there was a minister of the ministry of economy, which changed many things in the country of iver subramovich. and these changes withstood poroshenko tried to break them, they tried to collect them in groysman's government, in the governments of his successors, but these changes withstood and made the process of managing state property , public procurement, and so on much more transparent. your thesis is one that i do not accept, you know, then i am already concluding with regard to the advisors of the minister of internal affairs. i will simply remind you that some guladze and hatiya deans did not complete the reform of the ministry of internal affairs, which they started, they violated the reform in view of the fact that the internal resistance of the system was supported, the fact remains a fact, yes, not the elites, yes, friends about kramatorsk, a few words blocked their reforms, in fact, and they were forced to resign from office, if they were in office and served the full term of their powers, i am convinced that the mia system would have been reformed even then and we would not have r