only thing that would move you would be these preannoun preannouncements - >> that would worry me jabrilame out, yeah, they're yapping, yellen yellen, yellen, they're yelling yellen i listen to jabril because i'm a complete geek. i get home from a great dinner at a hotel with my wife, jabril, no, they do 24% of the business is apple first rule about apple you're not allowed to talk about apple, it's like a total fight club situation. jabil says if you look at it being on a sequential basis, on year over year basis i think it's quite good but i can't add a lot of color bingo, apple is on target so they're the heaviest right now people want to knock down apple because it's like whack amole, boom in the end, carl, we may look at the stocks, nvidia cooled off, i want to get in there because gaming is good apple's come down to the level -- >> we have been there before. >> thank you. >> a couple months ago, right? >> we have been there before look, again, if you look at the industrials and the housing stoc stocks after yellen talk and they got knocked down, but i look at the employment number,

like this guy jabril who is a palestinian american and another guy like al-awlaki who has been dead for media echo chambers. they are networked. they are connected with each other over social media. every case we have studied that we found they also have an offline element to them. they are connected offline, too. radicalization doesn't just occur online. there has to be that offline real world connection. through our studies we have found that same applies here with rashid. they were connected with the network now banned organization in the u.k. their leader was convicted for pledging allegiance to isis. and so theresa may's plans to regulate the internet one of the problems with them is that it is somewhat impractical because most of the social media companies are based in america. and you have the first amendment rights that we don't have here. and so somebody can be espousing completely outland dish extremist ideas. insofar as they are not specifically and directly advocating for targeted violence, social media companies protect their rights to espouse extremist ideas under the firs

his name is imam jabrill.nd to be associated with a number of isis recruits while he sits in michigan preaching this sort of anti-americanism, etc. so we muslims have to start to make these guys radioactive so that the antiseptic of sunlight is apparent, and they become pariahs in the community. but until that, this can't be fixed by homeland security -- neil: do you think they're just afraid for their own lives? >> no, that's a copout. listen, people should be afraid for their lives, neil, are my family in aleppo dodging bombs, and isis has really set up shop down the street. neil: that's going to explain their reluctance to help authorities if time and again -- i'm not saying all, but a good money, obviously, pass up the opportunity to share, you know, curious things they notice. >> yeah. the problem is denial, a sense of lack of urgency, it's not my problem. the lack of a linkage between nonviolent islamism and jihaddism with the violet islamism. that lack of linkage which was the media, universities, other

>> imam jabrill. he's like a rock star in the jihadi world.a million people following him, you don't know how many are real, but this is one of the top guys they're listening to. 60% of the foreign fighters that have gone to syria follow him on twitter. stuart: so you're saying, i don't want to put words in your mouth, but you're saying that that imam incited this violence. he helped push this man in london towards that violence. therefore, he's guilty of something, and he could be arrested, is that your case? >> well, if you're preaching and inciting, a lot of the time the authorities will say, oh, well, that's protected free speech. stuart: and it is. >> well, you can also make the argument that it is treason, it's sub subversion. whenever you declare or advocate jihad, that's advocating war. it's almost as if when hitler declares war on the united states, it's almost like if he didn't say it in english, he didn't declare war. stuart: i think you're agreeing about my position which is the mood has changed. no longer can we tolerate pure defe