ayotte j.m. bergeroutlined on one hand we understand people who are on twitter and radicalizing danger but on the other hand the fbi sweeping up thousands of accounts and archiving forever anyways feels like 1984 by george orwell. explaining decisions, can also defuse the greatest because moving forward, we are in a world whether real or imagined grievances can catch on very quickly and the u.s. can think of what it should do to minimize the usb anda target. >> good. thank you all. >> i was handed the vote that has been scheduled. >> thank you to all of you had after reading your testimony. my main line of questioning was about how you create to the future groups. i would like to have a detour and follow. dr. gartenstein-ross, between traditional and social media and all so wanting to make news today on social media to be picked up by producers. could you unpack more your comments, please. >> yes. he didn't have much social media penetration. when you look at what is being broadcast i say started out wi

j.m. berger. mr. berger is the non-resident fellow in the project on u.s. relations with the islamic world of the brookings institute and the author of "jihad joe americans who go to war in the name of islam and isis, the state of terror." mr. bergen. j. m. berger: thank you for having me. i think that i would like to start by talking about the lone wolf threat, because that's on everyone's mind after the events of this weekend. isis is in many ways appears to be the first jihadist group to kind of crack the lone wolf formula. the idea of leaderless resistance and attack goes back to the 1980s, the white supremacist movement. and people had been trying to make it work ever since. and the problem with lone wolves is that it is too easy to stay at home, generally. people are not going to get adequately motivated to carry out an attack without having social reinforcement. and that defeats the purpose of being a lone wolf, to escape detection by not talking to anyone. isis has mixed up this formula a

j.m. berger. mr. berger is the non-resident fellow in the project on u.s. relations with the islamic world of the brookings institute and the author of "jihad joe americans who go to war in the name of islam and isis, the state of terror." mr. berger. j. m. berger: thank you for having me. i think that i would like to start by talking about the lone wolf threat, because that's on everyone's mind after the events of this weekend. isis is in many ways appears to be the first jihadist group to kind of crack the lone wolf formula. the idea of leaderless resistance and attack goes back to the 1980s, the white supremacist movement. and people had been trying to make it work ever since. and the problem with lone wolves is that it is too easy to stay at home, generally. people are not going to get adequately motivated to carry out an attack without having social reinforcement. and that defeats the purpose of being a lone wolf, to escape detection by not talking to anyone. isis has mixed up this formula a

j.m. berger outlined before, the hard decision in terms of monitoring american's use of social media. on the one hand we understand that people who are on twitter and radicalizing can pose a danger. on the other hand, when we think of the fbi sweeping thousands and thousands of accounts and archiving them forever that in many ways seems like 1984 by george orwell. i think it can help diffuse part of that grievance. moving forward we're in a world where grievances, weather real or imagined can catch on quickly. the u.s. can feel what it should be to minimize the u.s. being a target. >> good. thank you all. >> thank you senator carper. our vote that was scheduled at 10:30 has been moved to 2:00. so we won't have interceptions. senator sass. >> thank you mr. chair manned all of you for being here. after reading your testimony my mainline of questioning was going to be about how you create strategic brand damage to eye sill and future jihadi groups. before we go there i'd like to have a detour. dr. g

anyway, thank you, j.m. berger and eugene rob soviet republic. as bad as it looks for the anti-isis efforts by the president, it doesn't look like toys' lot more bigger idea on the other side of how to do it. coming up, there's an old saying democrats fall in love and republicans fall in line and it looks like the 2016 republican presidential candidates are falling all over each other to fall in line with the party's right wing even if it means disc earlier more moderate positions. >>> plus two big stories on the equality front. first, the polls are closed in ireland today and supporters are optimistic that they have got the votes today to pass an historic referendum legalizing same-sex marriage in ireland, of all places. >>> and meanwhile here at home the head of the boy scouts former defense secretary, robert gates, the man who oversought end of the military's don't ask don't tell policy calls for an end to the ban on day scout masters. that's fascinating. >>> and looking what happens when president obama, president obama joined twitter this we

. >> i agree with what j.m. bergerthat we are in line for a radical change, and the question for us is are we up for this new err. i think we've grown content with a system in which a lot of things don't work where we try to address problems, and it gets lost somewhere in the bureaucracy, and there's an interagency process and everybody's waiting for somebody else to do something and what we're getting in terms of outputs is so suboptimal that if the u.s. government was a corporation, people would lose their jobs. i think the questions are can we move fast enough, are there too many bureaucrat obstacles? if so, what can we do to slash them, and are we transparent enough both internally and externally getting buy-in publicly and in the broader world community. we've talked a number of times about how the u.s. has a bad brand. that's absolutely true are. there's no question about that. but i also think looking big picture, we shouldn't be content with this. the u.s. is a great country. we shouldn't be content with the u.