ivan kyrychevsky, military expert of defense express. mr. trying to get you back on our air again, i hope the quality will be better by phone. rockets to the patriots, in plain language. rockets, in simple language, a rocket is made for 23-25 ​​months, i.e they will just give us something already ready, but in relatively small quantities, what they will give us will not be enough. but there is no option not to give, that's what we have to, let's say , count on, to put it briefly. about south korea and its capabilities, mr. ivan, what can they offer us? actually in support of what is called the lethal weapon of the air defense system? well, look, what should be the starting point? we immediately have ambitions for south korea to give us the kei-sam anti-aircraft missile complex, well , they are korean shadows, but which is even somehow similar to the s-400, well, if it didn't sound paradoxical, this developer doesn't have this complex, there is a russian trace, because almazanei also worked on it there, but i think that for a start we will hav

missiles and ammunition for the hymers stinger missiles, we will talk about this further with ivan kyrychevsky. an expert defense express military portal. ivan, good evening, i congratulate you. good evening. let's start with the new aid package that joe biden announced during his meeting today with president zelensky, as i mentioned in france. the package is worth 225 million dollars and will include ammunition for hymers, rockets, stinger, javelins, mortar and artillery shells. how do you rate this package? well, let's say that if there were only missiles to the hauk. because the most important thing, in my opinion, is given there, if we take the situation with a critical one infrastructure, then even there the most important thing is missiles up to 23 havoc complexes, which can shoot down, at least subsonic cruise missiles and rockets, but roughly speaking, if it were only these things, it’s all the same, it’s all the same, it would be a very valuable package, if we talk more in detail, then there was even a strange and specific story that the pentagon decided in this case to lay out even q

main question is what kind of weapons they will be armed with, defense express agency expert ivan kyrychevskyontinues: we are talking about weapons that, in any form, in any format, should strengthen our capabilities in war in in the air, even if they give us in the 16th, well, with the simplest set of airborne weapons, that is , we have missiles in the im10b version, which can be fired from an aircraft at... 50 km from the anasam complex at 20 km, well, there , for example, control of an aerial bomb, well , in fact, this will be quite enough to, firstly, more effectively bomb the russians at the front than it is now, well, and secondly, that even in this, even the most pessimistic, simplified version, f16 on to raise the efficiency of subsonic interception by at least a few percent, i will emphasize subsonic cruise missiles and rockets can, or supersonic cruise missiles and ballistics are not. what in the world cannot be beaten, a more optimistic option is that we will be given not only the old air-to-air missiles 120b, but also new and newer ones there, for example, which are there at all,