itter moments, mueller witch hunt. so we won, we were in the right. you see what is happening. a total fraud. a total fraud. 76-1. 76-1. you look at it. you think that's fair? illegal alien as hate speech. just article after article. here's one. this is the one, this guy, he is the arbiter of what is supposed to go on twitter. a hought and used cnn as guide and fake news. his name is o'rourke and he said mail-in balloting, no fraud, no fraud. really? why don't you look at cases. if we went to mail-in balloting our election would look like a total joke. it would be a total joke. there is such fraud and abuse. and you know about harvesting and harvest the ballots and go to people's houses and say sign here. you can't be there or sick and you go and register and do all sorts of things to get that ballot and good security measures. millions and millions of ballots to anybody that is breathing, anybody in california that is breathing. reporter: mr. president, that is not true. president trump: i'm not finished. here's your man. and he's wrong. and no matter who it is, they will admi

. >> we are following laura on itter.e is earlier saying i find it fascinating that governments around theorld are now considering test, track, treat. i wrote this seven weeks ago. the example was already there for all to see. this is what laura i talking about. seven weeks back she wrote tt, e saving lives. i hssany expe i srtastay next, let' turn to hungry, which has reported00 deaths, fa below the thousands who died in italy, france,he t spain. still far below places with smaller populations. here is nick thorne in budapest. >> early in the pandemic in hungry, doctors realizedts that patiere catching the ronavirus in hospital, so they began emptying the rds. at first, voluntarily. patients were advised to go home immediately. t government measures and the self-discipline of the population kept infection numbers down. next week, theen gover plans to relax some restrictions. t be an enormous task. ppssed so we don't just sit at home and we start toive again? and for a different strategy, a t momentum, a differentenerdi w

already today, we are seeing itter, the u.s.resident wasand claiming male in voteses would ensure a rigged election in november. but that's not true, correct? guest: that is false. there are claims that are in big u.s. perhaps, but -- that are ambiguous, perhaps, but there's no question trump was inventing a falsehood and he was fact checked on manyy -- many public leaders are fact checked constantly by aggressssive fact checking orgrganizations a and e did not respond well to this fact checking brent: effort. brent:what about social media companies? should they be responsible for untruths being distributed on their platforms, particularly in political campaigns? guest: it is very clear that when fact-checks are applied, people respond a across the political spectrum by becoming more accurate. it therefore creates a disincentive for politicians to spread lies and misinformation. socialal media companies can and should issue fact-checks in order to convince peoeople of te truth,h, to let peopople know wt is what,t, to brent: sepa

itter: i think ilya has exactly right. we agree. agreey: but you do not about the disposition of the case. why are you concerned that if the court rules against the government that these bad things could result? ilya and i agree on the principle. it is the particular application is where the dispute comes up. my problem is that i think that the supreme court did not adopt ss test that we think applies. it apply the scope of the program test and that would say we willoup to be accepting these grants and we will only use them to increase access to reproductive health care, and then plan their head could accept that and say, in this grant program we are only theg to increase appreciation for sanctity for life in the womb. i do not think that makes sense in terms of the government. if you're going to have a role that the government cannot take a position on these issues, then it does not make a lot of sense to say it can have that position ,ut then it cannot carry it out cannot contract with other people to do it and consistent with tha