ivanka trump, eric trump.persistente mente, donald trump ya había calificado el caso como un fraude. así a él, por motivos políticos, ha negado que actuara, que actuó mal. el veredicto de hoy marca una semana judicial muy ocupada, determinante para el futuro del expresidente donald trump, que enfrenta como aquí en noticias telemundo. se lo hemos reportado numerosos frentes legales en medio de la campaña electoral. por la nominación del partido republicano, camino hacia la casa blanca. hoy, fecha determinante. el juez al frente del juicio civil por fraude que ha enfrentado el expresidente donald trump y la organización trump, determinó que el expresidente tiene que. pagar 364 millones de dólares en multas y tendrá prohibido hacer negocio por 3 años en nueva york. es sin duda un golpe duro al expresidente donald trump, a sus finanzas, a su organización, a la imagen que ha cultivado durante mucho tiempo como un empresario exitoso. después de todo lo que el juez está diciendo aquí es que efectivamente el expreside

seen his campaign looks a little different from 2020 and 2016 when he sought other families like ivanka trump, jared kushner with her. that's a good point. we know melania trump has been popular with republican women in particular. i'm curious to see whether they'll bring her out more in the general election to appeal to more women voters. we'll have to see. it's a very good picture. ivanka trump isn't involved in politics. >> before i let you go related to the super bowl. i want to talk about another candidate who many americans saw on their tv screens if they were watching the super bowl. we saw the super pac that's backing robert kennedy jr. airing this ad during the game. i will be honest with you, i was doing other things and you heard the music and i looked up and it's like, what is this? it's an ad from his uncle, jfk, his 1960 campaign. i think we -- do we have a clip of it? okay. let's play it and then we can talk about it. ♪ kennedy, kennedy, kennedy, kennedy ♪ ♪ do you want a man for president who's seasoned through and through ♪ ♪ a man who's old enough to know and young enough to

the interesting thing, sol, the decision mentions ivanka trump, reading this ivanka trump was a thoughtfularticulate and poised witness but the court found her inconsistent recall depending on whether she was questioned by the office of the attorney general or the defense suspect how could she be thoughtful and also suspect? >> i can't get inside the judge's mind but i have a question for everybody which is where were all of these people during the 35 years before donald trump became an announced candidate for president? why weren't these people investigating this alleged fraud? if there is fraud going on, the u.s. attorney's office in the southern district of new york. the district attorney's office in manhattan, it doesn't seem like they were doing their job at all it appears there was no effort whether a so ever to even look at former president trump until he became a controversial political figure. as you pointed out, the attorney general really shocking and unethical for her to be involved in this case when she ran for office on a platform of getting trump which, by the way, alvin bra

it's his family as well because as we've been looking through this, ivanka trump was also part of this. we talked about donald trump jr. and eric trump. there's also who mentioned of ivanka trump in here who had these interviews, but the judge said that while she was thoughtful and a poised witness, he said the idea that she couldn't recall certain details are facts have certain documents are certain projects that she worked on. he says it's suspect and that the court found her inconsistent recall depending on whether she was questioned, suspect, saying that the fact that she cannot recall is memorialized still and contemporaneous emails and documents. and even though there was an absence of her memory on this, there are the documents here, and that is what the judge goes back to time and time again, and he saying, you know, the documents don't lie. and what he was saying here, jake, that you're referencing is the idea that no one who was questioned in this case really ever admitted any error. and he said ever said, i did that by mistake or here's my acknowledgment of that, and that's

testificar a esta corte del bajo manhattan a los 3 hijos mayores del expresidente, incluyendo a ivanka trumpadre. tras la prohibición emitida este viernes. pues a trump no se le impide tener negocios, sino dirigir los personalmente de manera temporal . esta multa de casi 355 millones de dólares podría aumentar porque a los montos fijados por el juez en el veredicto hay que sumarles los intereses. si calculamos lo que debe donald trump al día de hoy con los intereses son 453 millones de dólares, una cifra que seguirá aumentando hasta que el expresidente pague. vanessa es mi reporte de esta noche desde la torre trump aquí en la quinta avenida. muchas gracias, javier. hoy hubo una segunda audiencia para determinar si existió un conflicto de intereses en la relación romántica de la fiscal fannie willis y un miembro del equipo de trabajo. este viernes, willis no regresó a la corte, pero sí estuvo su padre, quien dijo que nunca vio a nathan wade en su casa. también declaró el exgobernador de georgia, roy burns, quien dijo que willis le ofreció el puesto de fiscal especial. pero lo rechazó porque r

testificar a esta corte del bajo manhattan a los 3 hijos mayores del expresidente, incluyendo a ivanka trumpprohibición emitida este viernes. pues a trump no se le impide tener negocios, sino dirigir los personalmente de manera temporal , el. la fiscal general del estado reaccionó esta tarde en una conferencia de prensa. celebró dijo que se hizo justicia y que este veredicto es una victoria para nueva york, un estado donde subrayó ni ricos ni poderosos están por encima de la ley. julio y por qué se dice javier que trump podría terminar pagando mucho más? es que julio, a los montos que definió el juez en este veredicto hay que sumarle los intereses, no solo en el caso de trump, sino los demás acusados. si calculamos al día de hoy lo que debería donald trump son 453 millones de dólares. una cifra que seguirá creciendo hasta que pague julio javier vega en nueva york. muchas gracias. a veces cuesta seguir cada 1 de los casos que el expresidente trump tiene pendientes. aquí lo vamos a llevar con cuidado el próximo 25 de marzo. también en nueva york comienza el juicio relacionado con los pagos par

trump? hay quienes dicen que pudiera ser su hija ivanka ivanka trump, quien también testificó en este juicioás de 2 meses y medio de testimonios y donde la fiscal general de nueva york acusó a esta organización y al expresidente básicamente de mentir en los estados financieros, de inflar su riqueza, de inflar el valor de propiedades para que? para obtener beneficios, por ejemplo, de las aseguradoras o para obtener préstamos por parte de los bancos. estamos a la espera a esta hora de reacciones fundamentales. la propia reacción del expresidente trump. pero sabemos ya sus abogados han dicho que van a apelar esta decisión y también la reacción por parte de la fiscal general del estado de nueva york, quien ha planteado ya una conferencia de prensa en las próximas horas. así que concluye de esta manera aquí en manhattan, una semana muy intensa para el expresidente. en términos legales, porque ayer mismo aquí le pusieron ya fecha para que inicie también el primer juicio penal en su contra. octavio nicole y javier también sabemos que acaba de entrar esa reacción de la abogada. alina dice que este v

so did if ivanka trump. answering questions about what her brother, father, family did with the corporation. the meat of this judgment is a ban on the sons from running the business. they were intentional in this. >> with everything related what type of impact does this have on his campaign, especially knowing just recently, we learned about the march 21st start of the trial of? he will have to be present for several weeks. >> we have lots of different legal buckets for the former president. you have criminal, you have a civil. this is civil but it's much larger than its reputation. this strikes at the very heart of donald trump's larger american story of being an aggressive dealmaker who makes things happen and who builds fortunes for himself and for others. what this case has always been about is was there something illegitimate about all those representations within the trump real estate empire? where things are valued more than they were worth? were things misrepresented to momentarily provide financial

aparición de nuevas pruebas y falsos testimonios después del juicio que anularían la sentencia, ivanka trumpe. bueno, es una entrevista de francisco cuevas. este y otros testimonios del caso de iván cantú los podrán ver con más detalle en noticias telemundo con julio vaqueiro a las 6 35 30 centro. bueno hoy es momento de nuestro pase vip que tenemos hoy quique gonzález cómo estás? bienvenido de vuelta. gracias chicos les cuento. vanessa william regresa a la actuación y a la música y lo hace por todo lo alto. esto será en el reino unido y más adelante les tengo de qué se trata este proyecto que les va a encantar, seguro. mucha gente a mucha gente. si no soy fanática también está bien. bueno, gracias quique. bueno, y 2 de las mayores compañías de tarjetas de crédito buscan fusionarse. les contamos el alcance de esta millonaria operación y las implicaciones sobre todo para ustedes los consumidores. y hablamos con una abogada de inmigración sobre las medidas que deben tener en cuenta beneficiarios de daca. si planean viajar . emmet gates 6 wearing a great shirt para tu cita. de everybody get dow

but the interesting thing thingo is it the decision mentions ivanka trump at rating this advantage. trump wathoughtfs a thoughtful, articulate and poised witness. but the court found hedth her inconsistent recall, depending on whether she was suestionedeneral by office of te attorney general or the defense suspect. sospuld sh so how could you be thoughtful and also suspect? i can't get inside the judge's mind. >> i have a i have a question for for everybody, whichll donahere were all of these people during the 35 years before donald trump became a announced for president?t >> whythes weren't these people investigating this alleged fraud? >> people if there's fraud going on, the u.s. attorney's office in the southern district of new york, the district attorney's office in manhattan, it doesn't seem like they were doing their jo b at all. it appeared that there was no effort whatsoeve r to even look at former president trump until became a controversial political figure. >> and as you pointed ou outt, the the attorney general is really shocking and unethical. she for her to be involved

some have speculated that could mean melania or ivanka trump may step into a leadership role to keep it in the family. but that remains to be seen. >> new developments everyday. bradley blackburn live in new york. thank you. >>> president biden is giving up the pressure on congress to pass in a package that includes roughly $60 billion in assistance for ukraine. he spoke yesterday to reporters in delaware. >> look. the ukrainian people have fought so heroically and put so much on the line, and the idea that now they are running out of ammunition and we walk away, i find it absurd and unethical. i find it contrary to everything we are as a country. >> biden also said he believes russian president vladimir putin is responsible for the death on friday of opposition leader in prison. he was widely considered to be his fierce flow. >>> over 400 people were detained on russia on friday and saturday well mourning the death. a spokesperson confirmed his death, calling in a murder. his family is now demanding answers, starting with where his body is. >> reporter: russia's fiercest voice of op

. >> in fact, ivanka trump said that about 29 or 30 times, i read this morning. before i let you go, quickly, i wanted to ask you, there's certain limitations on a special counsel statute. do you think attorney general merrick garland would've done something differently here? could he have? >> he could have, he could've pointed to someone else, he could've pointed at a different special counsel -- really bent over backwards to do the right thing, to withdraw the department from the terrible reputation it had under trump of being politicized and tragically, edthat requires you to anticipate a certain amount of professionalism and faith in the system and faith in the people who were appointed, and of course that confidence, that expectation was completely betrayed here. completely betrayed. and so in hindsight, it's too easy to say he should've just appointed someone. he heknew it would be more impartial, but ideally you appoint a prosecutor that will improve public confidence in the report, you don't expect them to be a hack, and in this case, we misjudged mr. her

he found ivanka trump not to be credible. he found eric trump completely uncredible and found through a number of examples where things he said were completely belied by the documents. when you have those kind of findings, it makes it very hard for a court of appeal to touch those. >> donald trump is going to run this year against the united states. he calls it the biden justice department, which of course it isn't. he's running in a way against the rule of law. a normal candidate, a normal anyone, you lose an opinion in court, you say, i think it's wrong, i'm going to appeal. i have a high regard for the judicial system, especially if you're a former president. he is trashing the entire thing. he is convining a large minority of citizens that we have a fundamentally corrupt legal system in this country. >> people say they don't want to hear a quote from him or a clip or anything. we tried to give equal time to both speakers on both sides of this case. you have to hear enough to at least understand that kind of savage barrage

let's talk about ivanka trump. a thoughtful, articulate, page 45. a thoughtful, articulate and poised within. the court found her inconsistent recall, depending on whether she was questioned by oag, or the defense, suspect. in any event, what ms. trump cannot recall is memorialized in contemporaneous e-mails and documents. in the absence of her memory, the documents speak for themselves. >> i was in the courtroom the day ivanka testified. i agree with the general characterization of her. she was calm, thoughtful, articulate and poised, and yet her lack of recollection was suspect, for lack of a better word, but one of the things that the attorney general's office showed her and went through sort of methodically were all the e-mails she had, particularly as she maintained the relationship with deutsche bank as well as e-mails where she reached out to her husband to get introductions to prospective lenders. it was showing the desperation of the trump situation. they were already in a position where many of the most well known, vaunted commercial lender

not a medical expert and not discussing her mental health or mental capacity or her aging but ivanka trump said i don't recall 30 times just during the civil fraud trial alone. the wider dynamic is actually one that a biden friendly campaign vetted, chai komanduri has previously discussed here as a political challenge. >> joe biden, yes, let's talk about honestly, okay. he is old. age is an issue. ageism is an issue. americans have a rich history of holding people's physical characteristics against them. okay, you can ask african americans. you can ask women. that is a fact. that is a problem. that is something that we are definitely going to have to fight on and something democrats will have to address head on. >> komanduri said that before all of this recent hur stuff and that's the political side, there is a kind of superficial somewhat unfair set of assumptions people make in many societies including this one about how people come across and that you have to deal with that politically. that's certainly fair. now, ageism is not being literally substantive equated to say sexism, somethin

he also testified, as his three adult children, don, junior, eric, and ivanka trump and while he was , he even almost got thrown off the stand for campaigning. on the final day of the while trump made one last ditch effort to try to convince the judge to find his way. and that clearly carried no wait >> a >> devastating blow to trump's reputation as a successful businessman after a new york supreme court judge ordered him and his company to pay nearly $355 million barring him from serving as a company director in the city where he made his billions, where his name is plastered on skyscrapers for three years donald trump may have authored the author of the deal but he perfected the audit is still this long running fraud was intentional. >> agree. jus illegal. >> friday's ruling follows in nearly three month long trial filled with dramatic moments trump himself often chose to attend court, though he was only required to be there when he testified this trial was hello, road that fasttrack. this trial could have been brought years ago, but they waited till i was right in the middle of my

if they are banned from doing the business and if ivanka trump, who has essentially stepped away from enterprise business-wise and politically, the question becomes one of who will take over the running of the trump business. that's a question they've got to be asking and other people are asking, too. as much as they've been forbidden because there is a monitor watching everything from selling off assets and moving assets around in order to not have to respond to any penalties that people thought were coming. so a big question now, what does this family do in the interim, if donald trump himself is banned and if his adult sons are banned from doing business in trump enterprise, what happens to trump enterprise at that moment? >> rahema, we'll ask you to stand by. let me bring back kristen welker. you talked about donald trump using his legal woes to his political advantage. we haven't seen the same thing necessarily from the biden camp. >> that's right. and what's notable is that president biden has walked a really fine line when it comes to talking about former president trump's lega

i'm just thinking ivanka trump. i mean, we know we know the history that wasn't a policy level. this is this is just politics. you talked about nikki haley in her campaign. this is what her campaign manager said. trump just announced he is rearranging the deck chairs on the titanic under donald trump, the current rnc leadership republicans lost elections in 2018, 2,020.20, 22, and now the rnc is effectively bankrupt. >> i mean, she has to make that argument because they're not supporting her at all. yeah. >> she's still in this contest. she's still running this race but the rnc is basically engaged in a pressure campaign to get her to step out. so this is her pushback, right? >> everybody standby because the senate just pulled off a rare bipartisan win. so why won't the house speaker bringer bill to the floor, shot tucker got comes down to donald trump, will tell you what the details are after a quick break >> i've done a lot wrong. criminal, none i don't want to thank that i was taking cash, >> bonds, went back there. >> governor rod blagojevich went down in a blaze of infamy, c

that's also something ivanka trump did 29 or 30 times when she was interviewed. no one thinks she's losing, at or senile. of course, she's not. >> you know the inner workings of all this, so, let's go with what the washington post said. it is a very detailed account of all the events surrounding this interview. the presidents team had spent significant time preparing biden to discuss his role in handling the documents, as well as his views on the propriety of keeping note cards work he had jotted down classified information. they did not anticipate that the president's ability to recall dates around the details which figure into the questioning. my question to you, jen, was the president properly prepared for that interview? >> that does not seem to be the issue, alex. i think that story, which i read this morning, also notes that her was more generous to people who said, during his interviews with them, i don't remember, i don't recall. other people. he was particularly aggressively critical, and provided his own unqualified medical guidance, of president biden.

donald trump, it is also personal that this involves his family, his sons, and the ruling mentioned ivanka trump his daughter as well and jennifer rodgers to you, the former president, alleging here that this is a novel ruling what do you say to that? >> it's not a novel ruling briana in terms of the statute used, i will say there are a number of legal issues here on materiality and other issues that i think an appellate court will take a hard look at. it's an exhaustive opinion that judge and goren issued here more than 90 pages. he goes through all of the witnesses, all of the causes of action, all of the defenses that they raised. so it's really a comprehensive judgment here and the appellate court will have some things to take a look at, but the notion that no business in new york has ever been subject to this, no person has ever been subject to this is just not true. >> and jennifer, you expect object that as this goes through the appeals process, this judgment will take a haircut >> i think it might certainly it's just such a huge judgment and when the expert witnesses were testifying abou

wonder what you made of what the judge said about eric trump and donald trump jr., and also even ivanka trump she was very poised and thoughtful in her testimony, but also said thank that it was suspect what she couldn't remember, which he said the documents themselves could prove. >> well, she was thoroughly impeached she couldn't remember anything all about details that she'd obviously written memos about an emails that were introduced into evidence exchanges is about details of things. and this is the trump way. you simply lie and deny and don't worry about it because it's just your word against the other person's and this judge, to very good job of showing how this was a web of lies calculated to deceive even in his courtroom i wonder what you made of just no one would intend today knowing this judgment was coming, thinking that trump was >> necessarily going to get off. well, he had already been found liable for fraud >> but i wonder >> what you think it was, what it was like for trump to actually see that, that he was held accountable for $355 million >> what donald will be in a state o

now, it's also interesting, the judge also talked about ivanka trump, who testified in this case. he described her testimony as thoughtful and articulate but said that her repeated memory lapses about details of deals that she worked on were quote, suspect. now, throughout this case, trump and his lawyers and some of his children lose two of his children, took a very combative a defiant, remorseless approach to this case. and we can see now the result, it has yielded a verb that will likely drain his coffers. it's not even clear that he can actually pay these penalties even if his business technically survives. >> and paula, last hour, you brought us the statement from trump attorney alina haba. now we're hearing from trump's main lawyer on the case. what is he saying? >> so here, chris kise has issued a statement saying, quote, the court today ignored the law, ignore the facts, and simply signed off on the attorney general's manifestly unjust political crusade against the front running running kit front running candidate for the president of the united states president trump will

whether or not that is -- ivanka trump that she didn't discuss january 6th with her husband either. actually fine. and give them the benefit of the doubt and say they did, but this is about a court that's 20% less esteemed in the views of the american people than it was in 2020 after it decided bush v. gore. >> your point about esteem is a good one, because while this sets the trial back, as judge luttig said, chances of it happening before the election are at best questionable, maybe even unlikely. if the supreme court does affirm resoundingly, even with one or two on the other side, the concept that a president is not immune, then it does give the prosecution ultimately arguably more legitimacy. and if the ultimate audience here is not just the jury that sits and hears the allegations, but america, in terms of the sort of the rule of law and does it matter, then maybe one of the weird silver linings of this is while delay, it does give the potential imprompter of the supreme court of the well-reasoned d.c. circuit opinion and it emphasizes 100%, unequivocally, the president is not

ivanka trump is probably a better example.not a party, but told she had to come. now, she's not a person under threat, but i think that jack smith and his team are taking very seriously any indications of threats to witnesses. i wanted to talk about something jordan said about whether the court is going to take the immunity case. it's so important. you can't imagine a universe in which they don't want to have the last and final say. on the other hand, someone i highly respect said to me bad facts made bad law. these are bad facts in the sense that donald trump as an outlier unlike any other among american presidents, if they use his case and alleged misdeeds to cast the immunity rule by which future presidents will be judged and have their own immunity governed, we could see a situation which future presidents have or warned prosecuted and if you hold that just having an imprunety or not means you have to go through trial, think about people who come to the office without the purported wealth donald trump has. he might not be

laughter ] yep, trump wants his daughter-in-law to run the rnc when asked how he landed on lara, trump was like, "ivankano. [ laughter ] and you go - you guys see this? the ratings just came in for the super bowl, and it was the most-watched television broadcast since the moon landing. [ audience ohs ] and just like the moon landing, when taylor and travis kissed, half the people were like, "this is a government conspiracy [ laughter ] they didn't do that there. they were in a studio in burbank! [ applause ] oh, and get this the biden administration said it will be up to the chiefs whether taylor swift is invited to the white house for their super bowl celebration yeah the white house was like, "yeah, no big deal, it's fine either way." and then they laid a trail of friendship bracelets out on the south lawn [ laughter ] taylor being there would really help biden's approval rating, but so would knowing where to walk after a speech. [ light laughter ] switching gears, the cdc is going to drop their guidance that people who tested positive for covid should isolate for five days. basically, the cdc went to

followed was a months-long trial and you may remember, trump attended much of that trial, how he even testified along with three of his adult children, ivanka, eric, and don junior. but trump is also very combative during these proceedings. he attacked the judge, he attacked the judge's clerk. he frequently attacked the attorney general, letitia james, who brought this case even violated a gag order that just restricted him from attacking members of the court staff. that trial focused on some other charges and possible penalties. and here the new york attorney general seeking a penalty of 370 million and wants to bar trump from doing business in the state of new york. the so-called corporate death penalty is rarely enacted here in the state of new york especially when there's not a clear victim. that was one of the lines of trump's defense that no one really lost money here and they continued doing think business. but this is why trump is watching this so closely, jim, i mean, this is a case you think about it a hundreds of millions of dollars in addition to the tens of millions of dollars jury just awarded e. jean carroll. this is a case t

trump cares about. basically the caucus is ivanka, and the primary is eric. [ laughter ] the burger king needs all the winse can get right now. a d.c. federal appeals court today issued their much-anticipated decision on whether or not trump has "presidential immunity" he claimed he had that would protect him from being prosecuted for all his many crimes. the appeals court ruled unanimously that trump does not have immunity. [ cheers and applause ] kind of a bummer because the poor guy drank all that bleach for nothing. [ laughter ] the three-judge panel shot down his arguments in a strongly worded 57-page ruling. it was a devastating moment for trump. especially when melania started clapping. [ laughter ] trump said the ruling was "so bad, and so dangerous for our nation." of course, he'll now appeal to the supreme court, which is the legal equivalent of, "well, then i want to speak to your manager." [ laughter ] it's unclear if the supreme court will even hear the case. which would mean the ruling would stand. according to a new poll from cnn, a majority of americans want to see a verdict in the january

a future trump administration could have jared as chief of staff, ivanka as ambassador to the u.n., andr. as head of the d.e.a., the drug enjoyment agency. folks are still rattled by trump's statement that he would "encourage" russia to do what it wanted to our nato allies. and i'm being told putin has pushed france out a window. well, now we have an update from former national security adviser and colonel sanders' brother who went to kentucky fried law school, john bolton. in an upcoming book, bolton predicts that if trump is elected, "nato would be in real jeopardy. i think he would try to get out." and you know he wouldn't do it to their face. he would just send nato one of those pizza hut break-up pizzas. this is such a shocking idea that president biden took a break from succumbing to entropy to express his opinion about leaving nato. >> it's dumb. it's shameful. it's dangerous. it's un-american. >> stephen: strong words, joe. and, coincidentally, trump's new campaign slogan. oh, the ratings are in from the super bowl, and it was super! in fact, super bowl lviii was the most-watche

administration in current day, let's go back to when you had donald trump the real estate developer in new york and is daughter ivanka it at that moment in time 2014 and 2015 russia was a big opportunity for real estate development and hotel development american companies, mcdonald's, dunkin' donuts everybody wanted to be an russia. i think the opportunity was seen this is a way to go after donald trump, candidate trump then president trump and tie him to russia when all he saw was a business opportunity. maria: hilary clinton i remember covering hilary clinton at cnbc and she was trying to get ru russia, american technology executives to go to russia to create the next silicon valley. it was pretty incredible there is no conversation about that how hilary clinton led somebody technology, cisco, john chambers to russia to try to create a silicon valley in russia. >> she was a part of the administration were obama mocked mitt romney for saying the '80s call they want their foreign-policy back they wanted to wrap up putin. john brennan and his handwritten notes called the scheme the clinton plan explicitly to deflect f

trump. who is going to run the business? ivanka? doubtful. y as far away from this scenario as she possibly can. they have their own life. so what happens to the trump corporation? >> who do you think runs the business, especially given that you have this monitor that's going to continue to baby sit the business? >> you need a monitor to baby sith considering if you read engoron's decision there's a reason why a monitor, a receiver has been appointed to ensure that donald doesn't high poth cate, transfer or incumber these assets further than they are so as not to frustrate the judgment. >> talk me through what it would look like for the business to potentially sell off assets in order to get to place of financial liquidity? >> i don't think it's possible at least not with the new york state assets. so, for example, the thing many people are forgetting, is donald trump's basis in the bulk of his assets is relatively zero. 40 wall street. $1 million. the parking lots that he owns, the restaurants, they were all taken as the sponsor when he was d

during his speech, trump decided to thank every member of his family let's see how he did >> my family, melania, barron - [ bell dings ] don jr. and kimberly - [ bell dings ] ivanka jared - [ bell dings ] tiffany and michael. [ bell dings ] they're so supportive, so supportive of me and we really appreciate it and love them. [ buzzer ] [ laughter ] >> jimmy: almost trump's family said it would've actually been a sign of mental decline if he did include eric [ light laughter ] even worse, eric is still waiting on stage for his name to be called, like, "can i leave now? well, the big story from today is that trump appealed the $464 million judgment in his new york civil fraud trial yeah, trump is so desperate for money, today he asked to pawn melania's wedding ring and she was like, "you're 20 years too late. [ laughter ] but on top of the 464 million, trump is now accruing over $100,000 of interest each day. when asked why, the judge said, "because it's funny. [ laughter ] trump now has 27 days to come up with $464 million even more upsetting, at&t offered to chip in five bucks. [ laughter ] did you guys see this? at&t has announced that customers affected by last

trump debe cambiar. sus directivos y la única de la familia que no está incluida bajo esta sentencia es ivanka, quien estaríaración. este es un juicio que ha durado más de 2 meses desde un comienzo. el juez era un. señaló que aquí se partía de la base de que había culpabilidad, de que él es presidente. trump. sus hijos y miembros de su corporación habían inflado los avalúos de los edificios de su compañía para poder beneficiarse con préstamos bancarios, lo que se considera que es un delito y un fraude en el estado de nueva york. en todo este proceso siempre hubo tensión entre el juez y el expresidente trump, incluso tuvo que sancionarlo en varias ocasiones para que no se refiriera al tema. cuando salía de la corte a hablar con los periodistas de esta manera se da pie a esta segunda sentencia. recuerden que ya hubo una primera en la que tiene que pagar 83 millones de dólares. en el caso de difamación contra una columnista y ahora se está hablando de los 354 millones que ha de terminado el juez, recordando que la fiscal del estado de nueva york, quien estará hablando en las próximas horas, había pedido 370 mil

trump. as we all know, ivanka moved to florida and distanced herself from the family business, political and financial, and that means the whole future of the trump organization in terms of its governance by a family member is really at issue today. i agree with glenn, not only are these civil cases a foreshadowing of what could be to come in the criminal cases, i think they have the potential to unhinge and upset donald trump more so than the prospect of jail time or a conviction, because they -- >> i agree. >> -- go to the heart of what matters to him, the money. >> yeah. all these cases, it's women holding him accountable, which i think irks him in a big way. joyce vance, your thoughts on that? also, i'm curious, watching the testimony yesterday in atlanta, what did you make of the trump attorneys? did they seem prepared? did they seem, like, talented attorneys? >> so i'll take the second part of that first, mika. i mean, we saw a mixed bag yesterday. donald trump's lawyer, steve sado, when he questioned witnesses, was in a different vain than michael roman's lawyer. she was, as you point

trump gave a shout out to his family. >> 5 of all my family, baron, don jr. and kimberly, ivankand jared, tiffany and michael, they're so supportive. >> jimmy: okay. melania wasn't there by the way, of course. but did you forget anybody who was? i'll give you a hint. his name rhymes with generic, eric, and his wife laura who were there. he forgot them. about six minutes later somebody hands him a note. uh-oh, i better mention laura and eric. >> so i have a son. he is a very talented guy. we love him and his wife is very good, she's so good, lara. and i want to thank eric and lara for doing such a fantastic job. >> jimmy: wherever you are, thank you. "he's still learning to tie his shoes. loop the loop, i tell him!" trump beat haley in south carolina by less than he hope head would beat her. among voters with a college degree, he and haley were widely tied, but trump won with nonedge indicatesed voters. absolutely dominates among voters who have been hit on the head with a boulder or a falling brick. and despite a loss in her home state, nikki haley said she is still in this to wi

apparently like we can't trust -- we can't trust a son or ivanka, got to go to lara trump.t of money that he has been raising, the amount of money going to his legal defense fund to prop him up that way, that's what she will do at the rnc. >> that's a huge part of this. the money they're raising is paying trump's legal bills situation it is for his campaign or the campaign of any other candidate. lara trump was an active member of the 2020 re-election campaign as well. she has done this before. rev, what also happened yesterday, again, this is a total takeover here of the trump family of the rnc, jared kushner said flat out he would not come back to a white house if his father-in-law were elected again. he said he would focus on his private equity fund he said these remarks at an event for it. do we believe him? what do we make of that? >> why would we ever believe jared kushner or donald trump? i mean, first of all, i do take him at his word, he won't be coming back to the white house because i don't think his father-in-law will be coming back either. if people come out an

ivanka on the phone, stat! >> guillermo: okay, i will, yes. >> jimmy: thank you. all right. [ laughter ] we could put the whole dumb family on the show. the fraudigal son, donald trumpunior, had a little scare yesterday. a team wearing hazmat suits were dispatched to his home in jupiter, florida, because djtj contained an unidentified white powder. usually when the hazmat team gets called to don jr.'s, it's because his hair clogged the toilet. [ laughter ] in this case, they analyzed, they found that the substance did not seem to be dangerous. probably just something from his friends in the white powder movement. [ laughter ] i guess his job now is shouting at his computer. because his big subject today was google a.i. google a.i., i don't know if you heard, in the name of racial diversity, has been creating ridiculous images of black and latino nazis. if you tell it to make a picture of a nazi, it wants to include everyone. so it paints nazis from every color of the rainbow. it also, according to junior, does this with other historical figures, including a black george washington, which, as you will see, bothers him a lot. >> this -- this is what google gemini says

trump during her time in the white house. remember that jacket she wore that said, "i really don't care, do you?" according to a new book, that was a shot at ivankawith whom she was competing for press attention. there are a number of fresh revelations in this book. the book's called, "american woman: the transformation of the modern first lady." it says melania used her office at the white house so rarely, she had it converted into a gift-wrapping room and spent the majority of her time as first lady in "meetings with teams of lawyers to examine her assets and attend to matters associated with her pre and postnuptial agreements with her husband." [ laughter ] that sounds right. she probably just wanted to make sure she didn't get stuck with eric in a divorce. [ laughter and applause ] there's good stuff. the book says trump "flew into a fury" when he caught melania watching cnn on air force one. she liked to watch cnn, so he ordered that all tvs be tuned to fox news at all times. i like that. for all the corruption and bigotry and bragging and tough talk, at heart, he's still a petty little bitch. [ laughter ] [ applause ] melania watching cnn i

i've speculated half seriously if donald trump had his way for a selection of vp nominee, he would choose a member of his own family, choose ivankahis to be a family business. he wants this to be a dynasty. you're seeing what he's doing to the rnc. to jason's point, the rnc actually does important things in terms of voter lists, in terms of voter contact, in terms of money. and what donald trump is doing is not simply making it just a complete creature of the maga movement, but he's stripping away any pretense that this is -- that the leadership is chosen on the basis of some or the of expertise that would know to put laura trump in there is really a statement on his part. >> i have about 30 seconds. wouldn't it be something after all these republicans auditioning to be his vp if he chose someone from his own family? >> that's probably what he'll end up doing. jared's not busy. they're not selling state secrets. it's highly trump will pick somebody he likes. automatic of that is ultimately dangerous. but the key is just because there may be incompetent leadership at the rnc doesn't mean democrats can sit down to what charlie said