this article misstated the percentage of recent calls to the mississippi poison control center related ivr mac than it was 2 percent. not 70 percent. how the hell can the new york times justify keeping an article up online after they've admitted it was 99 percent wrong? they should delete the article and write a new article titled, we know right, good. but current, gosh, if ya, me. and then the writers, the researchers, the ad or the photographers, anyone that worked on that article should be put in the witness protection program, given jobs, parking lot attendance. and every time they told their bought the law was 70 percent, vo. he would know they meant to present this correction is insane . it rains right up there when to time. see you then reported that congressman ted lew grabbed a crowbar from his office to fight on january 6th writers at the capital. and then later they wrote correction. a previous version of the story miss stated that ted lew, grab the crowbar before leaving his office. he grabbed an energy bar. honestly if you must take a protein bar for a crowbar give you you, yo

earlier in the week, you had the big humanitarian conference with around the ivr $1000000000.00. now released fiji miniature assistance. that's a different different source of funding we're seeing now. but in the health sector, we'll get close to at least $66000000.00 support a lot of these health facilities till the end of the year until we find another mechanism. but here we can handle what kind of way can it lasted in the year. they were trying to jump in and so jose, thank you. well, i agree with colleagues that help fix or is it the lot i know if we want understand what the with lack of funding to ask them is it's important that we find out ways i understand the con, concerns of donor for china lane not, not a channel they want to taliban, we need to find out a furnace he's making use. let's not forget that. over the past 2, dickie and be more than 80 percent of services and i've done it on war delivered by non governmental organization and yield. so we need to support, do you think there can be an opportunity or equitable intermediate you like us or your feet to, to support

and therefore for the drums, ivr for let's say, center left or center, right. still view relationship review as is of crucial importance and remains. but this does not prevent germany from reflecting on areas veil to, let's say perhaps to coordinate. busy or to concentrate policies with us, but there were have, let's say they would follow another line when v us, what difference does your vision of a new world, the perceived by european nato members? what, what difference can they make? if not only the drone strikes being arranged in germany, but germany is a massive seller of weapons to the war on yemen. the world's largest humanitarian crisis in 201-9198 arms exports approved. 257000000. i'm going to merkel has been spearheading arms exports that are used against the poorest countries on earth as you, as you know, very well, could this change under any new european european policy restructuring as regards some kind of policy that would be supported by the global, silent 1st, 1st, i don't know whether the strikes by drones, you know, god is thought has been dir