guardian said itjeremy corbyn faces threat of revoke, telegraph system theresa may faces revolt if she of it where we are finding out more and more about what mps do not want. nothing about what they do want, what they could conceivably wa nt want, what they could conceivably want together. here, we are told as many as 20 men wrecking ministers have indicated they are prepared to quit the government so they can support backbench moves to haul a no—deal brexit. you think about everything that is going on today and you get a summary here at the end of this story saying it sounded to me, this is one mp, it sounded to me is that the prime minister has been all things to all people. she was like the sphinx, they say. i suspect that is true. i have been speaking to a lot of tory mps today, who have been in and out of number ten, and what they say is she was actually very collegiate. we felt she was listening but what did she say back to you? they say she did not say anything. so in fact there was a listening exercise. i asked one of them when i pose that and hejust and he just laughed and qu

therefore is their first loyalty when it comes down to itjeremy corbyn and his calculations that areous tensions in the labour party. the daily telegraph looks at the conservatives and its headline isa mirror the conservatives and its headline is a mirror image of the guardian, which says corbyn faces threat of riewoldt, telegraph, may faces revolt against no deal. well, this is the point —— revolt. here we are again another story telling us what mps are against. and the truth is, this is as many as 20 meg ranking ministers indicating they are prepared to quit the government so they can support backbench moves to support a no—deal brexit. you scream, certain of us want to scream at both sides of this debate, because when brexit, brexiteers said, yes, we won, we got this decisive victory, 52—48, you can decide if its decisive not, we got votes people means , , , peoplevoted means , , , and a nd vote now, somehow — your editor said feel edi may aid feel edi may aid is feel edi may aid - is trying for theresa maythat'she is'trying somehow rewrite the laws of to somehow rewrite the laws

brexit supporters are other don't —— adamant that itjeremy corbyn was a backbencher, he would be advocatingtter which party was in government. they think is a brexit supporters heart. his team says it is nonsense it's clear he doesn't share the same love for the eu that many other labor party members and mps do. he also has particular concerns around state aid and the radical socialist agenda that he would like but there is a recognition that the labor party needs to pick up seats in the next general election to get into power. u nless general election to get into power. unless you can really win over, you can't be seen as being a remain supportive. that's gone to the telegraph. david davis is theresa may should delay the brexit vote. does that make sense? you don't want to lose the vote, maybe she should, but she is already delayed it wants. it would go down very badly. they organised a confidence vote against. over a third of her mps voted against her. they can't do that against her. they can't do that again but there are things other mp5 could do anything if she were to try and delay it

where expecting that to take place next week and itjeremy corbyn wa nted place next week and itjeremy little, too late. reality is, mr speaker, there is no majority in this house to support no deal. why went to the government to face to this truth and stop wasting our time and money. the prime minister should be here updating mps on what progress she has achieved, if any. instead, updating mps on what progress she has achieved, ifany. instead, she's continuing her approach from before christmas of ducking scrutiny and dodging accountability. we will hold this government to account for their incompetence. mr speaker, when the debate begins on wednesday, the government will be clear with the house what has been achieved since the vote was deferred last year. as isaid on the vote was deferred last year. as i said on the 4th of december, the deal will enable us to deliver a fair, skills houghton based immigration system, control over our fisheries and agricultural policies. unlike the snp, who want to remain in the european approach. our own trade policy and an ending to sending vast sums

be seen with these dorks because it jeremy really remains to be seen with these dorks because itjeremy corbynit clear it is a red line and let she falls, and the anyway she would would be is ishii exhausts all of the options in her own party and she has to reach across, that is the soft brexit she can hold over the erg and other benches, then it will not be much of a starter because she is going for party first. jessica, 13th, 14th of february, a meaningful vote two, the potential we are told for mps to vote again in a firm away to rule out the possibility of no deal. how'd you think that will play out? in fact, theresa may has committed to doing anything at all by the 13th or 1ath, only that it she hasn't got a deal from the by the 13th or 1ath, only that it she hasn't got a dealfrom the eu, she hasn't got a dealfrom the eu, she will give another statement and put another motion that can be amendable by that date, so we may see exactly the same thing that we saw play out last night play out again in slightly different versions in two weeks. i think we are all looking forward to spending vale