i'm jack otter.stocks hitting multiple record highs less than two months into the new year. ed yardeni sees an economic trend that could power the market higher than even most bulls predict. then, toyota may have been right about electric vehicles all along. its stock hitting an all-time high this wreak as it profits off hybrids while other automakers are hitting a roadblock. and later, a tip on how you can play the super bowl as an nervous. but first, our expert panel and three things investors ought to be thinking about right now. on the barron's round teenager ben levisohn, meg an leonard and al a root. ben, s&p 5,000, we finally got there. we know it really doesn't mean anything, but it's kind of fun. >> everybody loves those big, round numbers. i mean, they're big and they're round and they're numbers. the number i really want to draw attention to is the number 14. that's how many weeks out of the last 15 the s&p 500 has been up. and it hasn't had that happen since 1972. and the market's been ab

i am jack otter.ing up a massive number jump in jobs added to the economy in january surprises the street. a revision for previous month adding even more will look at what it means for the markets and the federal reserve next move. and then stocks repeatedly hitting all-time highs in 2024 as markets hold out hopes of a soft landing for the economy, charles schwab and liz and sanders will look under the hood at what's driving the rally and how investors can take advantage. later boeing backlash is weighing on the company as safety remains a top concern for flyers. we'll take a look at shares safety by and what stocks are benefiting from the fallout. first we begin with our expert panel and three things investors out of think about right now on the "barron's roundtable". ben levisohn, teresa and andrew bary. so much data flowing in and the jobs report in the tech earnings, get to the bottom, tell us was moving the market. >> what i love about the market does the unexpected. we had the hottest of hot job

and jack smith is not mincing any words. so that's the first point that there's a likelihood, there's no likelihood that trump's going to get this. and then he goes on for page after page, it's just devastating, ari, explaining why trump's claim fails constitutional logic, principles and the like, and then the last thing, and i think we're going to hear a lot about this, at the very end, smith says, look, supreme court, if you want to hear this case, hear it quickly. expedite the appeal. we were ready to go in march, and we will have decided it that quickly. >> let me read that, and then you can break it down. i'm curious, andrew's reaction as well because that's the plan b here. i just want to reset as we do on the news because i've got two super smart fast talking lawyers here, the breaking news is that jack smith has now stepped up and very quickly, you know, filed his supreme court filing, telling the supreme court we won, we want to put trump on trial. we don't accept any delay. we don't think this should be delayed or

is still working _ britain... jack is still working hard - britain. .. jack is still working hard forg hard for the charity he loves. today's flight is all about raising awareness and vital funding. about raising awareness and vitalfunding. after about raising awareness and vital funding. after plenty of waiting the weather was right and it was time to take to the skies. after taking the controls for a time, jack then relaxes as the pilot performs victory rolls — not one... ..not two... victory rolls — not one... ..nottwo... ..but victory rolls — not one... ..not two... ..but three. and when you have waited this long to fly in a spitfire, it would be rude not to make the most of it. for more stories from across the uk, head to the bbc news website. i'm with the capture. tonight taylor swift threatens to sue. loyal camps back out for 1972 and victory for luxury flats. first we start with everyone's favourite place — the dentist. the government is planning to try and decrease the waiting list for a dentist appointment in england with a cash incentive. dentists who set up practices in ar

jack snyder, everybody thank you, jack.e you being here. [ cheers and applause did you guys see this? during a recent house committee hearing, representative marjorie taylor greene had a a little trouble with the word "indictment. check this out >> this historical evidence is overwhelming that the founding fathers intended impeachment to be used to deal with the commission of "in- dictable" crimes and the abuse of power. [ light laughter ] >> jimmy: it's not her fault when she reads, people always tell her to sound it out [ laughter ] she was like, "there was a a silent letter! how would i 'k-now' that?" [ laughter and applause switching gears, travis kelce said that he won't be at the grammys this weekend with taylor swift, 'cause he needs to focus on the super bowl [ audience ohs ] man, you know your life is good when you can't go to the grammys because you gotta prep for the super bowl [ laughter ] you know what i'm saying "ah, i can't go to the moon today. taylor was like, "i flew to buffalo in january but that's cool,

then, jack smi

i am jack howe and for jack otter. coming up pop potato. january inflation came in higher than expected dampening hopes of an early rate cut. investment strategist chris heisey shares his insight on what it means for investors, move over magnificent seven it is coming down to the magnificent one as investors i next week's earnings report for nvidia why it could be a make or break moment for the stock market. later a look at companies making big moves in a jumpy earnings season but we began with the expert panel and three things investors to be think about right now. on the "barron's roundtable" like colleagues ben levisohn, al root and elizabeth o'brien. let me start with you a down week for the stock market we have not seen a lot of those on market gone up 14 out of 15 weeks until this past week, what you make of the break in the action. >> i think it's a good thing i'm surprised the market wasn't out more first of all because we had the cpi reading the inflation reading it was hot and not what people wanted in the market had a big selloff

i think jack smith is that he certainly projecting that jack smith by reputation is a hard-driving prosecutor, you, ryan goodman is a former special counsel at the department of defense, and a >> professor at nyu. >> he has gone after a political corruption on both sides of the aisle. democrats and republicans, he's also somebody who served as a war crimes prosecutor and has indicted data sitting president in kosovo. so he's that kind of an individual that moves fast and moves aggressively at the same time that also might come with some risks. >> why is there some criticism that he overreaches? >> well, if you look at jack smith's history, his three highest profile cases for this, all of them have failed either at the trial level or the appellate level. and so the criticism is, well, he's overeager, he's over anxious >> what is going to be one of the toughest hurdles for jack smith's team to overcome everything in this case will turn on what donald trump's state of mind is and whether there was corrupt intent all the facts they played out on national television. the speeches have been played

but according to jack smith's indictment, thank you very much. donald trump attempted to wield that influence in an effort to hold onto the presidency how do you view the level of pressure that trump placed on the department of justice? >> does ever been anything like it because donald trump was so desperate bid to hold onto power that he didn't care about the rules >> but leadership at the department of justice did care about the rules and was not bending to the pressure leaders in the department of justice told the former president that there was no outcome determinative fraud for them to launch an investigation to overturn the election. so as part of the pressure campaign and the permanent address, this this is where mr. jeffrey clark kind of rose to prominence. >> jeffrey clark is environmental lawyer lower-level person at the department. he was a completely unremarkable figure >> at a january 6 committee hearing, former acting attorney general, jeffrey rosen, testified about president trump's call to him on christmas eve, 2020. >> did he men

a footnote in jack smith's brief refers the court to a petition jacks mitt filed with the court on december 11th, trying to get the supreme court to take this case then and by past the court of appeals. because it was obviously going to eventually end up in the supreme court anyway, as it has. in that filing, in december, jack smith laid out the timeline of just how quickly the united states supreme court can act when it wants to. quote, on may 24th, 1974, the special prosecutor -- a week later, and set the case for -- the decision issued 16 days later. when the trial began in the fall of 1974. so the timeline, when the supreme court wanted to new move fast in the nixon case, was a total of two months. from the first filing requesting that the supreme court hear the case to the day the supreme court issued its opinion. two months. if the supreme court had taken this case when jack smith asked him to -- -- and if they followed the nixon schedule, they would've issued their opinion on this case on monday of this week. two days ago. and instead, on monday of this week, the trump lawyers filed

i am jack out in for jack otter. coming up u.s.was strong in 2023 despite weak consumer sentiment and high inflation but my guest is warning dangerously slow growth is ahead unless the government gets out of the way. former world bank president david wpresidentdavid will expl. then, commodity, private equity wall street is costly pitching ways to dress up your portfolio. how about finding financial nudism? minimalist approach to investing. our expert panel will debate the merits of stripping down to the bare essentials writing actually. and later, how some online games are becoming a gateway to gambling including for teens. first we begin with our esteemed panel of three things investors ought to be thinking about right now on the barron's roundtable my colleagues out route, and her barry and o'brien. al, i want to start with the of the stock market we are back baby if i may call you baby rip roaring gains and moving in the right direction what do we need to know? oxides like it when you call me that records, records, records s and

okay. >> then there is this other trial that jack smith is bringing forward. and this other case that involves him for activities after his presidency. this is the culling classified documents case now, for that one that's in florida because that's where this mishandling allegedly took place. and trump has a trumping judge, who has been making rulings that the trump lawyers have liked. what is the status of that one? >> well, that one is right now scheduled to go to start in may, but no one believes that that's coming to happen. i think as matter of fact, on friday when we have a very important court hearing in fort pierce with judge aileen cannon. i think we might get a little bit of clarity on that because it's clear that trump team wants that delayed, but they only want to delete a certain amount of time. katelyn polantz reported just a few days ago that the strategy there is to move the date just a little bit in order to make it difficult for the dc case that the case that is overseen by judge chutkan for that to even get on the calendar. and so the idea j

jack smith won, because jack smith said, i want to go to the supreme court. they weren't asking pretty trump's lawyers were asking to send this case back to the 11th circuit, which is what they were asking for. >> they could have delayed it more than an extra month. >> i don't disagree with you. on this channel of, is this do or die because it he doesn't go to trial? >> first day of the appeal. if you find him guilty, he will go out to the courthouse and say, i'm appealing. he will be standing on the steps sometime in april doing the same thing and maybe even before the supreme court. he will be seen, i will appeal. >> my reaction to it isn't about the implications for what it means for the electoral chances, but it is a level of craziness from the court. they are moving at this pace and i find it deeply unnerving. think about the court. they move fast when they want to, but move slow when they move slow. >> the court that filed against nixon -- this court as fast for them, but i do agree that this is the most isolated court in the history of the court, so th

come on, don't move, jack, put the gun down, i don't want it.fended myself. american shirt, boots too, us navy , the motto is always to be faithful, now you understand, jack, we’ll set you up, i’m not a killer, you have to believe me, then you’ll tell me, give me the gun, jack, hurry up, open the trunk while you’re here there is no one, take him by the hand , and years later they asked you to do something for them, pull yourself together jack, don’t give in to the spirits ahead of time, that’s what they say at our house, we will ensure your safety, we will always be there, in return you help us, as soon as they call you and assign a stash location, you will contact me, call liza, always from a street payphone, tell me that... you were able to reach me, the information is important, i don’t want liza to know about this, calm down, she won't know anything, the text is as follows, defa wants to meet about. it's already so late, where have you been? the audience didn't let go, what happened? nothing, i'm just tired, tired, let's go. confidential inf

jack smith won here to. because jack smith said i want to go straight to the supreme court. they weren't asking to go to the supreme court. trump's lawyers were asking to send this case back to the 11th circuit. that's what they were actually asking for. the supreme court, said no. >> okay. >> but they could've delayed, it more than an extra month by sending it back to the circuit. >> so, i don't disagree with. you on this sort of channel of, is this door die for the, company because if he doesn't go to trial he's going to, when i don't agree with you. >> i agree, it's like the first day of the peel. if you find him guilty on, that he's gonna grow up in the courthouse and, say i'm appealing. by the, way will be standing on the courthouse steps, probably sometime in april doing the same thing. doing the same, thing maybe before the supreme court rules. he's gonna say, i'm gonna peel what stormy daniels. >> with, me i think my reaction to it isn't necessarily for the implication that it means for the electoral chances of donald trump. it is a level of craziness from the court.

now, having said that, jack smith has things he can do. he could make an argument to the judge that 88 days should be shortened, that that time frame she had given before isn't needed. it was too generous. they could also shorten their trial. they could say that we are not going to do -- >> let me jump in. i'm only jumping in because now it's feeling really tactical to me. and andrew, if it's tactical for me, how do other people feel? because these are two legal nerds. so i'm going to say putting tactics a little bit aside, what is the latest you think they could reasonably start this trial? >> i think if it doesn't start by some time in july, i think it is really hard to see the judge saying that they're going to go forward and have him -- i mean at some point there is going to be pressure on the district judge to say am i going to have the leading candidate for one of the parties on trial and not being able to -- you know, has to attend to a trial and should be running for office. at some point that tension, i think, is going to be somet

that's special counsel jack smith tried to impose upon them way back in december when jack smith went to the supreme court and said, justices, please take up this case now so that we can get a clear answer. this is yours to answer. and then once the dc circuit once the supreme court said no, we're not coming in and the dc circuit ruled that was another several weeks, so president trump's former president trump's effort to run the clock has a partner in the supreme court at this point, even though jake probably in the end, the justices will agree with the dc circuit and say and reject president, former president donald trump's claim of absolute immunity. >> but >> what good will that do for any kind of trial before we're really into the heat of this next presidential election. >> so just, just to recap, joan the us supreme court is not going to just like defer to the appeals court. they are going to hear the argument about whether or not donald trump has immunity. can say that what he did as president is he's immune from prosecution because he was president at the time. do we have any

become german. jack is still working hard _ have become german. jack is still working hard for- haveand vital funding. after plenty of waiting, the weather was right — and it was time to take to the skies. after taking the controls for a time, jack then relaxes as the pilot performs victory rolls. not one... ..not two... ..but three. and when you've waited this long to fly in a spitfire, it'd be rude not to make the most of it. for more stories from across the uk, head to the bbc news website. hello. i'mjack hello. i'm jack with the catch—up. tonight, the king's been out and about. why miss japan was stripped of her title. and breaking boundies around hearing loss. first — the king's been out today for the first time since the palace announced he has cancer. here he is with queen camilla about to travel to sandringham by helicopter. prince harry flew back from california to visit, but apparently he doesn't plan to meet his brother whilst he's here. and we know that cancer in one way or another affects all of us, so if you're finding the news hard to deal with, you can read info on wh

and jack smith 's brief to the supreme court, jack smith argued there was no need for the supreme court to ue hear the case at all. but if the supreme court was inclined to hear the case, jack smith asked the supreme court not to send the case back for another round at the appeals course, but to set an expedited hearing at the supreme court, schedule that expedited hearing. and that is what the supreme court now is done. leading off our discussion tonight is neal katyal, former acting isu.s. solicitor general and host of the podcast courtside with neal katyal. he is a msnbc legal analyst. and neal, i want to begin the way all lawyers begin when they get these notices from the supreme court that they're going to hear your case. they have the supreme court identified four the lawyers on both sides the question, and the only question, they want to hear addressed. and i want to give that question to the audience now. the question is whether, and if so to etwhat extent, does a forr president enjoy presidential immunity from criminal prosecution for conduct alleged to involve official acts du

now, jack smith makes a couple of arguments. first of all, he says, donald trump does not have any realistic probability of succeeding on his immunity claim. and that's something you have to show at this point. for the supreme court to put the brakes on and take the case and then jack smith's has and there's a broader public interest in getting dumped. trump tried. he does not say before the election, jack smith continues to refuse to acknowledge that he's motivated by the election, but he says there's a broad public interest in getting donald trump tried quickly on these charges. now, the other thing jack smith says to the supreme court is, if you are not going to put this on pause, if you are going to take this case, please. please please rule get give us as short and quick a schedule as you possibly can. jack smith obviously wants to cover himself at every turn and give himself the maximum possible chance to get this case tried before the election. >> jennifer, what stands out to you >> well, i agree with elie all of those po

he's a regular old jack. jack in the crotch? murder crotch tonight at nine, after macgyver jack jack-in-the-crotch. >> greg: murdercrotch, tonight at 9:00 after mciver. lin' me you can get directv — the good stuff — and you don't need a satellite dish? oh, i used to love doin' my business on those things! you're one sick pigeon. them dishes kept the rain off our beaks! we just have different priorities is all. satellite-free directv... never thought i'd see the day. well, our lifespans are quite short... stream directv without a satellite dish. i'm going to do this thing with my neck, just for a bit. (tony hawk) skating for over 45 years has taken a toll on my body. i take qunol turmeric because it helps with healthy joints and inflammation support. why qunol? it has superior absorption compared to regular turmeric. qunol. the brand i trust. before my doctor and i chose breztri for my copd, i had bad days, (cough cough) flare-ups that could permanently damage my lungs. with breztri, things changed for me. breztri gave me better

and strossberg jack is always thank you. i'll be back at the top of the hour with more real news followed by the day i hope to see you then the pricing strategies with a lot say what grade the this is the story of china is historic. economic slowdown and what the end of its decades on the means for the rest of asia, the most dynamic region of the global economy.

sorry, jack smith. i mean, does that seem unusual to you? i don't think unusual even begins to capture it. it's really extraordinary. prosecutors have to be able to protect witnesses, not just in this case but in every case, because we ask people to come forward, detail the truth so we can hold criminals accountable. sometimes criminals aren't super nice people. in this case we've got a defendant who, whether through his fault or through the implications his followers take from his comments, witnesses, people who have spoken out against him, have been exposed to risk. in some cases, speaker pelosi's husband paul comes to mind, exposed to higher because his wife had become one of trump's political targets. so look, if you are a federal judge, what you are doing here is listening to prosecutors. you're carefully evaluating evidence of the law. when they come to you seeing this is so serious that we have an ongoing investigation that we need to protect, you don't then turn that over to donald trump the defendant. >> it seems like there is a cas

jack did this movement only. yes. means yes, it started after a huge controversy around the rape case in spain and madrid that brought in this law that we're talking about. but is it fair to say that it's been rather problematic there? so yeah, it really has so space the only country that has it. yes means yes. so, and it was off to this move pack goes back codes, set of gang rape. this rate to women at the running of the bulls in pamplona. in 2016. and during that trial, the defense showed a video of the woman where she was immobile with her eyes closed and said that because she hadn't explicitly said no, it couldn't be a mind to to rate. those perpetrators initially only got charged with sexual abuse and not with rate spain and brought in a yes means yes, a little, but it kept became very complicated because the defense lawyers for rapists that had already been imprisoned, managed to find loopholes. because the definition was a straight, which live 1300 sites are defend the sex offenders to be released from pri

>> biggest picture, huge win for jack smith. unequivocal win for jack smith. the language in this ruling is very strong. they forcefully reject donald trump's immunity arguments. there's really three major findings that the d.c. court of appeals makes here. first of all, they reject this notion of blanket immunity. they say it is not and cannot be that a president simply can never be charged for anything that happens during his time in office. second, the court of appeals in d.c. says, if we're asking the question whether donald trump's conduct was inside his job as president or outside his job as president, they say he was out of bounds here. he's not covered because high was out of bounds. even if there is am immunity for stuff that's inside the presidency, he's way out of it. fully, they reject this i think ludicrous argument that, well, a president can only be indicted if he has first been impeached by the house and convicted by the senate. remember, that led to the ridiculous hypotheticals about could a president order assassination. so this court of appe

jack is still working _ have become german. jack is still working hard _ have become german.orking hard for the - still working hard for the charity he loves, the flight todayis charity he loves, the flight today is all about raising awareness and vital funding. after plenty of waiting, the weather was right, and it was time to take to the skies. after taking the controls for a time, jack then relaxes as the pilot performs victory roles. not one, not two but three! and when you have waited this long to fly in a spitfire, it would be rude not to make the most of it. would be rude not to make the most of it— most of it. for more stories across the _ most of it. for more stories across the uk, _ most of it. for more stories across the uk, head - most of it. for more stories across the uk, head to - most of it. for more stories across the uk, head to the l most of it. for more stories . across the uk, head to the bbc news _ across the uk, head to the bbc news website. _ hello and welcome to sports day. i'm lizzie greenwood—hughes with the headlines. celebrations for the ivory coa

, who has cerebral _ like out of dr who. jack, who has cerebral palsy, _ like out of dr who. jack, who, who has cerebral palsy, once an l has cerebral palsy, once an authentically brummie boys to reflect his heritage and is inviting people to volunteer bears. the 21—year—old has been using his current communication aid, which he controls with his eyes, since he was six years old, but the technology has come a long way since then. he wants to be _ come a long way since then. he: wants to be able to say i do, and to say all his bowels as a human at his wedding, instead of as a robot. it human at his wedding, instead of as a robot.— of as a robot. it is not a small commitment. - of as a robot. it is not a| small commitment. the of as a robot. it is not a - small commitment. the chosen volunteer will need to spend six to eight hours recording around 1600 phrases. so far, they've had half a dozen responses. but he need look no further. i think i've got a solution. all right, babb. i'm off up the road to get a cop. are a bit. off up the road to get a cop. are a bit-— are a bit. david, that w

, filed his reply to donald trump's effort to stop the trial and the win that jack smith got in that appeals court. they are citing donald trump's alleged effort to perpetuate himself in power, the charged crime strike at the heart of our democracy, and smith says the supreme court should not stay or delay this case, that the trial should commence on the planned schedule, which means if he won,

and special counsel jack smith and judge chutkan have also signaled we're looking at something like a three-month trial for this. let's assume 88 days for trump's team to finish their prep before the trial, and let's assume the three months theeded for the trial itself is a nice round 90 days. that comes out to 178 days. that is how long it would take for this trial to actually conclude after we get a decision back from the supreme court. so let's go back to the calender. the election is november 5, an oral argument on trump's presidential immunity claims at the supreme court is set for the week of april 22nd. this would be the fastest possible scenario here as everything stands at present. the supreme court meet monday april 22prnd and they make a decision the next day, tuesday, april 23rd. if we add 178 days to tuesday, april 23rd, that would mean the trial would finish on wednesday, october 16th. 20 days before the general election. that is what we are working with here in the best case scenario. joining me now is neil katyal, former acting solicitor-general of the united states an

because if they went with jack smith then everybody claims that they're playing politics and puttingn the scale of the government and if they do it the way they've done it people claim they've put their thumb on the scale for trump, so i don't know if there's any real way out for them here without getting the type of criticism they're getting. so we'll see. >> again, i'll go back and forth with you, but david, you're using shorthand of saying who they go with. all donald trump cares about is avoiding this trial by the election. if they do something that does that then they've gone with trump. as i said the viewers know what's going on. i'm happy to hear a counterargument. what is the worth -- what's the legal value, david, of a precedent that says you can put him on trial, but we won't let you. >> look, i'm just trying to throw some arguments on there. not that i disagree with you, they're the arguments being presented, but on the other side is that in those other cases you cited there is an external non-case issue that kind of drives the decision as opposed to when this needs to be