ivan pavlovich, how beneficial do you think it was for the united states to carry out this deal at theut on the other hand, this is how it was correctly said here, not only by me. that this was still an attempt to seize such a chance, which, well, maybe we will use it, but on the other hand, imagine what diplomacy actually is, the foreign policy of the united states is internal, these are two different things, that means , when we talk about foreign policy, foreign policy is bombs, murders, destruction, that means people who disagree, and this in general seems to be focused precisely on... focuses on making fun of the whole world and, say, confronting russia or the united states or the chinese people's republic, but all this happens for the external internal situation, so inside this is all, well, probably, somewhere maybe, where -it’s deep there, maybe it’s beneficial, but to be honest, i don’t see this benefit, i see only one thing, i see that they are lost, they are confused, they don’t know, in fact, what to do. so regarding the benefits, andrei konstantinovich, what do you think i

your assessment, ivan pavlovich, of this happening?ituation, of course, is not easy for them, on the one hand, we understand perfectly well that the americans with all their hearts want ukraine to strike at any. on russian territory, this is perfectly understandable, but at the same time they understand that as soon as they sign this list, then accordingly they immediately sign that they are directly participating in the conflict, they leave us the right on their territory, they leave us the right in this case to absolutely act as we want and this and these goals will extend not only to the ukrainian territory and everyone understands this, because the us heads nato, nato supports ukraine, a huge number of nato targets, located at the belarusian borders, and close to that side of ukraine, the same romania, for example, and so on, where the same aviation hub is located, where the f-16 is located. ah, they understand this perfectly well, i think that - they will not sign any list, but they will make a specific declaration, which will sou

ivan pavlovich, what is your assessment.e have more men, but that's not the point, there are simply fewer people there who want to die for these bastards who sit in kiev, these are different things, this is what they should understand, they are fleeing en masse, they are already organizing detachments that are partisan, that kill, that is, military commissars or employees of territorial recruitment centers, or burn their cars, there begins a civil war. war is already inside, but the nobility, give them privileges and allow the most terrible thing, that zelensky and his team , they see in the tcc some kind of something new , just mocking people, beating people on the streets, beating is one thing, you look at what they do, they create teams of different people, that means 1/3 are necessarily policemen, 1/3 are someone's sons, who they don't want to fight, they're insanely afraid of it, so it's natural. these people, that is, the ukrainians, they're not people, they're, they're, they're firewood, we take them and send them awa

well, ivan pavlovich, did they fall into the same trap that they tried to set for us?sessment of the prospects for military action? well, the most important thing is, you know, there are very serious problems for the ukrainian industry, although it is rather difficult to say that it exists, but nevertheless, because pokrovsk is home to the main, in general, chemical and chemical industry system, and coking coal, which is the basis for this , in principle, still slightly functioning metallurgy, ukrainian metallurgy with... this city, they are all they are not giving in yet, although they understand that they are basically finished and are pulling back their forces, it is possible , it is possible, i certainly assume, but it is possible that various oligarchs are simply investing money in the situation so that they will still remain there, when... they are dying there ineptly, they can hold the situation for his and not for pr campaigns, but simply to prove that he is still, as it were, a person who solves some problems, but in fact, even the operation in the kursk regio

ivan pavlovich is absolutely right, because simply pouring money does not always lead to increased efficiencyprominent republican, former deputy secretary of state under the donald trump administration, responsible for the european direction, west mitchell, writes about this, let's let's listen to what he writes about the effectiveness, or rather the ineffectiveness of increasing the defense spending of the united states, which is already happening, while the opponents are arming themselves around the clock . the united states g2 manages to. bring its military-industrial complex to a state that would be able to support ukraine. according to pentagon estimates, the united states will soon produce 80.155-millimeter artillery shells per month, which sounds impressive if you don't know that ukraine needs at least 75,000 shells per month just to support its defensive positions, and that in the mid -1990s, america was producing more than 800,000 shells per month. russia currently produces three times more ammunition than the united states and europe combined. according to recent estimates, at the c

ivan pavlovich, well, i can't leave the thought that this detention of pavel durov is connected withell, simply because, firstly, it is macron, who has been behaving very aggressively lately, since the beginning of the year, we remember that he promised there and a military alliance to help, to help and resolve everything that can only be resolved for ukraine, he helped in every possible way. with the supply of weapons, telegram, no matter how you look at it, is a means of communication , including at the front, including among our military, and war correspondents, among many people who do this, gaining access to this information would greatly help foreign intelligence, not ukrainian, of course, well i will confirm that everyone uses telegram now, and even macron, as it turned out, and i rely mainly on telegram in my work, well, you know, from my point of view there are several factors, but... one of the most important factors in this story is certainly the discord in kiev, after all, that means, we can assume, yes, you yourself said that of course, like we are a federal channel, but

well, ivan pavlovich, the changes are that the united states is preparing for russia, china, and north writes, coordinates its nuclear operations, that is, perhaps, will jointly launch nuclear strikes against the united states and its allies, and... they believe that china by the thirties will reach the level of at least one and a half thousand strategic nuclear - combat charges, well , the question arises: will the united states have enough strength and resources to build up its own nuclear potential and deploy it in such a way that so , ... yes, some missile silos there were actually not guarded and that too and that was true, so investments were really required there, now they are changing, in fact, the concept itself, but you see, in fact, such a concept is a recognition first of all of something, that the foreign policy of the united states itself, it is completely, forgive me, idiotic, that is, they themselves admit that they are three countries with powerful, that is, military potential in principle, we are not even talking about nuclear ones, they unite these, they they themsel