. >> research done by ivan toft historian, wars one country is ten tiemsd greater than the other, you look at in those instances where the smaller country has chose to fight unconventionally, they win the majority of times. this is going back 400 years. in other words, canada, america's ten time ths the sizef canada. if canada chose to fight aness a guerilla war, you should put your money on canada. >> you're saying canada has much better chance than popular media says it does. >> an advantage, but not nearly as much of an advantage as we think. >> he's a man not known for keeping his opinions to himself. in a minute, charles barkley, talks to michael eaves. but a polarizing issue on sports. >> some of the greatest discrimination we've seen lately in american society has to do with gays and members. thissing past season, jason collins are came out as gay. you say you probably played with gay players. >> everybody has played with a gay player and everybody has worked with a gay person. i'm a big proponent of gay marriage. being black i'm really -- it sucks when racism reers its ugly he

. >> if you look historically at combats, there is really fascinating research done by ivan toft, a historian. one time's ten times greater than the other. and you look at in those substancsubstance instances, if merrick attacked canada and canada decided to fight a guerilla warfare, in response, i put my moneys on canada and you and i are canadians. the fact that america is larger and wealthier and has better weapons is an advantage but not nearly as much of afternoon advantage as we think. so if you think of you are canada and invaded by the united states, what weapons would you have? you would have the weapon of anger. you would be willing to fight for your own country in the way an invader wouldn't be invested in the invader. >> in the 1970s they were fighting a gur guerilla war. >> it makes you appreciate your strengths. that's throughout the book. understand i can't play by conventional rules, i have to change the rules. >> you even use the american revolution, as an example, where washington was succeeding, and when he switched to more conventional methods he nearly lost. >> the americ