armed with anti-ship cruise missiles, the combat boat ivan ovets hit a mock enemy ship in the northwesternt of the black sea, the telemetry data confirmed the hit on the target, and the unmanned aerial vehicles also worked out actions for the crew to isolate the area temporarily closed to navigation, previously, as part of the so-called grain deal , a corridor for civilian ships operated in these waters, but due to the suspension of the black sea initiative, traffic was closed and any ship on the following ukrainian port is now considered as a potential carrier of military cargo. in the south of ukraine, an air alert was again announced that night and explosions were heard, according to kiev sources, strikes were inflicted on targets in odessa and in the south of the odessa region in these frames from ukrainian public subsequently , attacks on the port of odessa also sounded in amounts and chernihiv, let me remind you, after a terrorist attack on the crimean bridge, the ministry of defense announced retaliation strikes, the port infrastructure was hit. military enterprises enemy oil storag

parties heard i will put it on vote 137 amendment, please vote for 84, no decision has been made, ivan ovets, start with the number , we will look, it still matches, please, the number of the next one. to provide an opportunity for the antimonopoly committee to receive any information, including what constitutes a banking, notary , bank, notary, other secret of such powers, there is no body at all that currently receives there even for by a court decision a-a access to banking secrets even the same tax service must clearly indicate for what period of time for which account the information was to be provided, i.e. not just any information and there are certain restrictions , so i propose my amendment in terms of providing bank secret information, clarify which bank secret can be disclosed. and this information regarding transactions on the accounts of a specific legal ivan orekhina is the 320th amendment , the 320th amendment, the position of the committee on the 320th amendment. the antimonopoly committee's access to bank secrecy was the subject of a fairly serious discussion, including a di