the peoe that got a little finger in e eye when he said he di't support single player plans that iupportthinfrankly we know for example the that hureds of billions of dollars e taken ouof the heah care system anput into profitsand overheads by insurance companies that want to bring in as much as theyan and pay outas little as they can. he made a good argument for why yoneed at the very least a puic option. ifou take a public option out, take it off the table o out of the plan, then there is nothing in the bill that contains costs effectively. and that, think, is a very important thing to keep mind. he made a prty good argume thatou can't pubc option at this point. and that'sgood. but to some degree the speak was a rorschach test for members o coress who wanted to see in it whatever ty thought was the most important thingut if all amerans tuned in even f a moment and said,you know what this doesn't seem like the worst thing in the world, in fact we have to do it if wewant to accomplish the obctives of getting our economy going, it's ultimately goingo be a very good thing. >> rose: some ar

the peoe that got a little finger in e eye when he said he di't support single player plans that iupport. i thinfrankly we know for example the that hureds of billions of dollars e taken ouof the heah care system anput into profitsand overheads by insurance companies that want to bring in as much as theyan and pay outas little as they can. he made a good argument for why yoneed at the very least a puic option. ifou take a public option out, take it off the table o out of the plan, then there is nothing in the bill that contains costs effectively. and that, think, is a very important thing to keep mind. he made a prty good argume thatou can't pubc option at this point. and that'sgood. but to some degree the speak was a rorschach test for members o coress who wanted to see in it whatever ty thought was the most important thingut if all amerans tuned in even f a moment and said,you know what this doesn't seem like the worst thing in the world, in fact we have to do it if wewant to accomplish the obctives of getting our economy going, it's ultimately goingo be a very good thing. >> rose: som

iupport school choice, but that is a failed policy in my view.with that level of participation, more recently, the center on education policy concluded that of the five federal or structuring options could be proven to be better than any of the others. i suggest we broadness to think about the other 66 programs in the know child left behind program we haven't talked about. 66 sarate programs that is going on in school systemst and ask whether they are helping educators succeed or not. a new -- the same question that i will ask a several of the panel members -- whether you work in the school system or a school, are there specific things about no child of behind that you had sn be effective over the past few yearshat we need to make sure we recommend to continue? are there specific things that we should recommend go away? more broadly, are there other new ideas about how we should organize the strategies? think outside the box -- other ways the federal government should use incentives and disincetives that would help to be more successful in creati