systemwide rationing and. >> i have a question about that. >> it is pretty much consistent with the resolution that we referenced so we pulled out that language

perhaps we will take public comment on this item. is there any public comment on this item? then come on up and i'll tell you about some things about public comments. this goes for everybody. speakers will have 2 minutes. we ask that you state your first and last name and speak directly into the microphone. if you prepared a written statement, you can leave it with the committee clerk. no applause or booing is permitted. speakers are encourage to avoid repetition of previous statements. go ahead. >> good afternoon, my name is tim, i'm a union representative with the united commercial workers located here in san francisco. we're a labor union that represents 4,000 members in the food and drug industry. we are in opposition to the issuance of a liquor license at 888 tennessee street to amazon prime now. they have a history of mistreatment of their workers and they destroy small businesses around the nation. if a license is granted, it would destroy whatever small businesses are left and the character and vibrancy of this city. it will also affect the employees that we represen

[agenda item read] [agenda item read] [agenda item read] [agenda item read]. >> chair fewer: thank you very much. could we have a b.l.a. report, please. >> dan gonchar with budget and legislative analyst. item 7 is an ordinance authorizing the participation of one or more series to refinance the certificates of participation or cops, issued in 2009. item 8 is an ordinance appropriating $160 million in the cops proceeds, and 176,000 in proceeds to refinance the 2009-a and 2009-b cops issuances. it was approved to construct the new laguna honda hospital as well as the acquisition and installation of certain street improvements. the report recommended refinancing the cops. according to the office of public finance on june 3, 2009 memorandum to the board of supervisors, the city expected to issue approximately $148 million in refunding cops and reappropriating reserve funds to reappropriate $131 million of outstanding 2009-a cops, and $39 million of outstanding 2009-b cops. according to the office of public finance, the estimated net present value of savings from refunding the 2009-a and b

[agenda item read] [agenda item read] [agenda it [agenda item read]. >> clerk: further, commissioners, under your regular calendar, the project sponsor just advised me that they are requested items 13 a and b at 95 hawthorne street shadow findings and downtown authorization to be continued. they are requested july 25. that hearing date is closed on your calendar, but entirely up to you what date you continue this matter to. >> is there any members of the public that wish to comment? mr. reuben? >> yes, commissioners. i'm jim reuben, reuben, junius, and rose. you received a letter the other day from john elberling. he's here, and you can talk to him, as well. we ask for july 25 because we think 30 days is enough to get our issues resolved, on our way to get being our issues resolved -- getting our issues resolved, or can't. reuben, junius, and rose removed 300 masonic from your calendar that day, so there should be a spot to fill, so we stipulate to that continuance. thank you. >> thank you. a any one else wish to comment on item 13 a and b? >> our client is not available for the augus

item 13 and 15. there's one change in red on the first and second page and the other items, 14, 16 and 17, there's a change on the second page. for clarification and consistency through the documents. with that, i'd be happy to answer any questions about the over all process and about what the analysis shows for us. >> ok, first of all, let's do the over all analysis. questions, comments? what approach do you think we should take? >> so, madam chair, since you already mentioned this is all going to be bundled because of the same metrics that we're asked for at the last meeting to be continued, maybe just for ex speeden see i would make a motion to move all of these, just to move it forward even though there's an indication that some people want to pull something. >> just to clarify, when you call items together, we still provide three minutes public comment for each of the five items. you just call it all each item individually for public comment or you can do a lump sum public comment of up to 15 mi

seeing none, next item. >> item 8, introduction of new items. information item. >> any new items? seeing none, next item. >> item 9, public comment. >> any general public comment? seeing none, public comment is now closed. meeting is adjourned. i you >> hello, i am with the san francisco parks department serious we are featuring some wonderful locations in your and very own backyard. this is your chance to find your heart in san francisco with someone special. we are here at the lovely and historic palace of fine arts, located in the bustling marina district. originally built for the 1950's exposition, the palace is situated along san francisco's waterfront. it is ada accessible and is reached by the 28, 30, and 91 bus lines. with its rotunda, columns, uncut the reflecting waters against the eucalyptus trees, it is one of the most romantic settings for special dates, and memorable proposals. it is also a perfect spot where you can relax with that special someone while listening to the water and fountain in the lagoon. beautiful to view from many locations, and inside is an ideal p

that concludes item 14. >> item 15. discussion item.nepc2019 capital market assumptions. >> we have an update from nepc about the capital allocation. expectations for risk, returns, correlations. they are having what i think are enhancements to the process. >> board members. >> we need to wait. >> the meeting shall resume. executive director will be back hommomentarily. i will turn it over. >> board members. in previous years, nepc has provided capital market assumptions based on broad asset class expected returns risk and correlations. that certainly is very appropriate. it is also appropriate and helpful to take a look at how we are managing our plan because our plan is really quite different in almost every asset clozariltive to the asset class as a whole. they have made modifications that resulted in substantive changes. i will ask anna to introduce the item and we will go through the details. >> when we were reviewing the capital market assumptions and asset allocation with nepc last year we realized that we have large allocation t

madame clerk, can you call items 36 and 37 together? >> item 36 and 37, proposed interim budgets. appropriation ordinance to appropriate all estimated receipts and estimated expenditures for the departments of the city. and item 37 is the proposed interim annual salary ordinance to enumerate positions in the budget for the fiscal years ending june 30, 2020 and 2021. >> president yee: can we take these same house, same call, without objection? these ordinances are finally passed unanimously. please call item 38 and 39. >> two ordinances that adopt and implement the memorandum of understanding between the city and the service employees international union local 1021 and the staff and per diem nurses and item 39 between the city and the teamsters, local 856 supervising registered nurses. both m.o.u.s to be effective july through june 2022. >> president yee: same house same call? without objection, these are passed unanimously. please call the next item. >> item 40 administrative code displaced tenant preference in affordable housing when it's no longer restricted by affordable housin

before we went on recess, did we call the next item yet? >> clerk: item 8. item 8 was referred without recommendation from the rules committee. it's an ordinance to amend the health cord to authorize procedures for the appointment of a conservator for a person with serious mental illness and substance use disorder and to designate the city attorney to institute judicial proceedings to establish housing conservatorship and amending the administrative code to establish the housing conservatorship working group to conduct an evaluation of the housing conservatorship program. >> okay. can we take this same call? >> roll call, mr. president. >> roll call, please. >> clerk: on item, supervisor safia. supervisor stefani? >> aye. >> supervisor walton? >> no. >> supervisor yee? >> aye. >> supervisor brown? >> aye. >> supervisor fewer? >> aye. >> supervisor haney? >> supervisor mandelman? >> aye. >> supervisor mar? >> aye. >> supervisor peskin? >> aye. >> supervisor ronen? >> there are 10 ayes with 1 no with supervisor ronen in the dissent. >> okay. this ordinance is

seeing none, next item. >> item 8, introduction of new items. information item. >> any new items? seeing none, next item. >> item 9, public comment. >> any general public comment? seeing none, public comment is now closed. meeting is adjourned. i you shop and dine in the 49 promotes local businesses and challenges residents to do their shopping and dining within the 49 square miles of san francisco. by supporting local services within our neighborhoods, we help san francisco remain unique, successful, and vibrant. so where will you shop and dine in the 49? >> my name is ray behr. i am the owner of chief plus. it's a destination specialty foods store, and it's also a corner grocery store, as well. we call it cheese plus because there's a lot of additions in addition to cheese here. from fresh flowers, to wine, past a, chocolate, our dining area and espresso bar. you can have a casual meeting if you want to. it's a real community gathering place. what makes little polk unique, i think, first of all, it's a great pedestrian street. there's people out and about all day, meeting this n

as well as item 5 to the chair and item 6 the sponsoring supervisor asked for a one-week continuance. are there department personnel who would like to say anything as to any of these three items, mr. sanchez? >> commissioner: i'm happy to make a continuance for next week. >> commissioner: i was asked to continue on the dhaufl chair but you're welcome to set forth what the submission of the planning commission was wen they -- when they heard the item. >> i'll give you the recommendation and come back next week. >> perfect. >> they interested considered the ordinance and moved to recommend approval with a few modifications the first was to modify the front setback requirement for properties in the rh, r2o districts from 10 to 15 feet and the second modification was for the non-conforming structure and the third was to further study the effects of i am -- imposing the new distance and proposed language regarding the purpose of real yards for green spaces. that concludes my presentation and we may be chatting next week. >> commissioner: thank you, mr. sanchez. so yes, as to item 6, we'll

seeing none, item number 19. >> item 19, opportunity to place items within the board's jurisdiction onfuture agendas, discussion item. >> president breslin: july 11, remember, everyone, we're having a special meeting. and so i hope everyone can attend. with that, if there is no objection, this meeting is adjourned. >> good morning, everyone! how are you all? so, welcome. i'm with the hotel council and i want to welcome you all to our first love our city. it's the second love our city event but it's the first one that is a tourism and hospitality industry have helped organize. so today we have over 700 people here in also waiting out in the neighborhood. [applause] i'm joined by our chair of our board, mr. james lamb who is here with us today. [applause] and this event is hosted by the hotel council of sf travel but it really came together because of a lot of different people working on the event and i want to thank mayor breed and the city of san francisco and her team for partnering with us on this love our city event. so please give a big hand to them! [applause] we also couldn't hav

i'd put you as item 1 on the agenda of june 24, you would be the first item. will not take anything out of order. that's a solemn promise. >> thank you, chair peskin. i know i have small businesses here today and sad and sorry but i don't want you to wait for this hearing and i definitely have to be here so i will agree to have it go on the 24th and we have owd and the city attorney and hope it work out for everyone. yes, thank you. madam clerk can you read item 2 >> clerk: do you want me to call item 4 to dispose of it? >> commissioner: we'll get to that at the end of the agenda. >> clerk: item 2 the hearing of status on parking attendance working in city-ownered garages and the number of existing employees plans to prioritize the safety and well being of customers and playoff or job reductions in the last three years as well as planned reductions in the future and the move to automated system and requesting the san francisco full transportation agency to report. >> commissioner: thank you, madam clerk, supervisor safai i'll turn it over to you. >> thank you,

to get to our 3:00 item. [please stand by] >> this is named the north of market tenderloin benefit district pursuant to the board resolutions we've adopted on april 23rd. the proposed district is approximately 800 identified parcels located on approximately 41 whole or partial blocks. details of the covered area are in the file. at the conclusion of the public hearing, the department of elections will tabulate the ballots and report to the board of supervisors and members of the public may view the ballot tabotabtatabootab tabulation. the public testimony will be as follows. we will hear from all speakers in support and each speaker will have two minutes and we will hear from all speakers in opposition and during the hearing, a property owner who has not voted yet or who wishes to change their vote may speak with the department of election's staff. they are a table just outside at the board chamber and provide you with the affidavit and board plot. the ballot will be counted. before we begin, supervisor haine

you may speak under item 4 and continued again on item 10. when you address your comments to the commission, please address they want -- them to the commission. neither the commission nor staff will respond to any questions during public comment. the commission may ask questions of staff after public comment is closed. last, if the fire alarms activate, you must evacuate the building in an orderly fashion, using any exit. please note that elevators will immediately return to the first floor and are not available for use. if you need assistance out of the building, make your way to the closest area of refuge, directly across the hall in the men's restroom. you will see a speaker box and city hall security will answer and let them know where you're add and they will assist you. now we're on item 2, the president's report. >> thank you. very briefly as a part of a larger trip back he's, i was invited to the new york site of the p.g.a. championship this year. as many of you know, san francisco will be hosting it next year. we were afforded a back

any discussion on this item? can we take it out objection? item passes. thank you very much. >> item 7, discussion item, risk review for sfers total plan, risk adjusted returns and exposure analysis. >> that was a rhetorical question. >> we could do item nine since the liquid credit team is still here. >> is that okay? would you refer to go to nine since you have everyone here? doesn't matter to me. does it matter to you? okay. great. i'm sorry. item neighbor. >> action item, recommendations to terminate the allocation to prima capital advisers commercial real estate debt strategy within the liquid credit portfolio. >> commissioners, this is a recommendation to terminate prima for a very similar reason as earlier. dedicating a part of our portfolio to very liquid assets within credit and unti in the pe credit space and more liquid in what we call liquid space to achieve higher returns. also, prima is not a particularly liquid strategy. it can take months to redeem. i'm going to ask kurt to further introduce the item. >> this is a coul a consequences reduc

madam clerk, items 61 and 62 [agenda item read] [agenda item read]. >> president yee: supervisor peskin? >> supervisor peskin: thank you, president yee. all of you are in receipt of a few nonsubstantial changes which acknowledge that local 102, the international brotherhood of teamsters is added to this resolution. i want to thank the sponsors, and i would like to make a motion to move the amendments that are in the short title, long title, on page 1, line 17, on page 1, line 23, on page 1 and page 2. >> president yee: can we take motion as amended without objection? and can we take this item, madam clerk, same house, same call? then without objection, item passes. >> clerk: item 62 is a resolution to oppose california state assembly bill number 62 authored by assembly man phil ting. >> president yee: okay. supervisor peskin? >> supervisor peskin: thank you, mr. president. colleagues, it is rather rare that a member of a local governing body introduces a resolution that opposes unless amends -- although we did actually oppose senator wiener's sb-50, but i want to proceed very carefully.

clerk, next item, please. >> item number 5. an ordinance in the planning code to allow arts activities as principally permitted use in the residential commercial district, to conditionally permit nighttime uses within the historic buildings and buildings that contribute to a historic district. to exempt nighttime entertainment in the r.c.d. from the 200-foot buffer requirement. and maintenance plan for uses within the full some street neighborhood and making the appropriate finings. -- findings. >> supervisor. >> thank you, chair. i have some amendments that i think the members of the committee have, which have been passed out, which will amend the ordinance to exempt st. joseph's church from the requirement. so nighttime entertainment use will be principally permitted on that property. the amendments are in the title on page 1 and in the text on page 3, lines 8 to 10. page 4 lines 21 to 22. and page 5, lines 23 to 24. thank you, chair peskin, for allowing us to continue this, to resolve this particular issue. and i hope that m

>> aye. >> next line item. >> item 11 is adjournment. action item. >> so moved. >> second. >> all in favor? >> eyes. >> okay. , great. >> we will call the commission to order. i will call the roll. [roll call] >> welcome, everyone. item two is the approval of the may 21st, 2019 minutes. >> you have copies of the minutes from may 21st. are there any edits, corrections that you would like to make? >> so moved. >> second. >> any comments, commissioners? i have not received public comment on that item. all those in favor say aye. >> aye. >> opposed? hearing then, the moments -- the minutes are adopted. >> item three is director's report. >> that afternoon, commissioners you have the director's report for june 4th in front of you. i will just highlight a few items. one key piece is that last friday, london breed unveiled her budget proposal for fiscal year 2019 to 2021, and really focused on important investments and programs to create more housing, prevent homelessness, and transition people into services and housing to clean the city street

next item. >> item 8. [agenda item read] >> vice president stephenson: t. >> commissioners, i have to say this is one of my favorite items of the year that we do. it's where we're very blessed department to have the kind of resources we do through our garbage rate process that allow us to actually give out grants. not only do we pay for our own work. we build capacity and others. this is very much a celebration of that ability to recognize the leadership that is throughout our community and to challenge them, to come up with innovative ways and to have some longer-term continuing support of community members. you'll hear quite diversity of grantees and i want to say a big thank you to the leadership of sean rosen dos mosmoss and alexy who has been working on this for a number of years. i sheparded this process. always improving it, always asking the question, are we getting the word out to enough people, how are we helping people in their grant applications and how do we continue to help organizations be s

go ahead. >> item c. and item e. >> c. and e., those were the ones that mr. borden just spoke on and they have been taken off of consent, and we will need to have a staff presentation on those. commissioners, without -- we need a motion to approve the consent calendar without item five c. and five e. >> so moved. >> seconded. >> moved and seconded. all those in favor? >> now we are going to go to item five c., the lake merced trail and restroom project. >> why do we need a staff presentation? >> we don't have to, but when we pull it off -- >> let's start with a question from the commissioner. >> the question i had, why did we decide to do a prefabricated restroom? >> the restroom is part of a citywide program and one was removed from st. mary's under the replacement of those. there is a new design that is being approved right now through that program, which is managed by public works, freeing up that one from st. mary's allowed the department to place that restroom at a new park, and problems with the existing portable chemical toilet at lake merced is a majo

president, i would like to ask that we sever item 3. >> president yee: okay. we sever item 3. madam clerk, would you please call the roll on items 1, 2, and 4. [roll call] >> president yee: okay. these ordinances are passed on first reading and the resolution is adopted unanimously. madam clerk, please call item 3. >> clerk: item 3 is a proposal to settle the lawsuit involving a challenge to the environmental impact report prepared in support of and in approval of the 2009 housing element of the san francisco general plan. >> president yee: okay. supervisor mar? >> supervisor mar: president yee and colleagues, the president has requested that we send this back to the g.a.o. for a hearing on the advisory committee. >> second. >> president yee: okay. second? without any objection, this motion passes. madam clerk, let's go to the regular agenda. please call item 5. >> clerk: item 5 is an amendment to the administrative code to the procedure on the bei acquisition of surveillance technology. >> president yee: madam clerk, please call the roll again. [roll call] >> clerk: there are

have findings to share on this item? >> the board is asked to approve the first amendment to the existing agreement between h.s.a. and wu yee for early care and education and the current agreement is $7.7 million and this extends it by one year and increase by about $4.1 million through the fiscal year 2019-20 for $11.8 million. and we summarize the terms, financial terms, on table 1, page 13 of our report. because this agreement contains contingencies in the prior two years that were not used we actually do recommend a reduction of $420,870 from the proposed not to exceed $11.8 million to $11.4 million and otherwise we recommend approval as recommended. >> supervisor mar: thank you, miss campbell. i'm sorry, just on your recommendation about the reduction. is that something that we would need to take action on? >> yes, you would need to amend the resolution to send it to the full board with the lower amount. >> supervisor mar: and -- >> i believe that the department can provide you with the amended resolution to submit

item? hearing on, next item, please. >> item nine is a bay area water supply and conservation agency update. >> good afternoon. >> good afternoon, commissioners i am the c.e.o. thank you for having me here today. i'm here to speak briefly about the future dry your water supply for the customers at the san francisco regional water system in alameda, san mateo, in santa clara county whose interest i represent under state law. in 2002, the california legislature enacted aba 1233 that mandated the system be rebuilt to withstand a future large earthquake that could threaten the health, safety, economic well-being of those people, businesses and communities. it also required san francisco to report to the state annually about quote, the progress made during the previous calendar year on securing supplemental sources of water to augment existing supply during dry years , end quote. that means not just looking for supplemental supplies, it means tangible progress in finding and developing them. the