ivan alekseevich today does not accept yasno girl. i told you not to go to him. vadim hello .e in the seventh case, i urgently need to get hit. i will answer all your questions . alekseevich unfortunately. today just don't worry about it get it right since then his daughter died. you understand ivan alekseevich hello, i am very important to you. with petr dmitry fedorovich born in 1985 members of the association of lawyers of russia member of the city bar association has a higher education law academy single, acted as a lawyer in real estate and civil family code cases from me, she will give you everything. let's soon after the internship moved to work in the field of criminal law and during the time work successfully completed 80 percent of criminal and civil cases, ideological enemy. we plant it releases. come on under the blow of his further blows ivan alekseevich, the judge of the highest category is boring here, the biography, like that of the saint come on, here is the only human member of the society of hunters in the region. at the same time as professionals. the day a

well, ivan alekseevich's personal file, here are all the documents. of travel sheets did he often travel? of course , this is his job. i traveled around the region checking objects for compliance with sanitary standards. here is the itinerary here all business trips. so from june 5, he was also on a business trip, that's for sure. well , everything is written here from june 4 to june 6, checking the kostomuksha wood processing plant, indeed there was it, you can check everything . well, there was definitely a report on that trip. but if you do not believe the documents, you can call the factory and make sure. thanks daddy. let's go far away is this kostomukshinsky plant, the captain, and 500 kilometers from us. well, therefore, from leningrad , all 900 will be glued together. i have nothing according to our data. he was in leningrad. i didn't come here for diamonds. captain makukha is suspected of several murders, one of them happened on june 5th. it seems that the blood does not clot, hold on tight, i'm now, lord julia, it was in vain that we drove h

conflict be allowed and that it should actually be completed precisely through negotiations, ivan alekseevich how can you comment this is the most obvious just a difference in rhetoric between a barrel that should reflect a common denominator, yes, and what e what olaf-scholz and er, immunoilkron are talking about and if the barrel reflects an american point of view, and not a european point of view, then, is it possible? assume that in the event of an inevitable new crisis in transatlantic relations, in my opinion, europe will still adjust its approach towards russia. in the first part of the program with dmitry simes, you recalled some russian sayings, and there is a lot of russian sayings that are applicable. there is, for example, a saying, that no matter how much you say halva in your mouth will not become sweeter, and so on. in this case, no matter how much you say war, nothing will change, while the europeans and the united states are actually waging war on the territory of ukraine with the armed forces of the lugansk donetsk people's republics, as well as with the russian armed forces

i was also here on the same day in exactly the same way and put a dropper, only before that ivan alekseevich had her before arrival. goodbye. i agreed with the director of the plant that he went to check it, especially recently. for 20 years soul to soul lived some special dear. actually, yes, my legacy is still revolutionary. if you don't mind, i must return the photo, of course, take beautiful ones there. more need, so take care of yourself, good. so the captain needs to check all the business trips of the top for the date of the murders and i need witnesses, they are pieces of paper, i 'll take care of it. what the hell are you doing on tv? yes, she also called my name. you need your diary. you'll get your papers, but only after you make the concentrate, it will work . where can i get blood? it's not my problem ever in my life it worked. he ran away and promised to return before the birth and disappeared. do you even know how much i went through, what happened to me. where diary, where is schulz's diary? russian pig where is the diary? tell me, where is the diary? the russian will soon be

yes, it was an official statement from the state department ivan alekseevich it seems to me that it is to create additional conflict in the current situation. and if really the united states will now aggravate relations with turkey over its planned military operation from syria i don't think erdogan will be more capable of an agreement on expansion in finland , sweden and nato why is the united states doing this? i have, uh, the optimistic version. i'm not sure that it's correct, but there is, e, i usually act as a pessimist, but there is an optimistic one. it consists in the fact that the united states is within the framework of my conception of them. the main task now is not to punish not obediently. well, or rather, they are trying to punish the most important disobedient russia and china and china and all the rest , they are not until their hands reach them. the most important thing is to consolidate their own and those who do not consolidate, they are ready to eject e from their e, which means allied ship, and here i am. it seems to me that there are signs that they want to throw

i have a question for ivan alekseevich. what for the united states?o these same euro-atlantic elites need the euro? why micha makonulo? why fight johnson? yes, why would manfried weber join sweden in finland if, let me say a few words to begin with, i will say about turkey, first of all, a very remarkable statement by the europeans. uh, politicians that they isolate uh nato apparently inside. or rather, it isolates turkey, but, apparently, within nato, that is, some kind of quarantine will be created there for the guilty, where turkey will be placed, in general it would be logical to say that if such a passage is a bad member and behaves so badly, we will exclude it. well , it would be a camp, what is a country a full member of the alliance, we isolate it. this is such a doctrine of limited sovereignty within the alliance . no, to be honest, i have no idea at all how it is possible to isolate a country in an organization where, like, all decisions are made by content people. it is turkey that can veto its own army, the most combat-ready after the us i

well , here i agree with ivan alekseevich in one aspect.e history of nato expansion and the consequences shows that when countries enter an alliance, especially eastern european countries, they have yes and they and they, but they consider it as an indulgence from everything. and now, many experts in the west are practically a consensus point of view that with the entry of sweden into finland, nato will be easier to defend if something happens the baltic countries, and therefore really in this context. they may go for even more provocative behavior than, uh, allowed themselves. eh, i still would not like to, of course, yes, but i am sure that russia will have something to answer. and in principle, this situation, er, which we are discussing, when some nato countries dare to, but oppose. this is what the united states stands for proves what president putin said that the united states has no allies, they a have satellites and imagine scale of the american foreign policy crisis. if now, in the context of the strengthening of the sun-, e, multi

ivan alekseevich, if i may, i would add such a detail, it seems to me that the truma did not retreat from the plan to quickly continue the war with the soviet union. and as you rightly said, because he simply realistically looked at the balance of power and at the power that the soviet union had, but he also probably understood that what the british allies feed him on about the moods inside europe is also not entirely true, because against the backdrop of that victory, the positions of the soviet union in europe were strong not only militarily, but morally, of course, in the broad sense of the word in the political sense, people looked and uh and wondered. naturally, the germans captured almost all of europe. they were told that the soviet system was backward, that this was a dead-end version of history, that the soviet union was nothing of itself , that at that time there was no expression of the empire of evil, but the soviet one was painted in very gloomy, but rather prison peoples colors and so on and so forth. and if suddenly the soviet union liberates almost all of europe, and

ivan alekseevich, but not a locust, but susloparov, uh, general susloparov, who, uh, was placed in a; he had no instructions from moscow; naturally, he sent an urgent dispatch to the kremlin, but there was no answer. the night was coming. the act of surrender was to be signed on the night of the seventh, and it was signed at 2:30. general susloparov had to make the difficult decision to sign or not to sign roman acts of surrender without stalin's decision well, from the slopars, too, was not a parquet general. he took a winter one in october of the seventeenth year. e, then he was a military attaché in france, coordinated the activities of our intelligence in western europe, was a representative at esenhower's headquarters.

and when is there still to get rid of russian energy carriers, and god alone knows ivan alekseevich then union has been depleted. i want it very much share your optimism about a move in the position of the united states or, uh, or the european union move, just the officially proclaimed oil bartender will not. ah, indeed. this lady is amazing. maybe this is what in american is called changing shoes in the air, but right now it changes its position, because, well, just a few weeks ago. she said the unity of the european union, no one will be against it, now she is already saying that, well, it seems, it’s not necessary, but still, uh, for me in her the key statement is not that she says we will not give up oil. and what she confirms, but the bet is to deceive and rob russia. she just says that right now we cannot deceive you completely, therefore, uh, some. tomorrow. we will rob you when we can. this can be understood optimistically, as it seems to me, try to understand this, what it means, that they continue their rhetoric, but refuse their actions, and then we’ll see what will be, but i

and ivan alekseevich well, like the wind in washington is gradually changing? how do you think?e really want to hope that everyone will come to their senses and take some more realistic positions, but so far i don’t see that the wind in washington is really changing. however, the merchant is well aware of his position. he occupied it, approximately the same position a month ago and a year ago, and this position does not change in a recent poll that conducted the same form of fs. he unequivocally spoke out that the expansion of nato was clearly a mistake who stood in such positions, they do not seem to leave these positions. eh, they are given, to one degree or another, the opportunity to speak out, but in order to change certain general sentiments that shape the current policy. i don't see this yet. and i'm afraid that there won't be any awakening and sobering and so on in washington. washington made a bet on its line, the only question is, what methods will it use, uh, will it be carried out, and from my point of view, washington now, uh, has problems with this, because they un

i have questions ivan alekseevich yes, and given that europe is not able to follow further, in the directionited states and britain determine, how the united states and great britain will continue to act, how the hawks will continue to act, in my opinion, there are two models. yes, the first model is to act in accordance with the principle that, back in 1914, with regard to the european union, victoria nlond very clearly formulated. that is, act independently. to put it mildly, yes, a and but this will mean a split within the western community with all the reputational costs for the united states and great britain on the other hand, yes, to maintain a common western unity. but then a hawk will have to stop being a hawk. yes, and we will have to somehow focus on the position of the continental western european countries. how will the situation develop in your opinion? i think that you have described the picture very accurately, but still i would not be in a hurry to call what we are now witnessing a split. i would call it uh confusion and wobble. we see that there is really no solidity. uh, t

why did they live live in harmony lived pyotr alekseevich ivan sergeevich was killed yesterday?t can you say 20 years of impeccable service? and here on you so and pancakes. blinov came to us a year and a half ago. they came together with prokhorov. they served together for a long time. at first everything was fine. internship courses work pancakes tumanov got into the crew. well, it's been six months. well, then the guy went bad and began to drink, well, then sergeevich tumanov wrote a report to the authorities, it's clear what pancakes after that and pancakes? he held on for a couple of months, and then all over again, then ivan wrote a second report and blinovo was fired. yeah, but he didn’t threaten, fog, he didn’t try to take revenge. no, i'm not like that i heard. and what about prokhorov and prokhorov prokhorov, as an employee, showed himself only on the good side, tell me, could prokhorov put his accomplices and take the money. he served in the army with a pancake for 2 years, no joke together in hot spots. i already said that tumanov himself let me go to the maternity h

because they want to protect the special benefits that they derive from relations with moscow ivan alekseevichnal interests, but they, in principle, do not support that model of international order that you are promoting the west, namely, global hegemony. the west, after all, the west is trying to protect this particular model in ukraine, but it is not interesting, strangely enough, the martians or mexico are not brazil. do you think i agree with you. here the authors of the article who cited they hold within the united states within the discussion that there is such a point of view that america is acting too selfishly. it does not extend the benefits of its world order to many significant states, and therefore they support america. america is fighting for a supposedly liberal world order, and they do not support it because they do not get enough. profitable, it seems to me that this, of course, is self-deception, this is the self-deception of those who still believe in this liberal world order. in fact, from my point of view, the situation is as follows: small and medium states. and even such

concerns turkish demands before the nato summit, which will be held at the end of june in madrid ivan alekseevichar that erdogan is trying to get the most out of this situation. he realizes that he has the trump card and uses it to gain concessions and from the side of the united states and from the side of, of course, sweden and finland a and indeed i completely. i agree with igor yuryevich, he is seeking not only a change in the position of stockholm and helsinki , which is already not very easy for them, because there we are talking about the extradition of those people who had previously been granted political asylum, moreover, it is talking about, including number of members of parliament e sweden e, the extradition required. uh, turkey, but we are talking about the united states changing its position on turkey, and in fact, by that by doing so, erdogan inflicts colossal reputational damage on the united states shows that within nato, not to mention outside of nato, the united states already has unequivocal hegemony. no. now, will it be the united states, what can it do in the current situat

this is what we are now observing, and ivan alekseevich so , after all, biden did a good thing for ust turned out, as always, he did error. he made a mistake. not naturally, individually, but the entire american system of views. she just stumbled a lot. it happened. this is not the first time. why they underestimated us, the reason is that they know, here the hegelians attribute the phrase that if the reality of e does not correspond to e, then my ideas, then so much the worse for reality. here they are very much mired in their own ideas, and remake the world in accordance with their own ideas. they no longer have the strength to refuse own unfulfilled ideas. they have no will. and here they are, well, it seems to me that the most intelligent people in the united states understood that sooner or later this? everything, it's all going to break. uh, they stumbled in iraq in afghanistan right now on er, russia they stumbled. apparently decisive. she sees the collapse of the us-centric world order. i would pay attention. here's to what's the world uh, the current crisis. uh, he sees two w

we must understand that pan khamatova is not ivan urgant, svetlana alekseevich , shenderovich, or gozmanvil society. these are agents of influence now civil society is being formed. now, when in belarus the word of grigory ozarenka, published in his telegram channel, determines whether there is a public initiative or not. he is behind him there are people behind him there are people who have passed the tests of the 20th year. this is the person who was planned to be assassinated , this is the person who proved his loyalty to his country. and this is what civil society is. when something appears somewhere, uh, for example, we are now having another such disassembly of some kind of nationalism yes, and people react to it and demand to call for an answer, then the state follows the people. but these are all shenderovichs and gosmans. they cannot understand, they still think that the kremlin is giving orders to mikheev that someone is there ? and maybe sergey alexandrovich didn’t mind? i don't know what they are dumas here they are what we are sitting here with you, we were given some kind o

received the name of the first cosmonaut of the planet yuri alekseevich gagarin 780 heroes of the soviet union and russia, of which 43-2 times one ivan nikitichkov. and, of course, all the heads of the academy are famous russian pilots who, as a rule, came from the post of chief of the main staff or commanders, and of course. life flowed. today, this place is probably known to every true aviation lover all over the world, it was on the monino airfield that the central museum of the air force was organized among the many aviation museums of the world, large and small, it occupies a special place. yes, our museum stands apart, because it is one of the largest in the soviet union. it has more than 200 408 aircraft, more than 50 aircraft propellers on display. in total, the exposition is almost 33,000 exhibits. they are located in six halls on two platforms, open and closed. these places have a long aviation history. in 1929, the construction of a military airfield began in the area of ​​monino station. the place was not chosen by chance next to vladimirka passed the famous vladimirsky tract. today, the federal highway m7 volga passes he