>> very much the way richard haass and ivo daalder do.ent obama, well, that was no drama obama. but in the weeks leading up, intelligence, diplomatic and defense officials were filled with dread about the consequences of this. i mean, nothing will change in terms of the u.k. being a major partner. i mean, this is a country that we share language and culture and world view. but as richard said, the concern is that it will be a less effective partner, that is that prime minister cameron and whoever succeeds him will be a distracted partner, that they will be potentially weaker because -- if there's a breakup in the british isles and a poorer partner, as one official said, who may not even be able to make the 2% threshold in n.a.t.o. finally, of course, there's the question about whether it weakens u.s. diplomatic leverage in europe. some people feel that's been overstated. it wasn't terribly effective to work through britain, say, to get germany last year to soften the terms for greece, but, still, with europe -- with the u.k. having a seat