to be taken into account by the faction of the european solidarity, who will put i don't see ivan orestivna, please dear colleagues, amendment number 133, the wording proposed by e-e is proposed to be adopted today , it gives the antimonopoly committee really very significant powers, in particular, to conduct an inspection of the service premises of vehicles, to seize, to impose an arrest on objects , documents, various information carriers that can be evidence in the case, the amendment that i propose, and i propose, is not intended to be your amendment. please look carefully, mine now, just a second, colleagues, we'll figure it out, my fedienko tables are partially taken into account, i'll look at the table, but i have the table printed out, and it's 130, just now , then, just a second, let's take a look. look for a second and what is ivan's amendment orestivna about, please turn on the microphone about what i propose to provide by law in what way the antimonopoly committee a can conduct these searches and can have additional powers regarding conducting inspections of service premises of

they will run their noses at you like kittens in your constant lies, thank you, please, when ivan orestivna's pustiansations after that get ready, fade away ivan orest for 5 minutes dear colleagues, i am glad that today we are considering in the second reading a draft law that may finally constitute an independent and clear selection procedure for the selection of judges of the constitutional court, but let's look a little retrospectively at what we are doing, and more than a year ago, we received seven demands from the european commission from the european union , which accompanied the decision on our candidacy, and the verkhovna rada of ukraine loudly declared that we mobilized as much as possible to fulfill them. but what did we do? initially, without considering the draft law on how to appoint judges of the constitutional court, this chamber appointed a member of its political monomajority to the vacant position in constitutional court and only after that she submitted the first draft of the law on changing the e-e approach to the selection of judges of the constitutional court, and in th

thank you very much colleagues dear colleagues signed up from the faction , please klympustion ivan orestivna european solidarity please dear colleagues, it is very good that you have finally come to this hands. i don't know when transparency and accountability hindered anyone, because thanks to transparency, we found out, for example, about series for 400 million uah, one of which was about a steam locomotive, we learned from journalists about eggs for 17 uah to the ministry of defense. and now we should also show an example that transparency - this also applies to the verkhovna rada of ukraine, the cabinet of ministers of ukraine and those newly appointed people, as well as those newly appointed people in the regions who currently did not submit any declarations, did not carry out any checks that were not conducted on them. i am generally surprised that this initiative is now being submitted by my colleagues, because in fact this initiative should have been submitted by the government of ukraine a long time ago, the government of denys shmyhal, because this is one of the conditions of the e

people's deputy, even with a lot of experience, thank you dear colleagues in the next graduations of ivan orestivna 5 minutes please dear mr. chairman, dear colleagues, i will tell you, perhaps for those who do not read the conclusions of the venice commission, a little secret. the venice commission decided that the so-called de-oligarchization bill promoted by ukraine has nothing to do with de-oligarchization, and proposed to postpone its implementation until after the end of martial law. it was so diplomatically proposed by the venice commission. but at the same time, the venice commission appealed and the european commission appealed to georgia and moldova, which copied the draft law or other law in ukraine to immediately cancel them, which suggests that the same fate will befall this pr action that was approved by a-a in this council and with which the executive power of ukraine was so carried away. at the same time , the venice commission emphasized that ukraine should really bring anti -monopoly legislation into line with european legislation, the ukrainian parliament, again, for some reason,