preached, another part of freemasonry, for example, believed that, quoting, in my opinion, just ivan perfilyevich elaginin who elagin is, ivan perfilyevich elagin, yes, a close associate of catherine i, a person very close to her, who took the post of obergafmester, one of the founders of the russian theater, the organizer of the russian theater, one of the main organizers of russian masonic lodges during catherine’s reign, the famous elaginskys lodges, yes, the yalaginskie lodges, of which there were 14 and which were not only in moscow in st. petersburg, for example, even in arkhangelsk, and which he created such a network of masonic lodges and... which is just some kind of political i didn’t set goals for myself, so you said that there is no need to idealize, i would also add not to idealize, not to demonize, because people went to the lodges, especially in those times, the first and catherine’s, and later, for very different reasons, someone went because they hoped, i don’t know, to open a philosophical stone, find out the secrets of the druids, the ancient chaldeans, i don’t know who. very big, whi

, another part of freemasonry, for example, believed that, to quote, in my opinion, just ivan perfilyevich elaginent, yes, but you immediately explain who elagin is, ivan perfilyevich elagin, yes. close to catherine, generally a person close to her, who took the post of obergafmeister, one of the founders of the russian theater, the organizer of the russian theater, and one of the main organizers of russian masonic lodges during catherine’s reign, the famous elagin lodges, and the elagen lodges, of which there were 14 and which were not only in moscow in st. petersburg, for example, even in arkhangelsk, and which he created such a network of masonic lies, and which did not set any political goals for himself. they don’t suspect, i remember the first years of perestroika, when our pseudo-patriots, the uraptori, since in freemasonry symbolism is very important, all the signs are there and so on, they were almost looking with a magnifying glass for some, some symbolism in perestroika newspapers, and at the same time, it means they passed by and admired pashkov’s house, say, in moscow, which was buil

good wine in the brotherhood. environment, yes, but you immediately explain who elagin is, ivan perfilyevich elagin's reign, the famous yelaginsky lodges, yes, the yalaginsky lodges, of which there were 14 and which were not only in moscow in st. petersburg, for example, even in arkhangelsk, and which he with... you said that there is no need to idealize, i would also add not to idealize, not to demonize, because people went to the lodges, especially in those times, the first and catherine's, and later, for very different reasons, someone went because they hoped, i don’t know, to discover the philosopher’s stone, to learn the secrets of the druids. that this text was written by mason zhikovsky, a lot in our history is connected with the names mason. here i have in my hands the charter, the constitution, and the liturgy, it’s in spanish, but i translated something, so this is from the declaration principles: we believe in the great architect of the universe and the immortality of the soul, this is a fraternal organization for... self-improvement, members of the organization respect the laws of the c

quoting, in my opinion, just ivan perfilyevich yalagin. that you can sing obscene songs over good wine in a fraternal environment, but you just explain right away who elagin is? ivan perfilyevich elagin, yes, close to catherine ii, a person very close to her, who took the post of obergafmester, one of the founders of the russian theater, organizer of the russian theater one of the main organizers of the russian masonic lies during the reign of catherine, the famous elagin lodges, and the yalagin lodges, of which there were 14 and which were not only in moscow in... in st. petersburg, for example, even in arkhangelsk, yes, and which he created such a network of masonic lies, and who did not set any political goals for himself, yes, you said that there is no need to idealize, i would also add not to idealize, not to demonize, because they went to the lodges, especially in those days, the first and catherine’s, and later, people for very different reasons, some went because they hoped, i don’t know... if we talk about the era of catherine and alexander i, of course, their contribution was very large, which many of us even they don’t suspect, i remember the f