first off, thank you for your work on all of this, for highlighting the influence of this guy, ivan ilyin, on putin. what would ilyin make of putin's presidency and his invasion of ukraine? >> well, on the presidency, he would very much approve. ilyin's idea of politics was that a one-party state was too much. there really should be zero parties. there should just be a leader. incidentally, putin had the article which said that sent to everyone in his party so they would know just how important they were. he thought that a state should exist for the leader. there should be for institutional barriers. we see that in russia today with no consultation. the president of russia can send an army out to invade another country. he thought that elections should be purely ritual exercises of support for the leader, which is just what they are in russia today. and if we think about the war, ilyin, as you've already said, had the idea which putin repeats that russia is a kind of all-embracing civilization whose borders are defined only by the will of the leader. ilyin refused to use the word ukraine.