and one thing i'll say is e of the grtest jobs you can have in the world ito be a foreign correspondent. and 's something i got do for many years for a traditionanews orgazation, and i'm very ankful for that opportunity. we at global post feelike we are about the next generion of foreign reporng. >> ann, when you think abo that impact that y can have with yr camera--and you know becau when you come ck, people say they've seen it.nd you hear what charles is saying and you do your own--you're otwitter and every place l the time. wh about that impact? where is this taking us? >> oh, i think t future is extremely exciting. thdilemma is, how will it ok? who's going to pay f it? what kind of storiesan be done? here's my thinking. my thinki is that the united states has haa woeful--i mean, withll due respect--history in foreign work, reporting. even before thnewspapers started to havtrouble, even befo the networks had trouble, we were a ve myopic, self-focused country, d we still really large are, thinking aboutmostly concerned abouwhat's happening inside of america. and i think at especially

. >> charlie: he would talk ito --e wanted to hear what he had toay. >> do that.ten as far as the sound andhat's said on "60 nutes," mike wallace and i he hadhe same conversation for 24 year r 24 ears, mike has de a narration atnd of which he inriably said to me, "ok, kid, how was it?" and for 24 years i have said "i will give u an "a." you nt to do it again and s if you can get an a-plus? wh iget in the control room, i know what bradle looks like i know what lesley looks like. >> charlie: you want to hear the track. >> sometimes i listeand i whip my head u and i s "waia minute, that infltion wrong" or "that's wdy" or "tre is a better word that we can use there" and i edit with my rs. i don't editith my eye. ppl ve to understand, investing in children is conservative. that isn't radical that isn't liberal -- that makes a sense -- educating s that we're going be able to compete. investing inpeople. for every dolr that wenvest in the g.i. bill after world war ii, we got seven dollars back i rms of the treasu. is that liberal? is that conservative ishat radical? is t

they decided to mount a fair ambitious case tt they hoped wod make it and likely will make ito the supreme court. >> suarez: david bes you might fire. t ted olson is an interestg person to be arguing this. making a conrvative case for y marriage? >> it is a surpristo a lot of peopl in fact inially there was quite a bit ofkepticism out it particularly from the main line gay rightsroups who were wonring about him this kind of jony-come-lately to this ise. think they have been convinced ofis sincerity. it's a risky move. think he , from havinspent someime interviewing him, i would say he very mu lieves in this case. would argue, i think, that rriage... the supreme court has repeatedly helthat maiage is a fundamental right. while they wercertainly not he that it's a fundamental right to marry someo of the same sex, i think he is gog to argue that it's an extension ofhat right which the preme court has repeatedly recognid. >> suarez: you mention risky move. a lot of the gayivil rights organizations thought too. initiay they opposed this effort. didn they? >> they did. they thought it s prematur

. >> sreenivasan: the goal ito make sure 90% of the childrein or nations are immunized. for threcord, the bill and melinda gates foundation ia newsur underwriter. jury in wichita, kansas, has convted an abortion opponent of murder for killing aborti provider last may. the pal deliberated just 37 minutetoday before returning the verdict against scot roed. he admitted gunnindown dr. georgeiller inside a church in wichita last may. he faces a mandatory life sentence. tiller was one othe only doctors in the u. performing late-term abortions. those are some of the day'main stories. i'll be back at thend of the ogram with a preview of what you'll find tonighon the newshour web site. but for now, back to judy. >> woodruff: and sti to come the newshour: the bate over where to hold teorism trials; and the challenge ofeviving iti's econy. >> lehrer: butow, as promised, the analysis of shields an brooks-- syndicated coluist mark shields and "new york times"olumnist david brooks. mark whack did you thi of the obama and e republican shown baltimore. >> i thought it was terrif. i thin

and apparently even sent a cabinet member to talk to the representative of itoe la khomeini to tell - of atoe la khomeini to tell him, we're ready to talk and be friends with you, tell us how you want to proceed he understood not that these people considered themselves as extremist jihaddist enemies of the united states, that they consider the great satan and they needed to destroy it at all costs. the ayatollah khomeini called for basically war against the united states. and in november -- on november 4, 1979, iranian muslims, extremists, stormed the american industry in itaye ran. they took actual more than 52 hostages. they released some for p.r. purposes later, but kept 52 diplomats hostage. now president carter and his administration thought, we can just out-friend them and they'll release them. we'll be nice to them. we know how to do this. we'll be really, really nice and we'll work with them and in fact at one point, president carter said we don't want to do anything that will put these hostages at risk. that was a green light to islamic extremist, jihaddists, around the world

me to be delivering this speech at georgetown because there is no better place than this university itoabout human rights. the president and the administration of the school embodied the university's long tradition of free inquiry and the cause of human rights around the world. i know that he has taught a course on human rights. as well as on the ethics of international development, along with my longtime colleague carol lancaster. i want to commend the faculty who are helping to shape our thinking on human rights, on conflict resolution, on development he and related subjects. it is important to be at this university because the students, the faculty, every single year, ad to the intra-religious dialogue. you give voice to the advocates who are working on the front line of the global human rights movement through the human rights institute here at the law school and other programs. the opportunities that you provide your students to work in the international women's rights clinic is especially close to my heart. all of these efforts reflected the deep commitment that the georgetown adm

i make about $1.5 million a year as bessie ito -- the ceo.ave to say, it is a good job, a chance to be in politics. host: and you were the mayor of dallas? guest: yes, go cowboys. caller: i called to say that you said that you made some mistakes. the problem is, when they got the bonuses, they kept them. remember they said that they would give them back? that is the problem. now when they say they deserve the bonuses, is not right. guest: what you just said did happen a couple of times, but it is more the perception and reality. there are such things called clawbacks. many people involved lost their job, and should have, and many of those businesses went out of business. if you made that many mistakes, then you ought to. we are a group that does not believe in too big to fail. bonuses should be based on long- term performance. if you lost money, you should not receive a bonus. if you received it under false pretenses, then there should be a clawback. host: going back to the fall of the 2008, your view, your organization's view is that some of