blood pressure and so on, there are some creative syrians on the ground who have figured outcry at ittives to get this aid in. the bravery to cross across the border and go into the area and trying to get people help knowing that at any point assad could drop a bomb or random thugs could harm people, but these are the heros that really make a difference, but at the end of the day the true heros are the syrian people that are there every day, and watching, getting sick and dying out of diseases that they never thought would be fatal to them, and finally the most horrible weapon is starvation, watching your child or mom and dad die in front of you because they don't have a food or medicine, breaking the siege that's the most creative way i have seen syrians on the ground try to get help in. >> talk a little bit about what your connection and commitment to syria has done in the community where you are mayor? i'm guessing that it has to have inspired your constituents? >> absolutely, i -- i receive very positive feedback from all members of the community. they are very supportive whether it's

it's a really -- some of the coverage on this has been deseptember ittive. >> bill kristol, and as pauls out, the report doesn't say employers are cutting jobs. it says people will choose to work less because they're going to choose to get the subsidies instead of working. okay. is that all right? ? killing jobs is a fair characterization or not. >> the give everyone subsidies and no one would have a job and paul would think that's wonderful. no one, would. i thought there was a serious problem with unemployment in this country. it turns out obamacare is contributing to it already and more in the future. obamacare is a wonderful liberal social program. if you like your insurance, you lose it. if you like your doctor are, you lose her. if you like your job, you lose it. it's like a perfect example of liberals big government social engineering. it will be studied for decades in public policy schools as the example of the failure of liberal public policy. unfortunately, it's hurting the country now. we'll have to repeal it as soon as possible. >> paul, it does seem, by the way, about the d

not punitive but rest or ittive and helping it transition and focusing not on the long gain.i think people would say that, you know, the laws are there. it's being developed. that the national resources are plenty that can be developed and paid for moving forward. and others are saying no, we should look at the trusteeship. that, you know, the land might belong to the people but until the government belongs to the people it needs to be sit in the trusteeship. and the government belongs to the people when the trants suggestion is over. there's a permanent constitution. that's when you can start to look at how to use the natural resources. it is set also an influence to bring assistance. i think we're asking the wrong question. we're asking which side are you on. we should be asking who are you scared of. where do you have confidence in being. not where do you sit and who represents you. it's a different conversation. it's a bigger conversation. and i think will help get closer to the what the the solution is. next, i want to focus on the economy a little bit more. 75% of the b